WRellim
Member
- Joined
- Sep 29, 2007
- Messages
- 2,140
This is exactly right.
I do believe that people need to cover their own basis. My father has a 300 acre ranch in Montana and luckily has accumulated enough wealth with no debt to make sure we could survive, however, when the system does finally collapse there will be only a few courses of action.
1) an organized group will be in a position to seize this power and bring this country back from the dead
2) the group currently in power uses FORCE to maintain control of it and takes the last remaining liberty and freedom we have left. At this time we will either fight or retreat to that ranch in Montana. Part of me sees amazing conviction in the people here and across the country. But the other part of me wonders what people would do if they were holding a gun to your child's head.
But how many is enough?
If 200 people resisted, it would be dismissed unless the fight is on a very local level.
But on a national scale, even 20,000 people would be passed off. But what about 20 million or 100 million? How do you organize that many people? Who wants to go first? Eventually the first domino will fall and everything will depend on how many fall thereafter.
No regime lasts forever.
And it is amazing how much trouble even a small number of people can cause, especially if they are motivated to keep it up, to keep it random, and they are scattered amongst the population at large.
And formal organization really isn't necessary. Just flow -- however "slowly" and however clandestinely -- of information and news of what works. Often just the knowledge of the results is enough... smart people can replicate the steps needed to create something similar, even w/o a detailed manual.
(BTW, if you want a "cool" read -- go dig up some Vernor Vinge, his old "The Peace War" is interesting. And a lot of old Jerry Pournelle and well, lots of others... insurgents and free markets win every time, all the time but it's a process of wearing down a regime, more like putting sand in gearboxes than blowing up the truck.)
As to the "holding the gun to your child's head" -- well that's one of the reasons that married family men tend to be in the minority in such things, and the single men, young men, and "unattached" people tend to be more in the forefront... And heaven help them if they pull the trigger on that child's head, because after that... well the Dad no longer has much to lose, and a LOT to revenge).
Last edited: