St. Louis To Lower Minimum Wage.

Lost?
How does the minimum wage not do additional damage?
Of course our whole fiat system is bad, but are seriously trying to claim that more government intervention does not do more damage?
Are you seriously trying to claim that crony capitalism is more fiscally responsible then socialism when our money is fake?
 
Are you seriously trying to claim that crony capitalism is more fiscally responsible then socialism when our money is fake?
More Government = WORSE
Less Government = BETTER

And it is the Crony Capitalists that want the minimum wage, it prevents small business competition from getting off the ground.
And it is the Crony Capitalists who always secretly end up in charge of Socialism and use it to manage their HUMAN RESOURCES.
 
More Government = WORSE
Less Government = BETTER

And it is the Crony Capitalists that want the minimum wage, it prevents small business competition from getting off the ground.
And it is the Crony Capitalists who always secretly end up in charge of Socialism and use it to manage their HUMAN RESOURCES.
The government can't create wealth, that's the lie you are trying to push. The government can only divide up what they steal from us. The cost of labor cannot be controlled by government. When the government creates a prohibition on things like cheap labor it just creates a black market for cheap labor, and gives the government the monopoly on the black market.

You are not doing anything to get rid of the black market for cheap labor by getting rid of the minimum wage, you are just getting rid of some of the demand, and is a poor substitute for market correction when labor costs are too high which has more unintended consequences that the liberals will blame on liberty instead of the government created black market for cheap labor.
 
The government can't create wealth, that's the lie you are trying to push. The government can only divide up what they steal from us. The cost of labor cannot be controlled by government. When the government creates a prohibition on things like cheap labor it just creates a black market for cheap labor, and gives the government the monopoly on the black market.

You are not doing anything to get rid of the black market for cheap labor by getting rid of the minimum wage, you are just getting rid of some of the demand, and is a poor substitute for market correction when labor costs are too high which has more unintended consequences that the liberals will blame on liberty instead of the government created black market for cheap labor.

You must be drunk.
I never said that the government could create wealth.
Black markets are always smaller and less lively than legalized markets, if outlawing something had no effect they would not do it.
You are the one who does not want the market to determine the price of labor.
 
You must be drunk.
I never said that the government could create wealth.
Black markets are always smaller and less lively than legalized markets, if outlawing something had no effect they would not do it.
You are the one who does not want the market to determine the price of labor.
What do you mean, the market doesn't determine wage. Why don't you be honest and explain to me what determines the price you trade your time for? Why does no one argue about minimum wages when the economy is doing great and no one is willing to work for it?
 
What do you mean, the market doesn't determine wage.

Yes it does, the same way that it determines the price of everything unless Government or Criminal force get involved.

Why don't you be honest and explain to me what determines the price you trade your time for?

What I am willing to work for vs. what someone else is willing/able to offer.

Why does no one argue about minimum wages when the economy is doing great and no one is willing to work for it?

The same reason people don't argue about anything that is not actively affecting their lives, when no one is willing to work for minimum wage employers are forced by the market to offer more, so eliminating the minimum wage and letting the market rule is not very important to them because economics has functionally already done so.
 
If government created monopolies weren't solvent they would fail right? RIGHT!?!?!

They are solvent, every time they print money they steal a portion of every other dollar in existence, a license to steal can do wonders for your bottom line.
Eventually they become insolvent and fail anyway, like Wiemar Germany.
 
The same reason people don't argue about anything that is not actively affecting their lives
People argue about whether superman could beat up batman. The reason why we can't have real wages is because of our monetary policy. The government mal invetment doesn't get liquidated in our current economy so you can't really argue that wage laws or regulation has anything to do with the cost of doing business. You can't have entire industries subsidizing their losses on farmers, it just can't happen without printing money, and if you are going to print money then there is no real wage because the market is distorted. Taxes absolutely have a huge affect though, and the real tax, which is the inflation tax or government spending and printing the money, everything else is mountains to molehills.
 
Last edited:
People argue about whether superman could beat up batman. The reason why we can't have real wages is because of our monetary policy. The government mal invetment doesn't get liquidated in our current economy so you can't really argue that wage laws or regulation has anything to do with the cost of doing business. You can't have entire industries subsidizing their losses on farmers, it just can't happen without printing money, and if you are going to print money then there is no real wage because the market is distorted. Taxes absolutely have a huge affect though, and the real tax, which is the inflation tax or printing of money, everything else is mountains to molehills.

And more government intervention will only make things worse.


Outlawing paying someone less than X directly affects the cost of doing business especially for small businesses, Nobody can claim otherwise without being a liar or insane.
 
And more government intervention will only make things worse.
more government intervention then printing money, controlling interest rates, monetizing debt, and sky high taxes? Why not put lipstick on a pig?
 
