Statist censorship of pro liberty groups, blogs etc, increasing in social networks

[Christopher A. Brown]

I don't use facebook but Google search results certainly have changed

Yep, I've noticed the same thing. I've noticed a google site search will not find my threads at this forum since about 3 days ago.

I've noticed that my phone which has a service using AT&T equipment will no longer operate with any email except gmail. Since Saturday.

AT&T is a major contributor to ALEC who has twice been the target of a petition that I've made which asks them to give their opinion on the concept of preparatory amendment to Article V, which they are promoting. A thread about it.

http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showth...h-Constitutional-Intent&p=5431250#post5431250

 

[acptulsa]

Even if they are correct and WILL be the basis of effective defense of the constitution IF it is to be defended?

If I find such words, you won't have to put them in my mouth. I will say them myself. Every chance I get.

 

[Christopher A. Brown]

If I find such words, you won't have to put them in my mouth. I will say them myself. Every chance I get.

Is that another way to say that free speech DOES NOT have the root purpose of assuring information vital to survival is shared and understood?

 

[acptulsa]

Is that another way to say that free speech DOES NOT have the root purpose of assuring information vital to survival is shared and understood?

What does that have to do with an effective defense of the Constitution?

Never mind, you probably think you have an answer to that question, even though I disagree. So, I withdraw the question.

What do the things I say on this site have to do with censorship of social media? And if the answer is, as I suspect, 'Nothing,' then why are we hijacking Mr. Maister's thread?

In any case, I'm not going to jack it any more. Not even to entertain you.

 

[Christopher A. Brown]

What does that have to do with an effective defense of the constitution.

The purpose of free speech is pure, and prime, constitutional intent. The reasons the constitution is threatened is because prime intents of the constitution have been thwarted by the infiltration of government. Article V is the highest authority, fully over the congress, the courts and the potus. The first element of intent is needed to properly conduct Article V, free speech.
The first item of preparatory amendment is to end the abridging of free speech,

Here is the effective defense of the constitution spelled out in a fairly involved but simple process.

http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showth...V-convention&p=5433668&viewfull=1#post5433668

Here is the same strategy integrated into a political party that COMPLETELY leaves the box of partisan politics.

http://algoxy.com/poly/principal_party.html

I apologize for putting you on the spot like this, I can tell you're pissed. To me this is not about winning or losing an argument. It really is about unity.

So with that, I have to state I appreciate your persistence with your beliefs. It has made yet one more way to demonstrate this understanding I've developed. Your resistance to it perhaps epitomizes something that every freedom loving American feels when confronted with the question and list method I've developed to deal with this anonymous medium, that would have never been been addressed without you.

 

[acptulsa]

The purpose of free speech is...

...not to allow Christopher A. Brown to jack Meister's excellent thread at will for his own goofy purposes. Which is why you had to edit out of your quote of me the fact that I rather pointedly withdrew that question.

 

[Christopher A. Brown]

...not to allow Christopher A. Brown to jack Meister's excellent thread at will for his own goofy purposes. Which is why you had to edit out of your quote of me the fact that I rather pointedly withdrew that question.

PunkMiester can make his own complaints about topic adhesion in his thread. Since his thread is about FB censorship, the free speech discussion is not off topic.

Evasion takes many forms, and I know them all. As I said, the constitution is really the anarchists compromise for unity against government which oversteps natural law boundaries. So it is the best tool by far for that IF we can agree and keep it in control. All I'm doing is standing by a completely out-of-the-box strategy for doing that which is completely valid. It really is the anarchists tool, because it only depends on our human agreement..

Currently, the infiltration is not in control 100% because the 1787 constitution lives in peoples hearts and minds, so despite a fairly massive infiltration at this point, because so many people have that anarchistic love for freedom, we are not completely over run.

I personally cannot even understand facebook. The architecture of it makes no sense whatsoever for activism. Censorship I loath. That FB is doing it, makes me like the concept even less. Hearing they cooperate with the NSA adds to that. I personally would be just fine with dot com taking a second seat to the return of the usenet. Dot com is pure corruption.

This thread,

http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showth...ng-the-Abridging-of-free-speech-PREP-FOR-ART5

provides a draft revision of the First Amendment that would put dot com into the second position. Whereupon the usenet would return to first as it was in 1994. PunkMeister probably does not know about the usenet. It still existed after 1995, but people with apple computers had to use special software to use it, which I feel was intentional, along with the PC promoted against legal precedent by the US district court in 1993 by allowing microsoft to steal the apple operating system to make windows.