OptionsTrader
Member
- Joined
- Sep 17, 2007
- Messages
- 5,987
People store 1000.00 in your vault.
You loan 800.00 becuase you can only loan what you have ( anti -fractional ) and then they default... the other people want their 1000.00 back... your sunk.
Ideally, I should be able to delegate the loaning responsibility to banks who are more knowledgeable and judicial in assessing a loan's risk than I would be or could be interested in.
Does this kind of thing means I no longer delegate that responsibility? Not saying that it's bad thing, only wanted to know if I didn't have the appetite, could I entrust someone else to do the assessment?
But how do you know that they're really investing the money where they say they are?
me3 is eternally posturing for a moderator position, don't pay too much heed to it. The point of your post appears to be to discuss private lending. I think it's a very good idea. An idea I've had is to create a FULL RESERVE bank. Not the fractional reserve thieving bullshit. I just don't know what, if any, laws are in place that I'd have to worry about. I wouldn't be surprised if the FDIC has some method of shutting such a bank down.
Already things like this called thrift banks. And they are even legit.
You are never going to compete with the Fed unless you can counterfeit money from thin air as well as they can, and you don't get caught.
Yeah, but they can't stop us from starting "survivalist" meet up groups in our communities that use the bartering system and gold and silver for trading purposes amongst ourselves...if we all did it through our Ron Paul meet ups as well as getting the ham radio clubs, gun clubs and associations, minutemen, etc. involved in each of our communities, it could be big.