Stop the boycott! KEEP RON PAUL OUT

[Pete Kay]

The exclusion of Ron Paul from the NH Presidential forums brings more attention to not only Ron Paul, but also to the blatant bias of the media towards him. If we want more people to wake up to the media manipulation, then let them exclude Ron Paul. If he is invited because of our actions, FOX will try to make him look like a fool as they always do and they will give him limited speaking time. We are better off with Ron Paul excluded.

Look at how this exclusion has fired us up! Let's use it to our advantage. Admit it to yourselves - we don't want to be part of that bunch anyway. Ron Paul's message is unique and special to this Presidential race. Why mix it in with the neo-con rhetoric of the other candidates? Our best bet is to hold a huge rally right after the forum and steal attention away from the others.

 

[nyrgoal99]

Interesting thought, but i still think it helps if he is in

 

[akijikan]

Typical FoxNews watcher doesn't think like that. If they don't see RP, they don't think about him.

 

[2young2vote]

So who is actually in the debate?

 

[eldeeder]

I dont think the typical fox news watcher would really even think of voting for paul. "Foxnews watcher"

man, that term is sad. Has our country really come to that?

 

[Brad324]

the boycott is what will draw their attention to the exclusion.

 

[ChooseLiberty]

This is also about giving Faux news a kick in the shins so they remember next time.

 

[Pete Kay]

Typical FoxNews watcher doesn't think like that. If they don't see RP, they don't think about him.

At this point in the game, we aren't seeking the support of the FOX News watchers. We want the more intelligent and enlightened to come on board. Those people aren't FOX News watchers anyway, and Ron Paul's exclusion will make news beyond the FOX News network.

If Ron Paul is invited, then it will be like he was never excluded. Most people will never know. If we boycott and Ron Paul is included, we lose. We win when he isn't there.

 

[Ryankelly]

I tend to agree. The Campaign could use this exclusion to our advantage. Develop an alternative event centered around free expression of ideas in elections. Ask Democratic candidates to participate. Invite the Republican candidates who will decline and go with FOX. Then when Dr. Paul gets Third in Iowa, Fox will be embarrassed into asking him into the Forum. But it will be too late. The alternative forum will be set.

Dr. Paul will not get the Neocon voters anyway. Let the other 5 duke it our on Fox for the neocons while Dr. Paul appeals to the free spirited voters of N.H.

 

[Yom]

It won't just be drawing in typical Faux News watchers, though. This is a roundtable discussion of all the "major" Republican Presidential Candidates. Even people who don't usually watch Faux will be tuning in.

 

[MsDoodahs]

This action of Murdochs is the straw that broke the camel's back.

Has nothing to do with Dr. Paul anymore.

Has to do with the trash that FoxNewsPorn is.

 

[azminuteman]

So who is actually in the debate?

Not Hunter, Not Paul

 

[Brad324]

Fox News does not want us to have an organized boycott. That should be all we need to base our decisions.

 

[Sey.Naci]

He is out. The RP Campaign is planning a rally at St. Anselm College instead, at exactly the time "fair and balanced" FAUX News will air its purported GOP forum. (Forum is the word; the event isn't a debate, with an audience.) See the thread titled Paul: Fox is scared of me.

 

[thuja]

you may be correct, but the boycott is more than this.

 

[freedom-maniac]

I dont think the typical fox news watcher would really even think of voting for paul. "Foxnews watcher"

The typical Fox News watcher doesn't think at all.

 

[thuja]

Fox News does not want us to have an organized boycott. That should be all we need to base our decisions.

they don't want us to??? oops! we are going to though.

 

[ConceivedInLiberty]

If CNN or MSNBC were smart they'd give the rally coverage, it would probably get equal or better ratings to the debate, and would make Fox look bad. Unfortunately, they're all owned by the same people and real competition wouldn't be a smart business tactic.

 

[worldtruthfreedom]

Great post and you're absolutely right.

If Dr.Paul can get into the debate through positive action - Great! If not - Use this decision by Fox to rally the people.

If we can get some of the other stations to run the Fox Bias story and have a massive counter demonstration on the day of the debates, then this will be much better publicity than the actual debates.

After all, people do not get behind someone moreso than when they see them being downtrodden as RP is - by the MSM.

The exclusion of Ron Paul from the NH Presidential forums brings more attention to not only Ron Paul, but also to the blatant bias of the media towards him. If we want more people to wake up to the media manipulation, then let them exclude Ron Paul. If he is invited because of our actions, FOX will try to make him look like a fool as they always do and they will give him limited speaking time. We are better off with Ron Paul excluded.

Look at how this exclusion has fired us up! Let's use it to our advantage. Admit it to yourselves - we don't want to be part of that bunch anyway. Ron Paul's message is unique and special to this Presidential race. Why mix it in with the neo-con rhetoric of the other candidates? Our best bet is to hold a huge rally right after the forum and steal attention away from the others.