Tea Party Marine Investigated for Disloyalty to Obama

Joined
Sep 20, 2011
Messages
13,839
Tea Party Marine Investigated for Disloyalty to Obama

Kurt Nimmo
Infowars.com
March 5, 2012

The Armed Forces Tea Party reports that Camp Pendleton Marine Gary Stein is being officially investigated for making disloyal comments about Obama. “The comments in question were made by his personal Facebook profile during a discussion about ‘NATO allowing the trial of US Troops for burning the Koran’ on a Facebook Group and since been deleted,” a post today explains.

stein_640.jpg


Stein created the Armed Forces Tea Party Facebook page in April of 2010 as a way to make public his opposition to Obamacare. In response to superior officers asking Stein to review Department of Defense directives on political activities, the Marine removed the page. It was revived hours later by a civilian member of a local Tea Party group.

“I’m speaking as Gary Stein, not as Sgt. Gary Stein,” he told FoxNews.com. “I just want to give my daughter the greatest country that we can, just like my parents gave me. I want her to inherit the America I know we can be.”

The Armed Forces Tea Party Facebook page explains that Stein is being charged under the Uniform Code of Military Justice, Article 134, which “authorizes the prosecution of offenses not specifically detailed by any other article: all disorders and neglects to the prejudice of good order and discipline in the armed forces, all conduct of a nature to bring discredit upon the armed forces, and crimes and offenses not capital, of which persons subject to this chapter may be guilty,” according to Wikipedia.

The military has taken a hard line on political activity by soldiers in recent months. In January, Army reservist Cpl. Jesse Thorsen took the stage at a political event in Iowa and expressed his support for presidential candidate Ron Paul. “His foreign policy is by far, hands down better than any other candidate’s out there,” Thorsen told Paul’s supporters.

Army Reserve spokeswoman Maj. Angel Wallace told the Associated Press participating in a partisan political event in uniform is a violation of Defense Department rules and the military is reviewing whether Thorsen could face legal ramifications.

In February, Paul’s campaign said they received more donations from active-duty military than all of the other presidential candidates combined, including Barack Obama.


original article here:
http://www.infowars.com/tea-party-marine-investigated-for-disloyalty-to-obama/
 
Tea Party Marine Investigated for Disloyalty to Obama

Kurt Nimmo
Infowars.com
March 5, 2012

The Armed Forces Tea Party reports that Camp Pendleton Marine Gary Stein is being officially investigated for making disloyal comments about Obama. “The comments in question were made by his personal Facebook profile during a discussion about ‘NATO allowing the trial of US Troops for burning the Koran’ on a Facebook Group and since been deleted,” a post today explains.

stein_640.jpg
Stein created the Armed Forces Tea Party Facebook page in April of 2010 as a way to make public his opposition to Obamacare. In response to superior officers asking Stein to review Department of Defense directives on political activities, the Marine removed the page. It was revived hours later by a civilian member of a local Tea Party group.

“I’m speaking as Gary Stein, not as Sgt. Gary Stein,” he told FoxNews.com. “I just want to give my daughter the greatest country that we can, just like my parents gave me. I want her to inherit the America I know we can be.”

The Armed Forces Tea Party Facebook page explains that Stein is being charged under the Uniform Code of Military Justice, Article 134, which “authorizes the prosecution of offenses not specifically detailed by any other article: all disorders and neglects to the prejudice of good order and discipline in the armed forces, all conduct of a nature to bring discredit upon the armed forces, and crimes and offenses not capital, of which persons subject to this chapter may be guilty,” according to Wikipedia.

The military has taken a hard line on political activity by soldiers in recent months. In January, Army reservist Cpl. Jesse Thorsen took the stage at a political event in Iowa and expressed his support for presidential candidate Ron Paul. “His foreign policy is by far, hands down better than any other candidate’s out there,” Thorsen told Paul’s supporters.

Army Reserve spokeswoman Maj. Angel Wallace told the Associated Press participating in a partisan political event in uniform is a violation of Defense Department rules and the military is reviewing whether Thorsen could face legal ramifications.

In February, Paul’s campaign said they received more donations from active-duty military than all of the other presidential candidates combined, including Barack Obama.
 
We've become the frigin Soviet Union... never marginalize criminal politicians the Polutboro demands all comrades of our glorious armies to serve our hero leaders to their death.

It's not your 1st amendment, it's OURS...
It's not your Free Speech, it's OURS...
It's not your Rights, it's OURS...
It's not your Liberty, it's OURS...

And since it is OURS, WE can say, restrict, takeaway, and punish you as WE wish.
 
Last edited:
Ah yes Article 134...the general article they love to use when you really have done nothing wrong...you just pissed somebody off.
 
I thought that the oath was to the constitution, not the president. Can I get a vets opinion on this?
 
I thought that the oath was to the constitution, not the president. Can I get a vets opinion on this?

There are two oaths, one for enlisted and one for officers. Different loyalties for different roles.

Enlisted:
"I, _____, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; and that I will obey the orders of the President of the United States and the orders of the officers appointed over me, according to regulations and the Uniform Code of Military Justice. So help me God."


Officer:
"I, _____, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic, that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office upon which I am about to enter; So help me God."


An officer's only responsibility is to the constitution. Enlisted are bound to follow the orders of those appointed over them.


you swear an oath to the Constitution and president nowadays.

With your avatar I would expect more from you. :rolleyes:
 
Last edited:
The Dod directive is pretty clear , I read it a few weeks/months ago , maybe 13 pages , large print , easy to understand . Granted , if these rules were in place 21 to 24 years ago , ( and they probably were ) , I was guilty , up to at a minimum af one day a month of breaking the rules whenever I was not deployed , not that I would have cared , and I really doubt any liberal would have had the balls to call me out on it , would have been too costly to them politically in the long run,
 
Back
Top