Silver is on sale!

Yeah they are doing it in the background bit by bit rather then publicly announcing godzilla sized bond purcahses.

Also from your link:

“There’s increasing appetite for dip-buying,” Nishi said. “Stocks probably won’t drop much lower.”

I view this as accurate. Currency depreciation is becoming more and more known. BTFD or watch your cash burn longterm.



The "Federal Reserve" said that they wouldnt be adding liquidity or expanding the money supply, which is good for the dollar. In reality they probably are but publicly.

http://www.businessweek.com/news/20...ne-2nd-day-as-fed-offers-no-new-stimulus.html
 
There's always more paper everything than physical. That's how the commodities world works...agriculture, metals, energy, that's the entire point of the paper market. It's there to be a hedge device for producers and holders of commodities. If you had to wait until you refined every ounce of silver or grew every bushel of wheat, there wouldn't be much of a fuckin' futures market, nor a purpose for it.

There is no homogeneous "commodities". Soft and hard commodities are two entirely different animals, with a different set of dynamics and underlying fundamentals.

The futures markets for perishable commodities work very well, I think, but only because seasonal demand and supply cycles of soft commodities keep prices in check. The paper representing them is constantly being created and destroyed in the short term, and does not float forever, as they tend to track and balance finite seasonal production to demand and consumption. That does not mean these markets are not subject to manipulation - they are. However, manipulation is a two-edged sword, as all the competing paper are constantly adjusting relative to perceived, expected, and actual supply, which holds everything, and everyone, in check.

Underlying demand and supply cycles exist with hard commodities as well (as with mining/refining versus industrial consumption), but that is only a part of the fundamentals. Actual nonperishable supplies are not naturally cleared and accounted for annually, the way soft commodities are, and as a result the above ground supply, can be, and is constantly, distorted, as futures give birth to a wide variety of long term derivatives that are more akin to financial assets, the paper of which can indeed be inflated - and routinely are in a way that does not in any way resemble the soft commodities market.

Such hard commodity distortions go away in the case of a natural physical shortage, as when annual consumption exceeds annual below ground supply. This is a "physical shortage" when we consider two distinct supply sources -- annual production versus above ground holdings, or "reserves". The fact that both might be available on the open market is incidental. In the case of industrial consumption, the buyer always takes delivery. Annual production that does not keep pace with industrial consumption is compensated by tapping into above ground "reserves". That particular fundamental is not only finite, but is also not reflected in the ever-expanding paper derivatives, so many of which are tied into options for delivery or "multiple conflicting claims on the same physical".

Eventually, above ground holdings, or open market reserves, diminish to the point where the tightened above ground supply becomes obvious to everyone. Not by anyone's estimation, but by real constraints on availability. At that point all paper becomes volatile, as margin calls tighten along with supply, as everyone makes a grab for the remaining physical. That is when supply and demand cycles become much closer in resemblance to the dynamics of soft commodities. That also means a massive deflation of paper derivatives, and increase in price, as paper finally recouples with the hard commodity it represents.

Now, even if there is a case of "fake shortage", where, for example, someone has deliberately and secretly stored a massive stockpile of silver and held it in reserve for later sale, the fundamental that siphoned down the above ground supply in the first place will not have changed. The market will continue to siphon even that supply as it is made available, until, once again, the fundamentals are closer to that of soft commodities.

Those are the fundamentals, which have nothing to do with whether or not COMEX, JPM or anyone else in back rooms are colluding to manipulate paper and prices.

My thoughts on why the sudden recent drop:

The vast majority bought gold and silver on spec, while others bought as a form of "closing their eyes and holding their breath". Whether they bought it on long term expectations or not, demands for cash in the current economy are rampant - especially at this time of year. A lot of "investors" bought without regard to whether they could hold their breath, and are forced to exhale, forced to liquidate their holdings (paper or physical). They need cash, and they need it now, of all times.

So, buy more on the massive dip, because it really is a temporary windfall, regardless what caused it. Meanwhile, none of the fundamentals, or the end game, have changed - especially for silver.
 
