Stossel on O'Reilly RIGHT NOW making the case for Ron Paul

Esoteric

Banned
Joined
May 30, 2011
Messages
1,955
As the title says. Coulter just bashed Ron about gay marriage answer, now Stossel is coming on.
 
yeah watching, billo can't understand what ron was saying lmao
I believe Coulter called ron a coward as well

Of all words to use... coward... To say something in a republican debate that goes against the grain of the mainstream Republican voter... makes you a coward... really?
 
What bullshit.. And sorry but stossel kinda blows at defending us sometimes..
 
Because small government conservatives support Big Government when it comes to licensing.--lol...
 
What bullshit.. And sorry but stossel kinda blows at defending us sometimes..


Stossel is the phony house Libertarian, it's his job to come up big and make the "far right" look bad at just the right time. In this instance he made Ron Paul look VERY bad.
 
yeah- just a humorous side story..ol' ron paul...good for a light segment in order to ridicule silly libertarians.
 
yeah- just a humorous side story..ol' ron paul...good for a light segment in order to ridicule silly libertarians.

Kruthhammer just bahed Ron AGAIN on O'Reilly - for his philosophy, and rambling. I'm watching this with my dad, who I'm trying to convert, and it's not looking good. Stossel didn't have anything of substance to add to Ron's defense.
 
Kruthhammer just bahed Ron AGAIN on O'Reilly - for his philosophy, and rambling. I'm watching this with my dad, who I'm trying to convert, and it's not looking good. Stossel didn't have anything of substance to add to Ron's defense.

Don't fret turning your dad around. best thing you can do with your dad to convert him is to turn off the tv and go outside and do something productive with him.

No seriously, how many times has your dad been treated this exact same way in his career by some pinhead bosses who don't know their ass from a hole in the ground. Bashing Ron Paul is a good way for the other side to help us convert our family and friends IMO.
 
Stossel's is terrific when he does his hour long specials, but when he has guest appearances on other shows he is very lackluster. His basic talking point is: government shouldn't be involved in Topic A, B, C and that's it. Then when the host goes to rebut and says crazy shit that they know is a false characterization, like not wanting people to afford medical care or wanting free drugs and prostitutes for children or not caring about the "terror threat", Stossel doesn't really do anything except shrug his shoulders and say "shouldn't be involved". Wonder why Judge Nap never gets a spot on ORLY's show? Because he wouldn't put up with his shit and would set people straight.
 
Ughhh...

Where is Tom Woods when you need him?:(

Yeah...I also think schiff would be the best guest to represent paul on shows like oreilly. He is one of the best debaters I have seen defending libertarian and austrian philosophies. He would destroy krauthammer and coulter especially concerning economic issues.
 
People, this is good news. They are spending all of this time bashing RP and bringing up silly polls! They wouldn't even mention him in 08! Believe me, this is a good sign and will get a lot more people talking about libertarian ideas.
 
People, this is good news. They are spending all of this time bashing RP and bringing up silly polls! They wouldn't even mention him in 08! Believe me, this is a good sign and will get a lot more people talking about libertarian ideas.

I disagree. If paul stands any shot at winning the nomination he will have to get good airtime on FOX news. If oreilly, hannity, etc....continue to bash him he will have no shot. I would bet that more than 95% of the people voting in those primaries watch fox and believe it to be gospel.
 
Back
Top