Start documenting media bias against RP in this thread, NOW

[speciallyblend]

here is someone spreading lies on face book link and id
Mikey Michaels http://www.newsrealblog.com/2011/02/...-of-the-right/
The Anti-Semites Who Swarmed Us at CPAC and the Future of the Right | NewsReal Blog
www.newsrealblog.com
Ron Paul's Anti-Semitic Movement Exposed

DJKBK Kenny
@UnfairCoverage http://www.newsrealblog.com/2011/02/...-of-the-right/ FBMikey Michaels this user is anti-ron paul and is spreading this bs on facebook

viewed by many in the ron paul colorado tea party movement. the northern tea party is ron paul minus a few neo-cons like mikey!! this is a favorable site to ron paul republicans

http://www.facebook.com/?ref=logo#!/...o/158932334086

 

[malkusm]

AP Story on 2012 mentions 9 potential candidates, but not Ron Paul (3/8/2011):
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20110308/ap_on_el_ge/us_white_house_bid_first_steps

Washington Post excludes Ron Paul from GOP primary poll; 8 candidates included (3/16/2011):
http://www.washingtonpost.com/polit...primary-field/2011/03/15/ABCsQaa_graphic.html

 

[fatjohn]

CBS/NY times poll:

Neither Ron Paul nor former New Mexico Gov. Gary Johnson were included in the poll.

http://www.americanindependent.com/...s-lukewarm-on-entire-field-of-2012-candidates

 

[fatjohn]

http://www.nationaljournal.com/pict...tential-2012-presidential-candidates-20110421

An introduction of GOP candidates with gary johnson, john huntsman, mitch daniels and everybody else.

Ow except ron paul of course. And to be fair no sarah palin, but she's not really hinting about running any more.

 

[malkusm]

http://www.nationaljournal.com/pict...tential-2012-presidential-candidates-20110421

An introduction of GOP candidates with gary johnson, john huntsman, mitch daniels and everybody else.

Ow except ron paul of course. And to be fair no sarah palin, but she's not really hinting about running any more.

Thanks fatjohn. Added to the OP.

 

[playboymommy]

http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0411/53570.html

no mention of Ron Paul

 

[malkusm]

National Journal's "Meet the GOP's Potential Candidates" highlights 10 candidates, not Ron Paul (4/21/2011):
http://www.nationaljournal.com/pict...tential-2012-presidential-candidates-20110421

Politico summarizes NH poll that includes Ron Paul without mentioning him (4/22/2011):
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0411/53570.html
http://www.politico.com/static/PPM191_stateofthestate.html

 

[Chowder]

RonPaulWiki.org

This site is in dire need of updates. There's nothing newer there since 2008.

 

[fatjohn]

http://www.duluthnewstribune.com/event/article/id/197360/group/Opinion/

What an outright lie, saying that ron and rand blame the debt on democrats only. Where do they get this?

 

[rp08orbust]

An outright hit-piece:

hxxp://www.capitolhillblue.com/node/40580

Twice failed Presidential candidate Ron Paul is planning another long-shot run for the White House...

...Paul converted $4 million in remaining campaign funds to start a new advocacy group, Ron Paul’s Campaign for Liberty, leading some to question whether his Presidential campaign was a serious effort or just a fundraising scheme...[WTF?!?!]

...In 2008, James Kirchick, contributing editor for the New Republic magazine, wrote that Paul had an “obsession with conspiracies, sympathy for the right-wing militia movement, and deeply held bigotry against blacks, Jews, and gays.”

...Paul is a favorite of the extreme right-wing of the GOP and tea party advocates. Polls suggest a campaign for President will be — like his others — a lost cause and a third strike.

 

[Tal]

I saw this poll on the Daily Show, so obvious that the CNN editing room has been deliberatly editing that poll chart to make Ron Paul look like an outsider with no chance to win, I mean if you read the numbers the way its normal to read Ron Paul comes out looking really bad.

 

[Mini-Me]

I saw this poll on the Daily Show, so obvious that the CNN editing room has been deliberatly editing that poll chart to make Ron Paul look like an outsider with no chance to win, I mean if you read the numbers the way its normal to read Ron Paul comes out looking really bad.

LOL, good catch! The normal order is row-major, where they'd use 2 rows of 4 and another row of 2:
Trump, Huckabee, Palin, Gingrich
Romney, Paul, Bachmann, Daniels
Pawlenty, Santorum

or 2 rows of 5:
Trump, Huckabee, Palin, Gingrich, Romney
Paul, Bachmann, Daniels, Pawlenty, Santorum

If they were unbiased but wanted to make things column major, they would have used 5 columns of 2
Trump, Palin, Romney, Bachmann, Pawlenty
Huckabee, Gingrich, Paul, Daniels, Santorum

However, making Paul like he came third-last just wasn't good enough for them. Instead, they decided on 3-person columns. The CONSISTENT way of doing 3-person columns would be 3 columns of 3 and 1 left over on the right:
Trump, Huckabee, Palin
Gingrich, Romney, Paul
Bachmann, Daniels, Pawlenty
Santorum

...but nooooo, they just had to use the above order...yet the only logical reason to use it is to make Ron Paul look like he's in last place (if you ignore the numbers). They did use a decent picture of him though, at least.