Last edited:
52 week lows = bottom feeder buying opp

These companies have amazing assets, yet are testing 52 weeks lows.

I'm doubling down, cutting my average share cost by 25%.

At these prices they are prime targets for acquisition/buyouts.

In order of descending desirability (get the top 14 ASAP):

USSIF - US SILVER CORPORATION (Idaho producer)

CGR - CLAUDE RESOURCES (Canada gold producer)

OSKFF - Osisko Mining (Quebec gold producer)

BRD - Brigus Gold (Canada producer)

CMCXF - CMC METALS (Yukon AG producer)

WLDVF - Wildcat Silver (Arizona developer)

RVRCF - REVOLUTION RESOURCES (Carolina gold developer)

RTRAF - ROMARCO MINERALS (Carolina gold developer)

ATADF - ATAC RESOURCES (Yukon gold developer)

KMKGF - Kaminak Gold Corp (Yukon explorer)

GMLFF - Global Minerals (Slovakia AG/CU developer)

UXG - US Gold (AU/AG explorer)

SVROF - SILVER PREDATOR (Yukon explorer)

GPRXF - GOLDEN PREDATOR (Yukon explorer)

GGCRF - SILVERMEX RESOURCES (Mexico producer)

CRECF - CRITICAL ELEMENTS (Canada rare earth explorer)

BGAVF - BRAVADA GOLD (Nevada developer)

NQEXF - NQ EXPLORATION (Canada AU/AG/CU)

NFRGF - NORTHERN FREEGOLD (Yukon AU/AG developer)

PNCKF - Pure Nickel Inc (Alaska Ni/PGM explorer)

BNRJF - BENTON RESOURCES (Canada Au/PGM explorer)
 
  • Like
Reactions: gls
only thing i worry about with the miners is nationalization.

this tail risk needs to be factored in. Will concede much higher upside,
 
I think silver will break below $20.

Buying silver for a long term investment is solid, but anyone who wants to trade it in within 1-5 years should reconsider IMO.
 
Down almost 6% ATM. It's amazing the faith people still have in the USD.

2qc3z2s.png
You would probably have faith in the USD too if you knew that the US regime has billions of dollars of weapons and troops, not to mention the stupidity to use them on a whim. ;)
 
These companies have amazing assets, yet are testing 52 weeks lows.

I'm doubling down, cutting my average share cost by 25%.

At these prices they are prime targets for acquisition/buyouts.

In order of descending desirability (get the top 14 ASAP):

USSIF - US SILVER CORPORATION (Idaho producer)

CGR - CLAUDE RESOURCES (Canada gold producer)

OSKFF - Osisko Mining (Quebec gold producer)

BRD - Brigus Gold (Canada producer)

CMCXF - CMC METALS (Yukon AG producer)

WLDVF - Wildcat Silver (Arizona developer)

RVRCF - REVOLUTION RESOURCES (Carolina gold developer)

RTRAF - ROMARCO MINERALS (Carolina gold developer)

ATADF - ATAC RESOURCES (Yukon gold developer)

KMKGF - Kaminak Gold Corp (Yukon explorer)

GMLFF - Global Minerals (Slovakia AG/CU developer)

UXG - US Gold (AU/AG explorer)

SVROF - SILVER PREDATOR (Yukon explorer)

GPRXF - GOLDEN PREDATOR (Yukon explorer)

GGCRF - SILVERMEX RESOURCES (Mexico producer)

CRECF - CRITICAL ELEMENTS (Canada rare earth explorer)

BGAVF - BRAVADA GOLD (Nevada developer)

NQEXF - NQ EXPLORATION (Canada AU/AG/CU)

NFRGF - NORTHERN FREEGOLD (Yukon AU/AG developer)

PNCKF - Pure Nickel Inc (Alaska Ni/PGM explorer)

BNRJF - BENTON RESOURCES (Canada Au/PGM explorer)

Either you have a lot of money to invest or the transaction costs will eat you alive.

