SPLC releases new list of patriot extremist groups by state

It gets even worse, first time I've ever hear of them but SPLCentre seem really vile with a huge statist agenda. They're not scared of dirty gutter tacticts in order to persue that agenda either:

Sheriff of Their Own
Richard Mack, 57

It seems hardly a day goes by without another Mack attack on the evils of the federal government. This one-time sheriff of a rural county in Arizona and present-day icon of the Patriot movement has parlayed his antigovernment ardor into a full-time job doing speaking gigs at county fairgrounds, high school auditoriums and hotel banquet rooms. He even has a sponsor.

Richard Mack is introduced — often to standing ovations — as "Sheriff Mack." His website calls him that too, even though he hasn't been the top cop of Graham County since 1996, when its population was around 30,000.

Mack's mantra is this: The federal government is too big, too corrupt and too oppressive. "The greatest threat we face today is not terrorists; it is our federal government," he warns on his website. Some agencies, including the "Gestapo" Internal Revenue Service, should be eliminated, he says.

Mack has also acted as a key transmitter of such Patriot ideas to Tea Party groups, to whom he now regularly speaks.

He regularly rips undocumented workers and the "socialist" and "Marxist" policies of the Obama Administration. He assures his nearly all-white audiences that neither he nor the Patriot movement is racist (although he did once co-author a book with white separatist Randy Weaver). Had it been his call, Mack would not have made Rosa Parks get off that bus back in 1955, he says. She was merely disobeying a bad law, and cops waste time "enforcing stupid laws all the time."

Mack became a hero of gun-rights advocates after he won a U.S. Supreme Court decision with a few other sheriffs that weakened the Brady gun control bill in the 1990s. Now, he maintains that county sheriffs are the highest legitimate law enforcement authorities — an idea also pushed by the violently anti-Semitic Posse Comitatus in the 1980s — and he relentlessly hawks his latest self-published book, which makes that argument. Its 50 simplistic pages represent "decades of research." Even the president of the United States, Mack tells cheering audiences, "cannot tell your sheriff what to do."
 
Last edited:
SPLC releases

fart.jpg

what part of this release was inaccurate? I'm not saying I like SPLC or I buy everything they say, I want to know where they mistaken or lied in this one. What word was misused or misleading to a reader?
 
what part of this release was inaccurate? I'm not saying I like SPLC or I buy everything they say, I want to know where they mistaken or lied in this one. What word was misused or misleading to a reader?

How is "Constitutionalists" equated as anti Government? It is very Pro-Government. Or more accurately Pro-Lawful Government.

As are many of the groups mentioned.

The biggest problem is that these stupid Anti-American traitors are intricately hooked up with governmental and law enforcement establishment. They are the research arm of the Fusion Centers and regularly train police..
Which explains a lot.
 
“common-law” courts, publishers, ministries and citizens’ groups. Patriot groups define themselves as opposed to the “New World Order,” engage in groundless conspiracy theorizing, or advocate or adhere to extreme antigovernment doctrines. That's why CFL was not listed and JBS, Oath Keepers and Alex Jones would be.

Campaign for Liberty is extremely anti-government. As it should be. :)
 
You SHOULD be proud, they didn't say there's ANYTHING WRONG with these groups. Did they? What are people here so mad about?

They are listing their "intel" reports on groups they oppose. They are listing these groups under 'patriot' (inverted commas is theirs). Their literature constantly labels this 'patriot' movement as racist, violent and extreme.

Look at the way they try to paint Richard "Sheriff" Mack as a white-supremacist.
 
How is "Constitutionalists" equated as anti Government? It is very Pro-Government. Or more accurately Pro-Lawful Government.

It's not, they were including both Constitutionalists, and anti-government. It's called being inclusive and not generalizing.

As are many of the groups mentioned.

The biggest problem is that these stupid Anti-American traitors are intricately hooked up with governmental and law enforcement establishment. They are the research arm of the Fusion Centers and regularly train police..
Which explains a lot.

