green73
Member
- Joined
- Dec 3, 2007
- Messages
- 13,670
It's not so much adding pro-liberty votes but it's the amount of active activists engaged in testifying against anti-liberty legislation/in favor of pro-liberty legislation, a growing agorist economy, social networking for liberty-minded people, activists re-engaging some elements of a former dormant NH liberty native mindset, making pro-liberty media, some resemblance of civil disobedience where applicable, electing pro-liberty politicians to the legislature and other areas. The FSP was key in revving up support for Ron in the last few elections and most likely will be a hand to Rand should he decide to run, tho not all ancaps will be involved as we see here on these forums. I'm sure there are other areas of success that I'm not thinking of. There's also a heavy adoption for PMs and BTC holders/transactions.So is this working? I just looked it up and 650k+ people voted for president in 2012, how much good will 20k votes do?
Not trying to sound facetious. Just curious.
Ah I understand. These liberty minded people will be far more active on the political scene then. How close to the 20,000 people in NH is it?It's not so much adding pro-liberty votes but it's the amount of active activists engaged in testifying against anti-liberty legislation/in favor of pro-liberty legislation, a growing agorist economy, social networking for liberty-minded people, activists re-engaging some elements of a former dormant NH liberty native mindset, making pro-liberty media, some resemblance of civil disobedience where applicable, electing pro-liberty politicians to the legislature and other areas. The FSP was key in revving up support for Ron in the last few elections and most likely will be a hand to Rand should he decide to run, tho not all ancaps will be involved as we see here on these forums. I'm sure there are other areas of success that I'm not thinking of. There's also a heavy adoption for PMs and BTC holders/transactions.
In 10 years since it started.14K people have pledged to move so far
1,100 have moved already
So is this working? I just looked it up and 650k+ people voted for president in 2012, how much good will 20k votes do?
Not trying to sound facetious. Just curious.
Free State Project is strategically unviable except as far as it works from a marketing perspective. And from that angle I think it works against us. What's the message? People who care about and understand liberty would rather abandon you to an oppressive system than try to help you free yourself from it.
On one hand, it could be said that super activists are being depleted from states around the country in favor of NH. OTOH, some of the movers or signers could be just low-key people that just want more freedoms yet aren't really active at all. Some like doing protests yet do next to nothing in terms of politicking for repeal of laws or passage of good ones that enhance freedoms. The idea is to showcase a state that's been through this experiment of liberty and perhaps it will rub off on other states when people see why low taxes and other freedoms are beneficial. This may not happen because there's a limited amount of people in each state that are active compared to the overwhelming majority that sit on their asses and could give a flip. The secession mindset is quite high amongst most of the movers as well as the native liberty lovers but I would offer nullification as the best and likely maneuver in favor of getting the Fed gov't off your ass in many instances. The FSP ultimately is an engine that entices those that care about liberty to move to NH and saturate this small state w/ libertarians which is pretty unheard of in modern times. There was a hippy wave that gravitated to Vermont over the years and you see how that's played out. I surmise that NH will have it's own libertarian image in the next few decades if not sooner, what it has now is a 'liberty-leaning in certain areas' atmosphere to it. So, those with a selfish liberty interest that they want to pursue with a decent chance of living more free as time goes on, perhaps those types will go FSP.Free State Project is strategically unviable except as far as it works from a marketing perspective. And from that angle I think it works against us. What's the message? People who care about and understand liberty would rather abandon you to an oppressive system than try to help you free yourself from it.
I just used votes for president as a general idea of those who are politically active. At least in the major elections.People wondering about the open containers in a city council meeting, no, it wasn't alcohol or anything illegal. About the indecent exposure and firearms possession, firearms possession is obviously legal. A female was cited for indecent exposure because the cop that arrested her was unaware that it is perfectly legal to be topless in Keene. The prosecutor knew that he was in the wrong and he dropped the charges.
As for is it working, yes. The goal was to get 20,000 signers and then encourage them to move to NH within 5 years. The FSP is already up to 14,000 signers. But out of those 14,000, over 1,000 have already moved to NH, early, before the move was supposed to even start.
I see that you talked about the general election for President. That means you don't understand the basic concept of the FSP. Here is my personal interpretation of it.
Every year in America, we tend to lose more and more freedom. Perhaps small freedoms are gained from time to time, but over time, freedom decreases. Wouldn't you agree? (At that point in a conversation, every single person I've ever talked to the FSP about has agreed with me that freedom is on the decline.)
Then I point out that people have been trying different strategies, tactics and so on for 100s of years to increase freedom and yet the size, scope and debt of government continues to grow. You are aware that the national debt continues to grow, correct? (At this point in a conversation, the person agrees.) All past methods have not only failed, but government has continued to grow. The current path is not sustainable. We must reserve the course but no one has an effective idea on how to do that.
How would you like to be part of the solution? How would you like liberty in your lifetime? How would you like to move your family to the place with the lowest crime, the lowest poverty, the fewest problems, the lowest taxes and the most freedom in the US and once there, work to reform society and bring back freedom and liberty? There is a plan to do just that. It is to use a new method that has never been tried before. It takes the best from all of the previously failed tactics and methods and amplifies those good parts in a concentrated geographic area, while creating new methods and techniques at the same time. The idea is the Free State Project, the time is now and the state is New Hampshire.
Yes, 100s. FSPers have also won around 100 elections, including 19 state rep races. Parents can get paid to homeschool their children in NH and the laws are quite lax now (not the best in the country but well above average) when they used to be below average. A none-state rep FSPer even wrote 1 of the good homeschooling bills that passed. Gun laws are arguably the best in the US in NH and FSPers have helped Republicans and Democrats pass several gun laws in recent years. Knife laws are best in the US, thanks to a fsper.Has any state pro liberty ideas actually passed NH?
Vermont style carry?
Texas or Alaskan style homeschooling ?
Property tax elimination?
Anything
It didn't do well in the which state vote. It didn't really have any vocal supporters because well, it didn't deserve any. The top liberty activists in the world spent 1000s of hours doing researched and all of the research showed ID was a bad choice. Much of the research is still online if you dig around the FSP website. Of course, looking at things now, there isn't really a need to do much research. It's pretty obvious the NH was the right choice.Should have chosen Idaho.