 

[malkusm]

Rush Limbaugh looking for "Bold GOP Leader" to run in 2012; names 5 potential candidates, omits the Pauls (4/26/2011):
http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/daily/site_042611/content/01125108.guest.html

 

[malkusm]

David Horowitz falsely claims "Ron Paul would open America's doors to Sharia" (4/29/2011):
http://www.newsrealblog.com/2011/04/29/1-69/

New York Times: "Republicans Pursuing a Wider Field" - names 12 candidates, not Ron Paul (5/1/2011):
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/05/01/us/politics/01republicans.html?_r=1&hp

Matt Taibbi of Rolling Stone: Ron Paul's constitutionalist rhetoric a "convenient mask for racial-resentment politics (5/3/2011):
http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/blogs/taibblog/mailbag-why-i-cant-vote-for-ron-paul-20110502

LA Times on South Carolina debate: Pawlenty the "only top tier candidate expected to appear" despite Paul polling higher (5/3/2011):
http://articles.latimes.com/2011/may/03/news/la-pn-fox-south-carolina-debate-20110503

Fox News previews their own debate: Mentions every participating candidate except Ron Paul (5/4/2011):
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WFMSL2wuAys

New York Times spins Paul's heroin response, saying Paul "brought up the issue" (5/5/2011):
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/05/06/us/politics/06repubs.html?_r=2&hp

Chris Malagisi (CPAC Chair) of Washington Examiner: "Ron Paul wins the Democrat Presidential Debate" (5/6/2011):
http://washingtonexaminer.com/blogs...aul-wins-democrat-presidential-debate-oh-wait

Byron York of Washington Examiner reviews South Carolina debate without mentioning Ron Paul (5/6/2011):
http://washingtonexaminer.com/polit...ty-underwhelms-cain-struggles-santorum-scores

CNN's Howard Kurtz calls Ron Paul a "sideshow" (5/8/2011):
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JdtX3MAgpzw

WMUR TV9 in New Hampshire, hosts of the CNN GOP debate, leave Ron Paul off list of linked candidates (5/8/2011):
http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showth...mits-hyper-link-for-Ron-Paul-among-candidates
http://a7.sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hpho...79871591_184680868237609_504130_6245284_n.jpg

AP runs down those who have entered the GOP race, excludes Ron Paul (5/9/2011):
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20110510/ap_on_el_ge/us_gingrich2012

Michael Gerson of Washington Post: "Ron Paul's Land of Second Rate Values (5/9/2011):
http://www.washingtonpost.com/opini...nd-rate-values/2011/05/09/AFD8B2bG_story.html

Brent Budowsky of The Hill: "Ron Paul's godless goddess of greed, Ayn Rand" (hit piece) (5/10/2011):
http://thehill.com/blogs/pundits-bl...9-ron-pauls-godless-goddess-of-greed-ayn-rand

NBC Nightly News piece on the 2012 GOP race takes clips out of context and other shenanigans (5/11/2011):
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-jmPwIRjX90

Don Imus: Ron Paul is "a loser" who is not worthy to appear on Fox News Sunday (5/12/2011):
http://video.foxbusiness.com/v/4690952/ron-paul-tops-guest-list-on-fox-news-sunday

Media Research Center reviews questions asked to Paul on his "Good Morning America" appearance (5/13/2011):
http://www.mrc.org/biasalert/2011/20110513010050.aspx?utm_source=twitterfeed&utm_medium=twitter

LA Times blog: "Who cares that he's seeking the Republican nomination?" (5/13/2011):
http://opinion.latimes.com/opinionl...n.html?cid=6a00d8341c7de353ef0154324a37b5970c

George Stephanopoulos repeatedly spins the truth on Ron Paul in his blog (5/13/2011):
http://blogs.abcnews.com/george/2011/05/rep-ron-paul.html#tp
http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?292607-Stephanopolous-post-interview-blog-spin

 

[malkusm]

Missed this one several weeks ago:

Capitol Hill Blue: "Ron Paul prepares another long-shot run for the White House" - extremely biased (4/26/2011):
http://www.capitolhillblue.com/node/40580

 

[malkusm]

http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_162-20066480-503544.html

 

[someoldbird]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2SyHW_dQIh8

 

[someoldbird]

this guy was small time but you check it - http://www.facebook.com/RonPaulPolls/posts/195641880481983?notif_t=like

 

[michigan wolverine]

The title of this thread should be changed. It should read "Ron Paul Supporters Blame Media For Loss." And there hasn't been a single vote cast in a primary or a caucus. It's time to stop whining about the media and create a positive mind set with the media. I have already listen to 15 or so RP supporters on radio shows. And every one of them has called in with a chip on their shoulder. Not good! Work for positive change by being more courteous to the host and listeners of the programs you call into. It is the same 2008 and my post will not change the vast majority of people here. I have not committed to any candidate in the Republican primary. As things stand now Congressman Paul will not be getting any financial support from me because of this. In the past I have been generous with my support. Congressman Paul has always stressed that people need to take responsibility for their lives. And here we already see people looking to place blame on others.

 

[Tal]

The title of this thread should be changed. It should read "Ron Paul Supporters Blame Media For Loss." And there hasn't been a single vote cast in a primary or a caucus. It's time to stop whining about the media and create a positive mind set with the media. I have already listen to 15 or so RP supporters on radio shows. And every one of them has called in with a chip on their shoulder. Not good! Work for positive change by being more courteous to the host and listeners of the programs you call into. It is the same 2008 and my post will not change the vast majority of people here. I have not committed to any candidate in the Republican primary. As things stand now Congressman Paul will not be getting any financial support from me because of this. In the past I have been generous with my support. Congressman Paul has always stressed that people need to take responsibility for their lives. And here we already see people looking to place blame on others.

Meh seems to have worked for black people.