Someone please explain how Ron Paul beat Peden with 70%

[Myerz]

I think it's primarily the war issue for these voters. Most love his congressional votes on domestic issues and put up with his anti-war sentiments. They like him on a lot of his policy positions otherwise but don't want him to be commander in chief.

Unlike the military who do want him as Commander in Chief!

 

[Smiley Gladhands]

I wasn't aware of this but are you saying that if there is no Democrat running for that Congressional seat, a Democrat living in that district has NO VOICE whatsoever? They can't vote at all for who their representative will be? Just looking for clarification.

Any Texan could choose to vote in either the Democratic or Republican primary, but not both during the same election. So if a Democrat has an opinion between Hillary and Obama (and most Democrats do), then they would probably vote in that race instead of voting in the Republican primary, just to spite a neocon who's challenging an anti-war Republican congressman. That's just my opinion of a Democrat's thought process, but that might be giving the average democrat too much credit for rational thinking.

 

[heartless]

rye-gold

 

[ButchHowdy]

From: http://www.rense.com/general81/txs.htm

From Linda -

(I am forwarding to all CD captains, and as many Ohio groups as possible):

Very Important on this thread: so keep the thread moving through the groups.

"I had a Gentleman call me when I got Home from the Kent Meeting last night from New York.

He happens to be publishing a book with photos of all of the 2004 Election Fraud Evidence, that was supposed to be published by a company in Kent State? He literally has the photographs of burned and otherwise mutilated, destroyed ballots. He is very familiar with how to follow the fraud, due to his research in the book.

I would call him an investigative Journalist, in Election Fraud.

I don't know him from Adam.

He called me last night, from New York, upset about huge numbers of precincts in Texas, where there were thousands of registered voters, and ZERO votes at all, with 100 of the Precincts reporting in.

He repeated so I understood.

He is saying there are precincts with over 2000 registered voters, and the official count is saying NO one voted at all in that precinct after the precinct has reported in officially!

He said he has been studying elections now, for years. He has NEVER seen anything like this.

He said the number of zero precincts, are especially High in the Panhandle of Texas. He also mentioned what Ron here is saying in this post.

Ron Paul got more votes in his precinct for Congressman, than he did for president in the same precinct...by huge amounts.

This investigative Journalist is just about to publish the research on the fraud, and now, the company that was going to print with his book, has suddenly pulled out, and refusing to publish.

He was supposed to be doing a book signing at Kent on the anniversary of the shootings, that happens annually there... I guess.

He now has to self-publish, which, given the situation, and the fact that he is the only one with his "manual", puts him in a great deal of danger.
Maybe I am a little paranoid for him, because of my past experience with revolution researchers and publishers who have suddenly gone missing, or suddenly 'commit suicide,' over the past ten years. But while we were on the phone, we were getting echoes, then, three or four voice cut-outs for ten, then 20 then 30 seconds. Finally, we were disconnected, and could not get reconnected.

I did ask him to write to me so I could foreword the Texas research he did to all, and let you hear about the Ron Paul Information, since I know all of you would care a lot. I explained to him how to get a hold of the Ron Paul Texas Meetups, so they could investigate, and move on the situation, if they chose. I am hoping for an email from him this morning. I will be trying to call him back all day today.

So, please to the degree you can, keep an eye on this thread. If I get him on the phone, I will let you know. He needs some help getting his information out, and wants to investigate the Ron Paul campaign and election fraud, on a larger scale. Will follow up.... and if he does send an email, I will be sure to post it to you all

Linda

 

[bulloncoins]

Can anyone tell us how many people showed up in the precincts in his district to their precinct conventions? This will show how much support he had in those precincts for his Presidental run. If there is a big difference between people showing up for him at the conventions vs. votes counted in that precinct you could help prove the vote was tampered with.

They had to sign in. There are records.

 

[nodope0695]

I'd hazzard a guess and say that the presidential race was RIGGED and the congressional race was not.

 

[amonasro]

Maybe some voters didn't know who Ron was and took a 50/50 guess on that portion of the ballot, resulting in a lot of votes for him. Still doesn't really explain the massive difference though...

 

[blakjak]

Its actually very simple. Voters didn't want to "waste their vote" on "someone that could not win" for president.

 

[leglock]

incumbent

+

Its actually very simple. Voters didn't want to "waste their vote" on "someone that could not win" for president.

 

[syborius]

Its actually very simple. Voters didn't want to "waste their vote" on "someone that could not win" for president.

So you mean to tell me all those Mccaniac people voted for Mccain in the 14th district, yet walked out on Peden, decided not to vote so Ron Paul could win because they loved Ron Paul? If Mccain won in a legitimate landslide, that would carry over to the congressional district and the Peden platform would prevail as well.

 

[[email protected]]

Read the last line of this article written by Pat Buchanan.
I'm not sure what side he is playing for but he does seem to be an insider.
This Should at least wake up a few more kool-aid drinkers.

http://buchanan.org/blog/?p=957

Buchanan is definitely an insider. If not, he wouldn't be on TV so much.

 

[syborius]

thank you pat.

 

[SteveMartin]

G. Edward Griffin has offered to help get that fellow's book published!

 

[Primbs]

I think most people like Ron Paul as their congressman and like the fact that he raises questions. But they may not see him as presidential material.

So they support him for one position, but not the other.

 

[Expatriate]

I think most people like Ron Paul as their congressman and like the fact that he raises questions. But they may not see him as presidential material.

So they support him for one position, but not the other.

Utter bologna, in my opinion.

So you think anyone who knows enough about Ron Paul to understand the questions he raises would prefer Obillary or McCain for president?

Your statement makes no sense to me.

 

[Primbs]

Utter bologna, in my opinion.

So you think anyone who knows enough about Ron Paul to understand the questions he raises would prefer Obillary or McCain for president?

Your statement makes no sense to me.

I don't think most people know enough about Ron Paul. That is problem number one.

Or most people are pragmatic and just want to vote for the winner McCain.