Student Loan Debt Slaves trade Sex for Freedom

bobbyw24

Banned
Joined
Sep 10, 2007
Messages
14,097
Seeking Arrangement: College Students Using 'Sugar Daddies' To Pay Off Loan Debt

In her profile on the site, Taylor describes herself as "a full-time college student studying psychology and looking to meet someone to help pay the bills." Photos on the site show her in revealing outfits, a mane of caramel-colored hair framing her face. But unlike other dating sites, where a user might also list preferred hobbies or desired traits, Taylor instead indicates preferences for a "sugar daddy" and an "arrangement" in the range of $1,000 to $3,000 a month.

Saddled with piles of student debt and a job-scarce, lackluster economy, current college students and recent graduates are selling themselves to pursue a diploma or pay down their loans. An increasing number, according to the the owners of websites that broker such hook-ups, have taken to the web in search of online suitors or wealthy benefactors who, in exchange for sex, companionship, or both, might help with the bills.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/07/29/seeking-arrangement-college-students_n_913373.html
 
And the banker's plan for the higher education system is complete.
 
I suddenly have the urge to win the lottery..

Of course the first thing I'd do is pay off my student loans :p
 
Sex by itself doesn't bring true happiness, but you won't find true happiness without it.

Yes you can be truly happy without sex. Happiness is not dependant on sex. Happiness is dependant on truly knowing Christ. You can be truly happy without ever having sex.

This is not to downplay sex as a blessing from God in the marriage covenant, its just to say happiness does not depend on it.
 
Simply this can be summed up as individuals looking for a bailout for a stupid investment.

The 'above board' method is to get married to some one and dump it on the other person - pass the buck. In developed countries the women come with a debt dowry. In India the women come with actual wealth (gold). Needless to say, this phenomenon is just a symptom of the economic situation. The necessary liquidation of mal-investments can take many forms (crashing housing prices, education prices vs. return).

Minimum education requirements act much like minimum wage laws - they benefit the university/higher education complex and force people who want over the ever rising minimum education wall to take on greater debt to even get work.

Learning through apprenticeship, hence actually doing the work at a reduced rate in exchange for learning and developing skills, has all but been destroyed.
 
Last edited:
I think you are overlooking an option available to you.....sugarbaby....

Ya, ya know, I was thinking about different options of how you could have some sort of sex commune type place if prostitution were made legal. Of course it wouldn't be a "commune", by definition, but it would open up a lot of free market options for people to trade.

Let's say everybody who enters gets a score from 0.0 - 10.0 on their attractiveness, taking into consideration age, sex, appearance and general physical attractiveness, etc.. (females get extra points because, well, not many women need to pay for sex).

So let's say someone goes in and they are scored as a 7.5

They could find a 5.5 (-2), have sex with that person (assuming both parties consent), and then because their score is (-2), they get a +1 (divide the negative score by 2 and flip the sign positive, this allows for the organization to collect fees off of sexual transactions that don't include direct monetary transactions). So that means they can get a free session with an 8.5.

The 8.5 then gets a (-1) score, so they trade that for a + 0.5. Being an 8.5, they can now either have sex with a 9.0 or trade the + 0.5 for some cash.

Where does the cash come from?

Well, someone who has money who is, say, a 4.5 comes in. If they want to have sex with an 6.5, they either have to pay 2 points worth of credits, or have sex with a 0.5. Ouch, tough decision. So either they pay, or the 0.5 pays, and the money goes up the chain to the person at the top.

The scoring of individuals may have to be adjusted to reflect pricing and demand.

The idea is that a person who is reasonably attractive can come in and trade their services to someone less attractive, who will ultimately have to pay, and then they can get services from someone who is more attractive, who will ultimately get paid.

What this allows for is someone, like that 7.5 who might normally not be on the market to sell their services, to come in and put out for someone who is less attractive and isn't necessarily looking for that super expensive 9.5 to be with. So they can spend less money, be with the 7.5, then the 7.5 can get with the 9.5. This helps the psyche of the 9.5 who doesn't have to get with the 5.5 and merely has to tolerate a 7.5, and are willing to get less $$ for doing so. Everybody benefits.
 
Simply this can be summed up as individuals looking for a bailout for a stupid investment.

The 'above board' method is to get married to some one and dump it on the other person - pass the buck. In developed countries the women comes with a debt dowry. In India the women comes with actual wealth (gold). Needless to say, this phenomenon is just a symptom of the economic situation.

Yes. Very true.
 
Simply this can be summed up as individuals looking for a bailout for a stupid investment.

The 'above board' method is to get married to some one and dump it on the other person - pass the buck. In developed countries the women come with a debt dowry. In India the women come with actual wealth (gold). Needless to say, this phenomenon is just a symptom of the economic situation. The necessary liquidation of mal-investments can take many forms (crashing housing prices, education prices vs. return).

Minimum education requirements act much like minimum wage laws - they benefit the university/higher education complex and force people who want over the ever rising minimum education wall to take on greater debt to even get work.

Learning through apprenticeship, hence actually doing the work at a reduced rate in exchange for learning and developing skills, has all but been destroyed.
qft!
 
Back
Top