STARK WARNING: Trump threatens to strike Iran ‘1,000 times’ harder

Joined
Mar 17, 2013
Messages
28,575
STARK WARNING: Trump threatens to strike Iran ‘1,000 times’ harder

Some had suggested that recent biggest increases in military spending in history could be preparation for mideast military escalations after 2020 elections, but recent escalations of 'sanctions' aka 'acts of war' and rising tensions were not predicted by MSM pundits.


Trump threatens to strike Iran ‘1,000 times’ harder amid claims regime is plotting to assassinate US ambassador

Breaking

  • Jack Williams
Sep 15 2020, 0:14 ETPRESIDENT Donald Trump has issued a stark warning to Iran, stating that an attack on the United States would be met with force "1,000 times greater in magnitude."
Trump made the claim in a tweet posted Monday evening, citing recent reports that Iran may be planning a retaliation to the killing of Qasem Soleimani by the U.S. back in January.

the-sun.com/news/1473822/trump-threatens-strike-iran-1000-times-harder/



Related


Trump reportedly told associates he killed Qassem Soleimani because he was under pressure

Trump: U.S. is in Middle East ‘to protect Israel’ not for oil

Trump has deployed 14,000 additional troops to the Middle East since May

Israeli warplanes use US Tanf Zone to bomb Syria again
Sep 10, 2020

US Seizes 4 Iranian Fuel Tankers En Route To Venezuela, Diverts To Houston
08-14-2020
Iran sanctions ‘acts of war’: Ron Paul

Iraq's Parliament votes to expel U.S. military

Trump threatens Iraq with crippling sanctions if US troops are expelled
 
Last edited:
It probably would have been wise for Trump to apologize for killing Soleimani and fly a couple hundred billion dollars in cash over there for reparations.
 
It probably would have been wise for Trump to apologize for killing Soleimani and fly a couple hundred billion dollars in cash over there for reparations.

Nothing says peace keeper like assassinating a General fighting ISIS, imposing sanctions and withholding seized money(something you will support). The money given to the Iranians by Obama is not reparations, its the money seized after the Iranian revolution plus interest. The US did not give them any handouts, get that through your thick skulls
 
Nothing says peace keeper like assassinating a General fighting ISIS, imposing sanctions and withholding seized money(something you will support). The money given to the Iranians by Obama is not reparations, its the money seized after the Iranian revolution plus interest. The US did not give them any handouts, get that through your thick skulls

Exactly- thanks for knowing that- many people still complain about the money "given" to Iran, when it was money the US had taken from them.
 
Nothing says peace keeper like assassinating a General fighting ISIS, imposing sanctions and withholding seized money(something you will support). The money given to the Iranians by Obama is not reparations, its the money seized after the Iranian revolution plus interest. The US did not give them any handouts, get that through your thick skulls
Golly Gee you could tone it down just one click or two. I have only just arrived here and the first I have ever heard about payback plus interest is from you just now. Do you have sources for that and any type of accounting? How did they arrive at that number? Thanks.
 
Exactly- thanks for knowing that- many people still complain about the money "given" to Iran, when it was money the US had taken from them.
Would it not have been wise of Obama to make that known to the public? Or did he and was I not listening?
 
You weren't listening- it was a well-known fact that the US seized Iran's money.
When was I not listening? In real time when he sent the money or was it disclosed some period of time after the money had been sent or even after his presidency?
 
Nothing will happen.

President Donnell will bomb Iran the day after the election, regardless of who wins. The Republican & Democrat neocon faithful will cheer.

Kavinaugh & the wise latinas will declare the war president, the winner.

 
Last edited:
When was I not listening? In real time when he sent the money or was it disclosed some period of time after the money had been sent or even after his presidency?

