Stimulus package will increase deficit, Obama adviser says

Anthony T

Member
Joined
Nov 28, 2007
Messages
193
Setting the stage for President-elect Barack Obama's rollout today of his economic team, one of his top advisers said this morning that he is committed to a stimulus plan to create and save 2.5 million jobs in the first two years of his administration.

But Austan Goolsbee refused to put a number on the package, with reports that it could total $700 billion or more over two years.

"Look, it needs to be as big a number as it needs to be. I really mean, it's got to meet the task at hand," Goolsbee said on MSNBC.

"The era of dithering that I said that coming to an end of January 20th is economic dithering, sitting, and waiting for crises to land on you and not doing anything to prevent them," he continued. "So as I said, we've tried not doing stimulus. We've tried not having a housing program. We've tried not giving tax relief to ordinary Americans. And if you look out on the window, that's not working out so well. So that era is going to end when Barack Obama becomes president."

On CNN, Goolsbee outlined what the stimulus package would include. "It ought to take the form, in President Obama's view, of investments in the things that we know we're going to need going forward, but investments that can take place within the next two years," he said, adding that it could entail "infrastructure spending on roads, bridges, schools; spending for green energy, renewable energy; tax cuts for ordinary Americans. Things of that nature that can get out the door within a short time frame, and really try to head off what is looking to be the most serious downturn in decades."

Goolsbee, an economist at the University of Chicago, acknowledged that it would increase the federal deficit, with some estimates that it will top $1 trillion in the fiscal year that ends next September.

"The thing with stimulus is, it is going to increase the deficit. That's what it has to do," he said.

"In the short run, we're facing a very large deficit, but it's one that we have to incur. Because if you try to reduce the deficit or balance the budget in the face of the stiffest recession in decades, you threaten to repeat the mistake that caused the Great Depression. They have a banking crash, and then Herbert Hoover starts trying to balance the budget and drives things further and further down the tubes," Goolsbee added.
 
"In the short run, we're facing a very large deficit, but it's one that we have to incur. Because if you try to reduce the deficit or balance the budget in the face of the stiffest recession in decades, you threaten to repeat the mistake that caused the Great Depression. They have a banking crash, and then Herbert Hoover starts trying to balance the budget and drives things further and further down the tubes," Goolsbee added.

This is going to be a fun one to throw back in their faces when our credit is so bad we can no longer give T-bills away.
 
I see the idea that "FDR saved us" is well ingrained in the minds of these clowns. Paul Krugman is probably advising.
 
I see the idea that "FDR saved us" is well ingrained in the minds of these clowns. Paul Krugman is probably advising.

Every single person I have encountered that lived during & remembered the FDR years, think he's the greatest thing since sliced bread.

People seem to love this Socialism... I could not believe at the FED demostration in San Francisco, I came across a senior citizen and was explaining everything to her... well, one thing lead to another, she voted her comgressional representative back into office, get this...

"Because she got me my PASSPORT I needed urgently for my vacation"

FDR, fast Passports... it's the "Conditioning of the People" to accept ANY policies/actions, even if it's a form of Socialism, Communism, etc.

Foolish Ignorant people... Government Indoctrination - from Cradle to Grave!
 
No question that increasing spending while cutting taxes will cause the deficit and debt to grow. We have seen that for the last eight years. Today they did say they would be looking at places they could cut some spending to try to offset some of the new spending (I am not convinced they can do enough to offset all of them- plus the fact that Congress writes the actual budget and likes to add in all kinds of things)>
 
Sounds like they're going to buy off the states and local governments. How much you wanna bet a good portion of that "stimulus package" is going to pay for more federalization and beefing up of our police forces? That's one way to "create new jobs", and ensure that tyranny lives long and prospers.

I feel like I'm living through a freakin' nightmare.
 
Sounds like they're going to buy off the states and local governments. How much you wanna bet a good portion of that "stimulus package" is going to pay for more federalization and beefing up of our police forces? That's one way to "create new jobs", and ensure that tyranny lives long and prospers.

I feel like I'm living through a freakin' nightmare.


Yep, I'll bet they'll NEVER cut those unfunded mandates, especially having to do with DHS, nor will they cut out any of our foreign adventures.

I think I'm living in the same freakin' nightmare you are.
 
No question that increasing spending while cutting taxes will cause the deficit and debt to grow. We have seen that for the last eight years. Today they did say they would be looking at places they could cut some spending to try to offset some of the new spending (I am not convinced they can do enough to offset all of them- plus the fact that Congress writes the actual budget and likes to add in all kinds of things)>

Past 8 years? Try the past 100 ;)
 
Back
Top