Yes a minimum wage is more, it is not in your list therefore it is more, Full Communism is even more yet.



It wastes your time and annoys the pig.
Its a figure of speech- you can't make the pig prettier by putting lipstick on it. Arguing about whether or not we should abolish the minimum wage because we need more liberty is exactly that. As long as we continue to monetize the debt the government will still be able to maintain the military industrial complex and the medical industrial complex and everything else that we monetize through debt that determines the value of the dollar and the cost of living which determines the cost of wage and the cost of doing business.
 
Its a figure of speech- you can't make the pig prettier by putting lipstick on it. Arguing about whether or not we should abolish the minimum wage because we need more liberty is exactly that. As long as we continue to monetize the debt the government will still be able to maintain the military industrial complex and the medical industrial complex and everything else that we monetize through debt that determines the value of the dollar and the cost of living which determines the cost of wage and the cost of doing business.

No facet of Tyranny is trivial, and I will call for the end of each and every one, besides that is not how this started, Missouri rolled back St.Louis's minimum wage and Keith and Stuff mentioned that NH had eliminated their minimum wage, then YOU chimed in to DEFEND the minimum wage as a "good" thing like a good little Liberal.
 
No facet of Tyranny is trivial, and I will call for the end of each and every one, besides that is not how this started, Missouri rolled back St.Louis's minimum wage and Keith and Stuff mentioned that NH had eliminated their minimum wage, then YOU chimed in to DEFEND the minimum wage as a "good" thing like a good little Liberal.
There you go calling me a Liberal because I don't want to pay the banks to give people loans for houses they can't afford. It's a great way to win an argument against a libertarian who doesn't want to pay other people to go through college and then not even get a job afterwards when I can't afford to go to college myself. FUCK me for not wanting to pay for other people to go to the doctors when I can't afford to get a check up because the doctor is going to fuck me with 6 return visits at 30 dollars a pop and I don't want to really pay 180 dollars to find out something is wrong with me and I can't afford to fix it.
 
There you go calling me a Liberal because I don't want to pay the banks to give people loans for houses they can't afford. It's a great way to win an argument against a libertarian who doesn't want to pay other people to go through college and then not even get a job afterwards when I can't afford to go to college myself. $#@! me for not wanting to pay for other people to go to the doctors when I can't afford to get a check up because the doctor is going to $#@! me with 6 return visits at 30 dollars a pop and I don't want to really pay 180 dollars to find out something is wrong with me and I can't afford to fix it.

If your drunken outburst has any relation to what I have said then you must be complaining about those on welfare being able to take jobs at a lower wage.
If that is the case then the correct answer is to end welfare.
I called you a liberal because you want more government as a solution to a problem. That is not libertarian or conservative or minarchist.
 
If your drunken outburst has any relation to what I have said then you must be complaining about those on welfare being able to take jobs at a lower wage.
If that is the case then the correct answer is to end welfare.
I called you a liberal because you want more government as a solution to a problem. That is not libertarian or conservative or minarchist.
I just pointed out that the solution of removing the minimum wage is a false choice establishment narrative. Calling me a partisan in an age where partisan politics is dead is a laugh anyways. The effect minimum wage has on the actual wage of any industry is like a spec of sand in the ocean. Coal miners shouldn't be paying for other people to go to college
 
I just pointed out that the solution of removing the minimum wage is a false choice establishment narrative. Calling me a partisan in an age where partisan politics is dead is a laugh anyways. The effect minimum wage has on the actual wage of any industry is like a spec of sand in the ocean. Coal miners shouldn't be paying for other people to go to college

You are deranged.
Removing the minimum wage does not make Coal miners pay for other people to go to college.
You want to make small businesses pay so that low skill workers can go to college.
You want government to "Solve" a problem that you perceive, that is NOT libertarian, it is Statist.
 
You are deranged.
Removing the minimum wage does not make Coal miners pay for other people to go to college.
You want to make small businesses pay so that low skill workers can go to college.
You want government to "Solve" a problem that you perceive, that is NOT libertarian, it is Statist.
No I was pointing out that these types of arguments make it to where we can't see the forest from the tree through all the nonsensical bickering like trying to say that the government can control wages. You even said it yourself the government can't control what you choose to work for. The government can absolutely run up a bunch of debt and take away your house and sell it back to you by proxy of their bankster friends. They can run up a bunch of debt and make college or healthcare so expensive ruining the quality and making costs skyrocket so people cant afford it. That's the real reason why people are debating minimum wages right now, its a distraction from the real problem. The forest is on fire and you are staring and a dead stump that people have been circumventing through paying people under the table or paying people salary and having them work 80+ hr weeks like in the IT industry.
 
Back
Top