Texas registers over a quarter million new voters with no ID

[TheCount]

Wow, that would be a pretty incredible thing if it happened

Austin — There have been recent and inaccurate reports about the voter registration process and ID requirements in Texas. Please see the statement from Secretary of State Jane Nelson below.

"It is totally inaccurate that 1.2 million voters have registered to vote in Texas without a photo ID this year. The truth is our voter rolls have increased by 57,711 voters since the beginning of 2024. This is less than the number of people registered in the same timeframe in 2022 (about 65,000) and in 2020 (about 104,000).

When Texans register to vote, they must provide a driver license number or a Social Security number. When an individual registers to vote with just a SSN, the state verifies that the SSN is authentic.

While federal law allows individuals to register to vote without a photo ID, Texans must actually show proof of ID to vote. The 1.2 million figure comes from the Social Security Administration’s (SSA) website, which is supposed to report the number of times states have asked to verify an individual’s social security number. The SSA number is clearly incorrect, and we are working now to determine why there is such a large discrepancy."

https://www.sos.state.tx.us/about/newsreleases/2024/040324.shtml

 

[Anti Federalist]

https://www.sos.state.tx.us/about/newsreleases/2024/040324.shtml

That's good to know, thanks for the update.

 

[CaptUSA]

The 1.2 million figure comes from the Social Security Administration’s (SSA) website, which is supposed to report the number of times states have asked to verify an individual’s social security number. The SSA number is clearly incorrect, and we are working now to determine why there is such a large discrepancy."

So, you'll get back to us to provide the government's explanation, then??

 

[Anti Federalist]

So, you'll get back to us to provide the government's explanation, then??

Oh, I'm sure he will.

 

[TheCount]

So, you'll get back to us to provide the government's explanation, then??

This just in: the correct figure is 1.27 billion brown muslim illegals per second

 

[CaptUSA]

This just in: the correct figure is 1.27 billion brown muslim illegals per second

Is that a NO, then? Just, "see, it's a just government mistake, nothing to see here?" Seems to be modus operandi whenever something suspicious is found.

 

[Snowball]

That's good to know, thanks for the update.

The devil is in the final sentence......

"The 1.2 million figure comes from the Social Security Administration’s (SSA) website, which is supposed to report the number of times states have asked to verify an individual’s social security number. The SSA number is clearly incorrect, and we are working now to determine why there is such a large discrepancy."

which means they could be out there whether Texas acknowleges it or not
by election day, poof! valid!

these "tries" are all SSN's being put into the db of Feds
you figure out where those SSN's came from......... TEAM BIDEN.

 

[TheCount]

Is that a NO, then? Just, "see, it's a just government mistake, nothing to see here?" Seems to be modus operandi whenever something suspicious is found.

What mistake?

 

[PAF]

these "tries" are all SSN's being put into the db of Feds
you figure out where those SSN's came from......... TEAM BIDEN.

Great. More social security use & abuse, which was only supposed to be used for............... Social Security.

Anyway, I can't wait to see the excuses if/when Trump "wins". Because then that will be ok. Right?

 

[Snowball]

Great. More social security use & abuse, which was only supposed to be used for............... Social Security.

Anyway, I can't wait to see the excuses if/when Trump "wins". Because then that will be ok. Right?

affirmative.

too bad that already. freaking. happened.

 

[CaptUSA]

The 1.2 million figure comes from the Social Security Administration’s (SSA) website, which is supposed to report the number of times states have asked to verify an individual’s social security number. The SSA number is clearly incorrect, and we are working now to determine why there is such a large discrepancy."

So, you'll get back to us to provide the government's explanation, then??

<unhelpful dodging of the question>

Is that a NO, then? Just, "see, it's a just government mistake, nothing to see here?" Seems to be modus operandi whenever something suspicious is found.

What mistake?

Oh, so it wasn't a mistake? The number is incorrect on purpose? Please fill us in. I'm having a hard time trying to follow your swerving.

 

[Anti Federalist]

Looky looky here...

https://twitter.com/EndWokeness/status/1778871383042269467

 

[Occam's Banana]

 

[TheCount]

Looky looky here...

https://twitter.com/EndWokeness/status/1778871383042269467

They're hiding the fact that it was six gorillion illegals this week

 

[TheCount]

Oh, so it wasn't a mistake? The number is incorrect on purpose? Please fill us in. I'm having a hard time trying to follow your swerving.

End Wokeness was the one who claimed that the number on the SSA site represented new voters without a photo ID. That's not what that number is or was.


Now you want the "right number" of new voters without a photo ID... from the site that doesn't measure the number of new voters without a photo ID?

 

[Anti Federalist]

They're hiding the fact that it was six gorillion illegals this week

Oh, I'm supposed to feel better it was only 6 bazillion invaders this week?

 

[Anti Federalist]

End Wokeness was the one who claimed that the number on the SSA site represented new voters without a photo ID. That's not what that number is or was.


Now you want the "right number" of new voters without a photo ID... from the site that doesn't measure the number of new voters without a photo ID?

OK, fine, you think the number is bullshit.

What IS the number then?

Oh, gee whiz, we're not allowed to see that number anymore, SSA just classified it.

Nothing to see here now folks...move along.

 

[TheCount]

OK, fine, you think the number is bullshit.

It's not that the number is bullshit. The number simply is not and was not the thing that blue checks said that it was.

They made an empty claim out of ignorance. But because that claim was delivered by a blue check account with lots of followers, it was automatically accepted as an article of faith. This is the hell of social media.

What IS the number then?

Much like End Wokeness, I don't know what that number is or means.

Oh, gee whiz, we're not allowed to see that number anymore, SSA just classified it.

Nothing to see here now folks...move along.

Six gorillion per second.

 

[CaptUSA]

End Wokeness was the one who claimed that the number on the SSA site represented new voters without a photo ID. That's not what that number is or was.


Now you want the "right number" of new voters without a photo ID... from the site that doesn't measure the number of new voters without a photo ID?

No, dipshit - quit avoiding it. I want to know why the error... Why the discrepancy??? What was going on that provided the fodder for that Twitter post in the first place??

Texas is saying it was clearly a mistake... well, why is that? What happened to inflate those numbers of requests if they didn't come from the state?? And what is the purpose for all the extra attempts?? I know it'd be easier to just drop it, but it certainly seems suspicious that a government database would be recording requests that didn't happen. Or maybe they did?

You can dodge and bob and weave, but there's got to be an explanation. If you don't think it was anything untoward, I'm sure you can fill us in.

 

[TheCount]

No, dipshit - quit avoiding it. I want to know why the error... Why the discrepancy???

We don't even know if it's an error or if the number is accurate.

What was going on that provided the fodder for that Twitter post in the first place??

When there's no evidence of voter fraud, it is invented.

Texas is saying it was clearly a mistake... well, why is that? What happened to inflate those numbers of requests if they didn't come from the state?? And what is the purpose for all the extra attempts?? I know it'd be easier to just drop it, but it certainly seems suspicious that a government database would be recording requests that didn't happen. Or maybe they did?

Texas didn't say the number is a mistake. Texas said that the number didn't match their new voter numbers.

The number isn't measuring the thing that End Wokeness said it measures. It's a count of database checks. That could be new voters, scrub of existing voter rolls, or something else.

You can dodge and bob and weave, but there's got to be an explanation. If you don't think it was anything untoward, I'm sure you can fill us in.

The explanation is that this gets clicks and views because blue checks are hungry for any narrative -maintaining thing.