Carlybee
Member
- Joined
- Feb 5, 2012
- Messages
- 10,255
FORT WORTH, Texas (AP) - Locked in an ideological struggle between tea party activists and traditional conservatives, the Texas Republican Convention was hammering out a platform Saturday set to preserve a softer stance on immigration, while also endorsing voluntary counseling to “cure” being gay.
Booing and shouting sometimes interrupted hours of debate among roughly 7,000 delegates, and party chairman Steve Munisteri pleaded for civility. [...]
Meanwhile, delegates looked poised to avoid a floor fight as they considered scrapping long-standing platform language that “homosexuality tears at the fabric of society.” But they also were set to sanction language allowing Texans to seek voluntary counseling to “cure” being gay - in contrast to California and New Jersey, which have previously banned such therapy, citing evidence it was dangerous to young people.
Gay conservatives said they didn’t want to oppose the motion for fear there could be a backlash resulting in even harsher platform language.
What tears at society more? Homosexuality?
How about sending our best people overseas to be blown to bits in useless wars and a stagnate economy?
What tears at society more? Homosexuality?
How about sending our best people overseas to be blown to bits in useless wars and a stagnate economy?
Best people? What algorithm determined that?
Supposedly the "cure" is voluntary. I see no reason this should be part of a campaign platform. Kind of hard to tell Dems you want smaller government and then embrace crap like this.
I'm neither in favor nor opposed to these cures because I have no idea if they work, what methods are used, side effects, etc. But I agree that this makes no sense to have in a campaign platform. Homosexuality should not be a political issue at all.
I'm neither in favor nor opposed to these cures because I have no idea if they work, what methods are used, side effects, etc. But I agree that this makes no sense to have in a campaign platform. Homosexuality should not be a political issue at all.
I have no idea who that guy is, but I do know that some gay people do want children and are fully capable of producing same without ever "curing", abandoning, or even denying their homosexuality.It worked for this guy...
![]()
^ this. With the operative word here (IMHO) being "pointless".This is the kind of pointless neanderthal nonsense that keeps a lot of educated, intelligent people from supporting the Republican Party.
How does this help the Republican Party?