Buy royalty companies. Mining costs will skyrocket when inflation hits hard. Royalty companies are shielded from that and participate only on the upside. SLW, SNDXF.pk, FNV, RGLD are all good picks. I sold my gold miners and will be adding to my royalties.
 
Transactions cost $4 at optionshouse, plus new accounts get 100 free trades. That helped me buy tiny bits of many different companies.

I'm not trading, just investing.

Buy-and-hold, then buy more.

Not ever going to sell anything with silver anywhere under $50.

Maybe I'll get RGLD someday but I don't like streamers, ETFs, or mutual funds because they all introduce additional counterparty risk.

Paper is risky enough already!

My little explorers get bought out, popping up much higher than giants like SLW.
 
Last edited:
Transactions cost $4 at optionshouse, plus new accounts get 100 free trades. That helped me buy tiny bits of many different companies.

I'm not trading, just investing.

Buy-and-hold, then buy more.

Not ever going to sell anything with silver anywhere under $50.

Maybe I'll get RGLD someday but I don't like streamers, ETFs, or mutual funds because they all introduce additional counterparty risk.

Paper is risky enough already!

My little explorers get bought out, popping up much higher than giants like SLW.

What counter party risk is there that is not there with owning the mine outright? The mine has to produce either way and with a royalty company you have a diversified basket of miners who you are dealing with. Of course junior miners are more reward and more risk for now, but inflation will hit their production costs as hard or harder than the big boys.
 
What counter party risk is there that is not there with owning the mine outright?

Good question.

The management, etc. of the streaming company are the additional risky counterparties.

I don't want anyone coming between me and the nice miners who I am lending my capital to.

Look what happened to Silver Wheaton when there was (market perception of) turmoil among their very small staff:

When Barnes unexpectedly tendered his resignation last month, Smallwood was handed the keys to one of the most successful Vancouver business stories of the last decade.

He spent the next few days hunkered down with the company’s key investors and major funds, convincing them the leadership change was well planned.

“The change looks very sudden on the outside, but it wasn’t on the inside,” Smallwood said.

Of course, that depends on how you look at it.

Barnes had never discussed or put a date on retirement during recent marketing campaigns.

In fact, he had just finished guiding the company through a record year, helping it rake in $290 million in net earnings and generate $320 million in cash flow.

When Barnes announced his resignation, Silver Wheaton’s stock peeled back 6%
http://www.bivinteractive.com/index...smallwood-profile&catid=22:profiles&Itemid=39

On April 11th, Peter Barnes resigned as CEO of Silver Wheaton and was replaced by then President Randy Smallwood. Investors are wondering how Randy will continue Silver Wheaton’s momentum. Mining companies will be averse to signing a silver stream contract at $3.90 per ounce when the spot price is $35. A significant upfront payment will be required to make the transaction attractive from the mining companies’ perspective.

Media reports of fund managers calling for $50-100 silver makes Silver Wheaton’s job of attracting new streams much more difficult.
http://seekingalpha.com/article/270037-silver-wheaton-waiting-on-the-next-chapter

Silver Wheaton Corporation: Lackluster performance of late

We are struggling to understand just why silver prices are doing so well and yet the stock price of Silver Wheaton Corporation (SLW) has been lackluster over recent weeks. One explanation could that the resignation of Peter Barnes has had an effect, as changes at the top of any organization sometimes do.

http://www.silver-prices.net/home/2...rporation-lackluster-performance-of-late.html
 
Good question.

The management, etc. of the streaming company are the additional risky counterparties.

I don't want anyone coming between me and the nice miners who I am lending my capital to.

Look what happened to Silver Wheaton when there was (market perception of) turmoil among their very small staff:

If you think it will be a problem acquiring streams for a good price, you should certainly be worried about mines being able to afford to pull the shiny stuff out of the ground. Whenever a good CEO leaves the stock takes a hit. It doesn't mean their business model is dead, not by a long shot.
 
Back
Top