I think not coming clean on this was a mistake. I don't think it's that difficult to have a pretty good idea of who wrote these, and I do not believe the campaign when they say they don't know (which is troubling). Gee, who are the two or three people who have worked with Dr. Paul over the past 30 or so years. So what if they are still involved. I haven't read all of this stuff very closely, but from what I've heard there isn't anything more horrific in these newsletters than what was said by other candidates in the debate last night.