Ridiculous
Member
- Joined
- Aug 16, 2007
- Messages
- 1,148
Remember guys, the truth needs a new version every week.
I can't wait until Loose Change: Final Cut Part IV, Truther's revenge.
Remember guys, the truth needs a new version every week.
A bird will still be a bird and a cat will still be a cat..
Macro-evolution is the study that a animal can evolve into a different genus, family, order, etc. Micro-evolution is the study of minor changes within the same species. Evidence for micro-evolution is not evidence for macro-evolution.
Scary.
Like String Theory?
Creationism is not an alternative for micro-evolution. It is a alternative for the theory that that lifeless matter be turned into living matter.
I've read both sides of the argument. I was taught evolution through all of my schooling like brainwashing. I also know that religion does not necessarily exclude it. I came to my own conclusion that evidence strongly opposes macro-evolution. How much of the other side have you read?
http://www.scienceagainstevolution.org/newsletters.htm
The problem with evolutionists such as Dawkins is that they backed themselves into a corner. If macro-evolution cannot happen, that means something else is the cause. What is it? They can't even consider the alternative brought up by those proposing Intelligent Design because their faith is that there is no higher power of any sort so it can't possibly be designed.
I can't wait until Loose Change: Final Cut Part IV, Truther's revenge.
I can't wait until Loose Change: Final Cut Part IV, Truther's revenge.
It's funny, watch the different versions. Almost everything is dropped between versions, and now the latest video is mostly just posing questions and showing pictures of supporters.
The funny part was where they got into Project Northwoods. Then they got school not even an hour after it because they didn't know that the man that proposed this UNCLASSIFIED document was fired the second he proposed it.
It really would be funny if it weren't for the fact that these guys want to be taken seriously.
Here's a typical argument with a truther:
truther:9/11!
intelligent person: nope
truther: well what about this thing over here???!!!
intelligent person: nope
truther: building 7
intelligent person: not enough evidence to have an opinion
truther: ha, told you so! (makes more tinfoil hats)
No point in arguing with them. It will only suck energy from you that can be better used else where.
hawkeye is already on my ignore list for a reason. Next will be ridiculous. The list is growing!
oh, BTW
calling yourself "Intelligent" while at the same time denying that something could ever happen is moronic. We don't take you seriously.
It's actually quite amusing at times watching dimwits stick up for Dubya.
I wasn't talking about me, you assumed I was.
See, that's what you get from truthers and creationists/id people, they come with an assertion and only see evidence that might prove their claim.
You absolutely were talking about yourself. The two speakers in your conversation were "Truther" (meaning anyone who doesn't buy the official theory) and "Intellengent Person" (meaning everyone who does)
Since you accept the official story of events, you would (according to you) fit under the "Intelligent Person" catagory. Therefore, you consider yourself an intelligent person. That isn't hard...
I don't take you seriously because you missed these very simple logical steps.
I never said I accepted the "official story"
That's another truther tactic, once you shut them down they go "how can you believe the offical story?"
You haven't even come close to shutting me down son. So then what do you believe??
The truth, not the speculation you put out there and say is the truth