Superbowl Commercial needed for 99% name recognition on super tueday.

[buffalokid777]

Rand Paul today said we have gone from 0%-40% name recognition.

THAT IS NOT ENOUGH!

The best way IMO to combat this is a Ron Paul superbowl commercial.

It will not be cheap, it will cost millions for one, but we need greater name recognition and this is the one time we can reach ALL states with deep saturation in the message.

Companies have been made successful with one super bowl commercial.

I think a political campaign can too.

This is something i feel could be the greatest thing we could do to get the name recognition monkey off out back.

HQ, I know its alot to buy a superbowl ad, but if we are in this to win it, this is what we need for a good showing on super Tuesday, it's far enough in advance to super Tuesday to be the seed that converts many to RP on February 5th.

Please, Please consider this!.

 

[rancher89]

Imho

a utube video would be better than some of the ads I've seen.....

 

[jabrownie]

Don't believe superbowl commercials by candidates are allowed, tried a few years back by others.

It cost millions to do one 30 second spot. We could reach more viewers, on more occasions, for a cheaper price tag by using other methods.

Great enthusiasm though, we do need better ads (check here: http://www.operationbroadcastfreedom.com/index.html ) although the new military one is a step up from the previous ones.

 

[Matt Collins]

Yes - highly targeted marketing would be better - direct mail, radio ads on conservative talk, tv ads on the nightly news and cable news channels, newspaper ads next to editorial sections etc...

 

[Thrashertm]

A superbowl ad brings CREDIBILITY that the other low-budget methods cannot match. Think about what happened to godaddy.com when it put an ad up there...it became the most popular web hosting company around.

 

[HOLLYWOOD]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Super_Bowl_XLII

30 seconds: $2.7 MILLION + commercial costs

VIEWERS: 140 million television viewers

One of fifty-eight 30-second spots will cost an estimated $2.7 million, up from $2.6 million in 2006.

 

[arctica2]

That's one money bomb, and I know I'd donate more for a super bowl ad than the bottomless pit of HQ ...

 

[santopia]

It worked for monster.com. They were a nobody and had only about $1 million dollars left.

They spent nearly all of it on 1 single superbowl commercial.

Next, they were huge.

 

[KookfromChicago]

I'd donate for the effort, but this will be tough to pull off on very short notice.

There would be a HUGE commentary about it the next day also.

 

[angrydragon]

Just use one of the grassroots commercials already made.

 

[LibertiORDeth]

Don't believe superbowl commercials by candidates are allowed, tried a few years back by others.

It cost millions to do one 30 second spot. We could reach more viewers, on more occasions, for a cheaper price tag by using other methods.

Great enthusiasm though, we do need better ads (check here: http://www.operationbroadcastfreedom.com/index.html ) although the new military one is a step up from the previous ones.

I think its like 3 mil, but its worth it.

 

[HOLLYWOOD]

SO EASY... a CAVEMAN CAN DO IT!

I think its like 3 mil, but its worth it.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Super_Bowl_XLII

30 seconds: $2.7 MILLION + commercial production costs

So you're looking about $3 MILLION total

VIEWERS: 140 million television viewers

The BAD PART... THE CAMPAIGN STAFF would run one of the BORING OLD FLAG WAVING Crappy Produced Commercials... SUPER BOWL VIEWER WANT ENTERTAINING UNIQUE commercials...

I would do a funny Parity:
So Easy To GET THESE CAVEMEN/CAVEWOMEN OUT OF WASHINGTON!

Danger Danger Americans!

 

[spudea]

This would definetly push name recognition towards 100%. A good enough commercial could keep 140million viewers talking about him for weeks. If it is possible, I think the campaign should do this.

 

[bklinker]

I can't hardly stand watching the "official" ads. They're a horrible insult to our generous contributions to the campaign imho. I would definitely have a lot of support for a strong, aggressive, exciting, revolution-themed ad during the superbowl.

 

[brutus1]

I don't think it'll do much since the audience just want to watch football =/

 

[Sesshomaru]

Why dont we get the operation broadcast people to make the ad and then either make a money bomb for it or ask the campaign to do it?

 

[prlgrl]

I don't think it'll do much since the audience just want to watch football =/

No, the ads are watched. The super bowl is the only time people actually stick around and watch them. I've been to parties where everyone stops talking to see the lates 'new' ad.

They are talked about before the game and analyzed after the game (well on the Monday morning programs anyway)

A very creative, funny spot... like something Jon Stewart would show making fun of the other candidates, then showing the seriousness of the issues and Ron Paul would be incredible.

Show the debates with them laughing, and Ron Paul saying... You think this is funny?

I don't know.

It's a thought, but it's really late to put something together.

 

[faisal]

Please follow this idea!!! It'll make the record books!

 

[hopeful]

A superbowl ad brings CREDIBILITY that the other low-budget methods cannot match. Think about what happened to godaddy.com when it put an ad up there...it became the most popular web hosting company around.

thats correct, but you have to admit they were very clever adds, not to mention one sexy hot woman (sex sells) That appeals to the mostly male viewers.

































t

 

[bucfish]

Make It funny as they love funny ads for the SuperBowl Trump his record and say Who is this "kook?" Then come out with his name, find out for yourself Google Ron Paul!!!