Team Obama calls global warming doubters 'crazy'

The key is that it has NOTHING, I repeat NOTHING, to do with human action.

The sun is driving climate change. To believe otherwise is a state of mental toxicity.

We are polluting our environment. That's it. It is scientifically false to think/say WE are the cause of the globe getting any warmer (or cooler!). The level of arrogance is comical.

Global warming is a real phenomenon but nothing to the extent of which the left would have you think
 
Last edited:
The key is that is has NOTHING, I repeat NOTHING, to do with human action.

The sun is driving climate change. To believe otherwise is a state of mental toxicity.

We are polluting our environment. That's it. It is scientifically false to think/say WE are the cause of the globe getting any warmer (or cooler!). The level of arrogance is comical.

Well, they don't want to hear about how the other planets are having "climate change" just like the one we are on.
 
Exactly. The subterrain ice caps under Mars are also melting. This is SOLAR driven, without a shadow of doubt.

Well, they don't want to hear about how the other planets are having "climate change" just like the one we are on.
 
Meh, the Priest class is at it again. We call them scientists now.

200 years is to short a time to yield any reliable data as regards things of this magnitude involving this many variables. I happen to believe that 'climate change' is inevitable. Should cows stop farting and people stop driving tomorrow, the climate is still going to change and drastically. God gave me the wisdom to, serenely, accept this thing I cannot change. That an undereducated twat such as myself can see this leads me to believe that the 'scientist class' are being disingenuous in their panic.

Speaking of variables, it has always seemed to me like there are many. Why is it all of the so call studies only consider one? I write such studies off as prejudiced.
 
Last edited:
Meh, the Priest class is at it again. We call them scientists now.

200 years is to short a time to yield any reliable data as regards things of this magnitude involving this many variables. I happen to believe that 'climate change' is inevitable. Should cows stop farting and people stop driving tomorrow, the climate is still going to change and drastically. God gave me the wisdom to, serenely, accept this thing I cannot change. That an undereducated twat such as myself can see this leads me to believe that the 'scientist class' are being disingenuous in their panic.

Speaking of variables, it has always seemed to me like there are many. Why is it all of the so call studies only consider one? I write such studies off as prejudiced.
Panic begets funding, funding is how those very scientist make money. And yes they are human and subject to human foibles.
 
Meh, the Priest class is at it again. We call them scientists now.

200 years is to short a time to yield any reliable data as regards things of this magnitude involving this many variables. I happen to believe that 'climate change' is inevitable. Should cows stop farting and people stop driving tomorrow, the climate is still going to change and drastically. God gave me the wisdom to, serenely, accept this thing I cannot change. That an undereducated twat such as myself can see this leads me to believe that the 'scientist class' are being disingenuous in their panic.

Speaking of variables, it has always seemed to me like there are many. Why is it all of the so call studies only consider one? I write such studies off as prejudiced.

Priest Class , I like it .
 
Interesting how we are taught to feel guilty regarding industrialization and what it is currently doing to the environment here in America as if our country's environmental policies actually direct the globe. These guilt trips are driven by the same media that tells us that the air quality in China in their major cities is so bad that people buy canned air if they can afford it just to experience "clean air." I don't doubt that they have dirty air over there, but where is the talk of what China's destructively careless attitude is doing to the rest of the globe? Not a word. I have yet to see one prediction, chart, or timeline that illustrates how China's lack of environmental policies are dooming us all and if this continues, it wouldn't even be America the great that ushers the globe into some boiling death. Yet these same American businesses, many who donate to administrations that push this idea, clearly don't have a problem investing even more money into China's infrastructure, while continue to prove to the world we can master cronyism and be our own worst enemy at the same time. What a hat trick.
 
Last edited:
Every Science has a counter Pseudo Science. The one that typically is endorsed is the one that is most beneficial to the promoting the endorsers agenda.

For example, Astronomy has Astrology. Mathematics has Numerology. I could write a whole list, but its pointless.

Now if the Govt wanted to foribly implement a Carbon Tax on every single Mundane on the entire planet, which side of the Global Warming debate do you think they'll endorse? Which point of view is going to help promote Agenda 21? Which one is going to allow more for them and less for us?
 
I agree with them. If you don't believe global warming is real, you're foolish.

Either way, you should always try and save the environment and stay "green", so whether it exists or not is irrelevant.
 
I agree with them. If you don't believe global warming is real, you're foolish.

Either way, you should always try and save the environment and stay "green", so whether it exists or not is irrelevant.
It's foolish to blindly except anything without questioning it and that's what we do here, question. It's foolish to except imposed austerity on the mundane masses, carbon tax and agenda 21. These create poverty.
 
I done learnt all I needs to know at the government sponsored institute of higher learnin'...

Go team rah!

obama reminds me more of apophis.
apophis.jpg
 
Everyone who doesn't believe in the state endorsed religions of evolution and global warming are "nuts" and "kooks". The state endorses these two religions because they are so easily used to control the people and grow the size and scope of government.
 
It's foolish to blindly except anything without questioning it and that's what we do here, question. It's foolish to except imposed austerity on the mundane masses, carbon tax and agenda 21. These create poverty.
Where do you get the idea that I have not questioned it? I have done my research, and it is very apparent that global warming is indeed a major problem that exists.

But again, whether it exists or not, we should strive to "go green".
 
Back
Top