Danke
Top Rated Influencer
- Joined
- Nov 6, 2007
- Messages
- 44,263
U
I agree.
I think the reserves are great. They have a lot of experience and maintain minimal proficiency but can quickly gen up if they need to.
When I interpret standing army I see it as having an active duty military capable of defending our nation.
We are not in disagreement as far as a large standing army.
And I am a Marine. Calling me Army is an insult.
Also, only .4% of the population is Active Duty:
http://fivethirtyeight.com/datalab/what-percentage-of-americans-have-served-in-the-military/
So really it is HOW our military is used, and WHY so much money is wasted.
Look, I swear I'm not a neocon with a bloodlust to invade every country that has oil in it.
I simply recognize that warfighting is serious business (from experience) that takes time to learn the most basic training.
Then it takes significant practice to gain even the most minimum proficiency.
Perhaps if we didn't spend our money on F-35's, abortions of Super carriers like the Gerold Ford (it's cost a ton of money and is also a POS like the F35), and instead spent money on a defensive posture, modern nuclear missle for the good old MAD policy and generally simply budgeted intelligently, strigently and with forward thinking we could have a great modern military that is also cost effective.
I agree.
I think the reserves are great. They have a lot of experience and maintain minimal proficiency but can quickly gen up if they need to.