Here's what Obama said in his speech about the Nuclear Deal with Iran:
So nuclear deal, implemented. American families, reunited. The third piece of this work that we got done this weekend involved the United States and Iran resolving a financial dispute that dated back more than three decades. Since 1981, after our nations severed diplomatic relations, we've worked through a international tribunal to resolve various claims between our countries. The United States and Iran are now settling a long-standing Iranian government claim against the United States government. Iran will be returned its own funds, including appropriate interest but much less than the amount Iran sought. For the United States, this settlement could save us billions of dollars that could have been pursued by Iran, so there was no benefit to the United States in dragging this out. With your nuclear deal done, prisoners released, the time was right to resolve this dispute as well.

Full speech here:
https://www.weku.fm/post/president-obama-gives-statement-about-us-iran-deals-weekend

And, here's a pretty good synopsis of the action:

Alex Denethorn
, British, but heavily interested in US Politics
Answered May 27, 2018 · Upvoted by
Colin Riegels
, BCL Law, University of Oxford (1997) · Author has 4.2K answers and 18.8M answer views


It’s fairly simple, really:

• The money in question actually belonged to Iran in the first place, and existed as assets frozen by the United States as part of their sanctions against Iran.
• This includes money taken following the Iranian Revolution of 1979, as well as a far more significant amount that was frozen as a result of the sanctions on oil sales: although the oil had been sold, the money from those sales could not be transferred back to Iran due to US sanctions.
• In order to encourage Iran to participate in the JCPOA deal, Obama agreed that the US would release some Iranian assets, as well as allow US companies to engage in trade with Iran: a significant financial gain to a country in severe economic crisis. It was the ‘carrot’ that encouraged Iran to come to the table and stay there: to honour the agreement between themselves, the US, the UK, Germany, China and Russia.
• It’s worth bearing in mind that such funds are usually frozen via Executive Order: Jimmy Carter froze Iranian assets in 1979 via Executive Order 12170. As such, an executive (i.e. the President of the United States) can repeal, reverse or ignore such orders, as Obama did in releasing Iranian assets.
• Up until Trump arrived on the scene, Iran had been acting in good faith with regards to the JCPOA deal, and the idea of freezing further assets was not raised as a consideration.

Anyway, the money did not belong to the United States in the first place: it had always belonged to the Iranians, but was being held by the US and not released to Iran, primarily so it might be used as diplomatic leverage - precisely how Obama did use it.
 
Last edited:
Nothing says peace keeper like assassinating a General fighting ISIS, imposing sanctions and withholding seized money(something you will support). The money given to the Iranians by Obama is not reparations, its the money seized after the Iranian revolution plus interest. The US did not give them any handouts, get that through your thick skulls
The general was arranging attacks on our embassy and troops in a country that wasn't his.
 
The general was arranging attacks on our embassy and troops in a country that wasn't his.

To Progressives and Libertarians everyone ever killed by the U.S. government is a peace loving patchoullie wearing pacifist participating in a sit-in. Including anyone ever killed in the history of the country by law-enforcement.
 
To Progressives and Libertarians everyone ever killed by the U.S. government is a peace loving patchoullie wearing pacifist participating in a sit-in. Including anyone ever killed in the history of the country by law-enforcement.
And anyone who kills Americans is a heroic freedom fighter.
 
Elective war at any given time is a bad idea but would be a very bad idea before 2020 elections and chances of any major war before election date remain close to zero.
Even after election, chances of Iran military escalation are not high and in future GOP-Adelson leadership almost certainly will also be more prudent in evaluating reports that could become war catalysts.

BBC Producer's Syria Bombshell: Douma "Gas Attack" Footage "Was Staged"

pmcomposite-twin-up-insetivanka.jpg

Donald Trump carried out Syria missile strike ‘after being convinced by daughter Ivanka’
 
WTF IS THE OBSESSION WITH A NATION 8,000 MILES AWAY

that the US attacked in 1953



Meanwhile, the US has been infested with Liars, Cheats and Thieves- as the Secretary of State admits



What kind of nation allows a self-admitted LIAR, CHEAT and THIEF to occupy a prominent role in their government? THE USA

USA USA USA USA USA USA

 
Back
Top