So are we done ignoring the Evangelicals?

:D They are just being a royal pain, it's socially-engineered OVER-sensitivity-training by their teachers and leaders and pastors heaped onto the flock. The people you talked to are making too much of the word "religious" or "religion." They should be more gracious and simply say, "Yes, of course, I know what you mean, I am a Christian," or a Muslim, or whatever, instead of making a major production out of it.

Because in the "old days," "religion" simply meant you believed in God, Jesus, the Bible, Christianity, or whatever. It's the "trend" of the last 30 years or so to start bashing the word "religion" as if the word itself was demonized, thanks to the likes of Paul Crouch, Sr. (TBN) who is famous for saying, "I hate religion!" and he taught his 2 sons to act the same way. It's petty and shallow, since any reasonable person knows what you would mean if you used that word, ie, that you are not being disrespectful or making distinctions, etc.

It's all ridiculous, imo, the attitude that take over it.

-----------

With all that said, lol, I no longer am part of a "heirarchal religion" (been through 2 of those already, finally learning, lol, ie, from the top down, human leaders down to the peons, with rules and regs that supposedly must be followed in order to "secure one's salvation") but simply am a Christian, period, with Jesus as my direct leader. ;) But if you asked me about "religion," I would know what you meant, of course. No biggie.

OK, off my rant now.:cool:

In-fighting is one of the reasons I started my own Christian Denomination - it's quite non-productive and ridiculous -

it divides when Christians should be One
 
In-fighting is one of the reasons I started my own Christian Denomination - it's quite non-productive and ridiculous -

it divides when Christians should be One
So, let me get this straight: you were sick of divisiveness, so you declined to work within the bounds of your (or some other) denomination and started your own? Makes sense to me!:confused:
 
My 2c worth on this:

1) Dr Paul is not just a Christian - he describes himself as an evangelical Christian.

2) Paul and Huckabee are the really the only two Republicans who have good evangelical Christian credentials.

a. Thomson admits he doesn't go to church much.
b. Romney is a member of a non-evangelical denomination.
c. McCain is a self-confessed adulterer and a man who uses language which most evangelicals would see as not acceptable.
d. Giuliani makes no claims at all to be an evangelical Christian.

3. Ron Paul is actually not doing too badly at getting the evangelical Christian vote. Polling in Iowa showed that while Giuliani, Thomson, McCain, and Romney did significantly better among non-evangelicals than evangelicals, Ron Paul did about equally well among both groups.

http://edition.cnn.com/ELECTION/2008/primaries/results/epolls/#val=IAREP
 
Back
Top