What they do is nothing you can't do, they don't have any insider information, they simply subscribe to newsletters and e-mail lists, or have their people join groups, nothing illegal and nothing the groups wouldn't want done to promote them anyway. None of these groups are secret societies and if any of them engaged in illegal activity, are you saying you wouldn't want law enforcement to know about it? If so, how is that not anti-government?

Oath Keepers is a good example of a group that seeks to work with government locally, but it doesn't change the fact they promote conspiracy theories about globalism and FEMA camps, which makes them listed on this page.
 
You SHOULD be proud, they didn't say there's ANYTHING WRONG with these groups. Did they? What are people here so mad about?

How about the use of the word extremist? That would tend to paint them as bad wouldn't it?
 
They are listing their "intel" reports on groups they oppose. They are listing these groups under 'patriot' (inverted commas is theirs). Their literature constantly labels this 'patriot' movement as racist, violent and extreme.

Look at the way they try to paint Richard "Sheriff" Mack as a white-supremacist.

Did you notice they specifically said this time the groups are neither racist nor violent? Do they actually have to say "we approve these groups as safe and admirable" for you to green light?
 
How about the use of the word extremist? That would tend to paint them as bad wouldn't it?

Except the context of the word used was like this
define themselves as opposed to the “New World Order,” engage in groundless conspiracy theorizing, or advocate or adhere to extreme antigovernment doctrines

What group listed here is NOT accurately described as such? And no, antigovernment is not bad if you already believe government is bad. Extreme simply means outside of mainstream, or sometimes, outside of reality.
 
Campaign for Liberty is extremely anti-government. As it should be. :)

not according to this guy

How about the use of the word extremist? That would tend to paint them as bad wouldn't it?

Why don't you call up CFL and ask them to ask SPLC to place them on the list? I just don't see how this list is demonizing or accusing anybody of anything wrong.

How is "Constitutionalists" equated as anti Government? It is very Pro-Government. Or more accurately Pro-Lawful Government.

you guys can argue amongst yourselves.
 
Wow, they included such obviously racist and extreme hate groups as We Are Change, Granny Warriors, and the Tenth Amendment Center! /sarc

Stay classy, SPLC.

that's the point, they DID NOT SAY they were racist or hate groups, they've learned to be clear and honest this time, but just because SPLC isn't approving their support, people are never happy whatever they say.
 
Where's the "American Constitutional Law Center" list of these Communist/Fascist/Marxist/Socialist centers like the SPLC and their threats on America?

FIRE with FIRE baby... LIBERTY and Freedom WIN

here
N.O.W. - National Organization of Women
NAACP - National Association for the Advancement of Colored People
JDL - Jewish Defense League
ACLU - American Civil Liberties Union
ADL -- Anti-Defamation League
Planned Parenthood
Jewish League
Jewish World Federation
B'nai B'rith
Jewish Bund
Simon Wiesenthal Center
American Israeli Political Action Committee
World Zionist Organization
Nat'l Council of Christians & Jews
 
I don't train Government enforcers nor do I have a multi-million dollar War chest to influnce legislation.
They do Both.

There are a part of FEMA.

They have lots of money and do a lot, but the publication of such a list did not take that. Anybody with 2 hours a day can do it. You can dislike them for what they do, but what they published here is not news to anybody who actually cares about these groups one way or the other.
 
They have lots of money and do a lot, but the publication of such a list did not take that. Anybody with 2 hours a day can do it. You can dislike them for what they do, but what they published here is not news to anybody who actually cares about these groups one way or the other.

What is your fucking point.
It is not the "list" that is the problem.
It is the fact that this List is taken seriously by people in Power.
You know,, the ones with Tanks and Guns that shoot people for little or NO reason.

It is not just a random list. It is a list produced by a de-facto government agency (despite claims to the contrary) (NGO)
They are presently in FULL Partnership with Law Enforcement. (Fusion Centers)
 
"onlyrp" defending the SPLC again, as if he works for them. I am shocked.
 
Back
Top