Stormfront members disillusioned Ron Paul is not a white nationalist

Great, the idea of countries is silly.
Click to expand...

Paulitician said:
yeah I agree
Click to expand...

Still, countries allow the advantage of compartmentalization. IMO, they are like bulkheads in a ship. If the whole globe was under a world government, where could you go to escape the tyranny when it came? Or were you joking? :confused: My sarcasm detector is broken today.
 
Paulitician said:
Because Ron thinks we're stronger for embracing diversity

Didn't these dodos know that Ronnie is philosophically for complete open borders [at least that's how he ran in '88 but has since changed his position for pragmatic reasons] and finds racism "ugly"? Just felt like pointing this out for the lulz :D
Click to expand...

The uneducated, jobless, loser racists (yeah, I know, thats redundant) who hang out at "stormfront" aren't known for their scintillating intellect...
 
I believe there's little evidence that diversity is all it's cracked up to be. It's a very safe slogan to spout off and much appreciated by the opinion makers in the country, though. Are we truly better off as a nation since the racial composition has been radically altered? The most diverse state in the nation, California, has fallen from (I believe) 10th rated in education to 48th. And the state is drowning in debt.

I also believe that "embracing diversity" is really in direct contradiction to the pursuit of individual liberty and a colorblind society. If skin color truly doesn't matter, then what is there to embrace one way or the other?

Without getting hateful and referring to folks who dare to question the pro-diversity rhetoric as knuckle-dragging morons, what specific evidence is there that we've benefitted from it as a nation? Certainly the gay rights movement didn't benefit from it where in California black folks and Hispanics voted as a majority for the ban on gay marriage (blacks voted 70% to 30& for), while whites as a majority opposed it. While that's one small example, some of the people most likely to cheerlead diversity are doing so in opposition to their own interests.

I still maintain that individual liberty and colorblindness is the real answer here, and maybe even an honest assessment of whether or not actually celebrating diversity and multiculturalism is beneficial.
 
Diversity is racism. White Power is racism. Only individualism is not racism. The thinkers of old, in the 1960s, understood this.
 
newyearsrevolution08 said:
Yes but borders do not mean walls or fences either.


We need borders but people always try and assume it to be a separatist movement or isolationism. Those on stormfront have their opinion just like everyone else does according to this great country and why is it that so many so called "Freedom lovers" are so quick to trash ANY OTHER thought or ideals that are different than their own? Not seeing what the difference is at all.

Who cares what some nazi's think?
Who cares what some black panther wannabe thinks?

that is their own right and if they look at ron paul as a person who can allow them to enjoy their freedoms and rights to their own point of view then by all means let them call him as they want. Thats just one opinion that differs from many others.

who cares.....

As long as you don't HARM, HURT or reduce someone elses rights then I don't care if you walk around with a "I hate whitey" flag in front of me.
Click to expand...


Why we care? Because they are hate-mongering imbeciles who aren't very popular and when a group like that lies about Ron Paul being some white nationalist than that sways people away from us. We'd like some more Ron Paul supporters, please.
 
FrankRep said:
I don't get it. Stormfront thought Ron Paul was secretly racist or something?
Click to expand...

due to b.s. writings that were done on his newsletter as well as I think a vote or two of his that were about "rights".

It is just the same as someone voting against something called the "save the children from rapists" act and voting against it due to unconstitutional standings versus a "moral" ground and everyone assuming you feel that rapists should be able to keep doing what they are doing.

People who only look on the surface whether with a person, a bill or a vote deserves everything they get.

Like that damn patriot act... what you aren't a patriot! lol

damn sheeple can assume all they want BUT what is the point in hating them for their views? It seems like it is exactly the same deal, don't call it reverse racism lol....
 
So you guys adore the founding fathers right?

None of you realize that they were just a tiny bit racially aware?

;)

I'm not picking any side. I'm just pointing out the obvious. (Or what I thought was obvious).
 
dwdollar said:
So you guys adore the founding fathers right?
Click to expand...

Who are "you guys"?

I dislike many of the founding fathers. George Washington, Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and Federalists in general are able to evoke grimaces from me when mentioned. Henry Clay and his cronies piss me off as well, but that isn't until the next "political generation".
 
Paulitician said:
I should have probably worded that differently. He didn't believe in having any restrictions on immigration.
Click to expand...

He doesnt support any restrictions on immigration, but he wants to eliminate the incentives to come over here. Welfare, free healthcare, etc. If those things were eliminated then the free market would welcome cheap labor. In the words of the man, they are scapegoats of our socialist welfare system.
 
Minuteman2008 said:
I believe there's little evidence that diversity is all it's cracked up to be. It's a very safe slogan to spout off and much appreciated by the opinion makers in the country, though. Are we truly better off as a nation since the racial composition has been radically altered? The most diverse state in the nation, California, has fallen from (I believe) 10th rated in education to 48th. And the state is drowning in debt.

I also believe that "embracing diversity" is really in direct contradiction to the pursuit of individual liberty and a colorblind society. If skin color truly doesn't matter, then what is there to embrace one way or the other?

Without getting hateful and referring to folks who dare to question the pro-diversity rhetoric as knuckle-dragging morons, what specific evidence is there that we've benefitted from it as a nation? Certainly the gay rights movement didn't benefit from it where in California black folks and Hispanics voted as a majority for the ban on gay marriage (blacks voted 70% to 30& for), while whites as a majority opposed it. While that's one small example, some of the people most likely to cheerlead diversity are doing so in opposition to their own interests.

I still maintain that individual liberty and colorblindness is the real answer here, and maybe even an honest assessment of whether or not actually celebrating diversity and multiculturalism is beneficial.
Click to expand...

Just check out this video:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kMSS2qoLdoA
 
The replies on there are too funny! I can't believe these people really think like this. And post about it on the web! HAHAHA
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Anti Federalist
How Tucker Carlson Stoked White Fear to Conquer Cable
2
Replies
39
Views
3K
Anti Federalist
Anti Federalist
ammodotcom
Righteousness + Force in America: The Trap of Activism Coupled with Power
Replies
4
Views
984
ammodotcom
ammodotcom
Anti Federalist
Pearl Harbor: Hawaii Was Surprised; FDR Was Not
Replies
12
Views
1K
Pauls' Revere
Pauls' Revere
PierzStyx
How America Came To Be A Democratic Socialist Empire
Replies
1
Views
1K
PierzStyx
PierzStyx
Swordsmyth
Pearl Harbor: Hawaii Was Surprised; FDR Was Not
Replies
4
Views
2K
Aratus
A
Back
Top