State Dept. wrote up tweets critical of Sen. Paul, CNN "reporter" tweeted them out on request

[KEEF]

So he can do it AGAIN!

True dat!

 

[limequat]

Here's a version from Reason a little more detail:
https://reason.com/blog/2015/11/25/cnn-correspondent-collaborated-with-hill

And one from the Blaze.
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/201...ith-clinton-aide-to-target-rand-paul-in-2013/


Please click all of these and drive up their google ratings!

 

[KEEF]

You know the icing on the cake, as well as some vindication, would be some leaked emails about any media blackouts on Ron Paul in 08 and 12.

 

[KEEF]

Here's a version from Reason a little more detail:
https://reason.com/blog/2015/11/25/cnn-correspondent-collaborated-with-hill

And one from the Blaze.
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/201...ith-clinton-aide-to-target-rand-paul-in-2013/


Please click all of thse and drive up their google ratings!

I just found the dumbest comment under the Blaze article... I about punched my laptop.

• 
  
  • 
    
    • [h=5]galicant wiseword[/h]-Nov. 25, 2015 at 12:22pm
      Exceptional,
      I like Rand, he just seems weak on foreign policy.
      There now that we got the compulsory RINO talking point against Rand out of the way….
      You are exactly right. The polls are a joke.
      Just so we are all on the same page: Rands foreign policy positions are some wacky hand-me-down ideas from his father about abiding by the constitution and not going to war without congressional approval.
      
      
      
      
      [1]
      
      
      
      
  
  
• 
  
  

Yes you read it correctly, abiding by the Constitution is wacky... God help us all.

 

[CPUd]

I just found the dumbest comment under the Blaze article... I about punched my laptop.



Yes you read it correctly, abiding by the Constitution is wacky... God help us all.

It was sarcasm.

 

[hells_unicorn]

Here's a version from Reason a little more detail:
https://reason.com/blog/2015/11/25/cnn-correspondent-collaborated-with-hill

And one from the Blaze.
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/201...ith-clinton-aide-to-target-rand-paul-in-2013/

Please click all of these and drive up their google ratings!

Done, it should likewise be noted that Rand's twitter page has also been proactive and has linked to the Daily Caller articles.

I just found the dumbest comment under the Blaze article... I about punched my laptop.

Yes you read it correctly, abiding by the Constitution is wacky... God help us all.

Glenn Beck has an uncanny ability for drawing in retards to his news outlets, though by and large the posters on The Blaze have been slightly less idiotic than the ones trolling Breitbart's page.

 

[KEEF]

It was sarcasm.

If it was, it didn't read that way. Blaze audience will read it exactly how it looked.

 

[Tinnuhana]

I hope Hillary's Dem opponents also pick up on this, since they could also be victims.

 

[squirl22]

This is at Foxnews.com which I found via a link on Yahoo News:

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/201...how-reporter-colluding-with-clinton-aide.html

 

[timosman]

Remember this at 1:10 - Rand Paul? + condescending smile

 

[hells_unicorn]

This is at Foxnews.com which I found via a link on Yahoo News:

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/201...how-reporter-colluding-with-clinton-aide.html

There are a ton of people commenting on this one, and some of the comments are look a bit promising (though there's plenty of stupidity to boot, of course). I think this is going to help Rand, and hopefully enough to keep him on the main debate stage.

 

[CPUd]

There are a ton of people commenting on this one, and some of the comments are look a bit promising (though there's plenty of stupidity to boot, of course). I think this is going to help Rand, and hopefully enough to keep him on the main debate stage.

Just about all the political comment sections are looking like this right now. All out war between leftys, freepers and trumpeters (AKA whitewingers).

 

[hells_unicorn]

Just about all the political comment sections are looking like this right now. All out war between leftys, freepers and trumpeters (AKA whitewingers).

I do sympathize with some of the Trump supporters sentiments on demographics (I think Trump is an absolute liar so I take everything he says on the subject with a massive grain of salt), but they've gotten a bit ridiculous of late. A lot of this is a credit to the obnoxiousness of Obama's racial politics, which has largely created a wedge between white and non-white groups that makes rational discourse all but impossible. Trump is capitalizing on peoples' anger on a very real problem, and sadly most are too blind to catch onto it. Then again, I was never terribly impressed with the Free Republic crowd, they've been in full retard mode ever since Ron Paul's 2008 campaign.

 

[CPUd]

I do sympathize with some of the Trump supporters sentiments on demographics (I think Trump is an absolute liar so I take everything he says on the subject with a massive grain of salt), but they've gotten a bit ridiculous of late. A lot of this is a credit to the obnoxiousness of Obama's racial politics, which has largely created a wedge between white and non-white groups that makes rational discourse all but impossible. Trump is capitalizing on peoples' anger on a very real problem, and sadly most are too blind to catch onto it. Then again, I was never terribly impressed with the Free Republic crowd, they've been in full retard mode ever since Ron Paul's 2008 campaign.

It's not anger they're capitalizing on, it's hate.

 

[hells_unicorn]

It's not anger they're capitalizing on, it's hate.

One is form, the other is function. Furthermore, hate is occasionally justified, depending on the nature of the subject.

 

[PCKY]

I do sympathize with some of the Trump supporters sentiments on demographics (I think Trump is an absolute liar so I take everything he says on the subject with a massive grain of salt), but they've gotten a bit ridiculous of late. A lot of this is a credit to the obnoxiousness of Obama's racial politics, which has largely created a wedge between white and non-white groups that makes rational discourse all but impossible. Trump is capitalizing on peoples' anger on a very real problem, and sadly most are too blind to catch onto it. Then again, I was never terribly impressed with the Free Republic crowd, they've been in full retard mode ever since Ron Paul's 2008 campaign.

That's what my Twitter feed looks like most of the time.

 

[PCKY]

Hit it up before then in case Rand doesn't make the main card. Might even be better for him to hit it now with people not trusting the press and may give him a good bump so that he does make the main card.

Doug Stafford seems to be coordinating the campaign into having some leverage with CNN one way or the other. If Rand doesn't make the poll numbers required using this as evidence of a contrived effort to keep him out. If he does then using this as leverage to get more time. Brilliant!
Here's the quote: ” Doug Stafford said in a statement. “This email revelation should give Republicans pause as to their coverage and possibility of fair treatment towards Sen. Paul during the next debate. All eyes will be on CNN’s response to their employee colluding with Hillary Clinton in order to attack a prominent U.S. senator on their dime."

 

[KEEF]

Doug Stafford seems to be coordinating the campaign into having some leverage with CNN one way or the other. If Rand doesn't make the poll numbers required using this as evidence of a contrived effort to keep him out. If he does then using this as leverage to get more time. Brilliant!

Leverage into center podium

 

[squirl22]

Doug Stafford seems to be coordinating the campaign into having some leverage with CNN one way or the other. If Rand doesn't make the poll numbers required using this as evidence of a contrived effort to keep him out. If he does then using this as leverage to get more time. Brilliant!

Yes, Rand's campaign should be doing this. CNN is going to look very very bad if Rand is not included on the main stage.