Should this pretend transgender "woman" be allowed to use the ladies room.

Should this pretend transgender woman be allowed to use the ladies room?

  • Yes

    Votes: 4 33.3%
  • No

    Votes: 8 66.7%

  • Total voters
    12

jmdrake

Member
Joined
Jun 6, 2007
Messages
51,992
Note this was a "social experiment." The person doing it is NOT transgender and doesn't pretend to be, although he got "approval" of his transgender friend(s) as being transgender for the days.



Note that most women are extremely uncomfortable with him being there. One woman out of ten made the "politically correct" guess that he was transgender. The rest made the actual correct guess that he was a man in a dress and a wig.
 
Interesting. So far one "no" vote (mine) and one "yes" vote. But no comments from the "yes" camp. Anyone in the "yes" camp care to comment? Note this guy admits he is not transgender and just did this for a "social experiment."
 
Can you imagine the grief HB must goes through.
 
His followup video:



Note that your transgender heroes call women "fish" and yet they aren't bigots because..........? So it's politically correct for a man trying to be a woman to hate women? And I'm guessing you are the one "yes" vote to the poll. Care to explain why you think a guy who is clearly a guy and not even at all transgender should be allowed to use the ladies room?
 
I think that private property owners should be able to determine that. Including allowing men to enter women's restrooms or not. That is what private property rights is about. You don't need government to legislate it either way.
 
Interesting. So far one "no" vote (mine) and one "yes" vote. But no comments from the "yes" camp. Anyone in the "yes" camp care to comment? Note this guy admits he is not transgender and just did this for a "social experiment."

I don't care which restroom anyone uses. I certainly don't want it dictated by the State.
 
There is no point to this insanity.

It's a daily freak show, simply for lulz and attention.

"Lulz and attention." I tend to agree. For the most part. Everyone has to "identify" as something these days it seems. Hell, I won't even "identify" with a political label like the "alt-rights" on these forums feel a hankering for. A daily freak show indeed. Three ring.
 
"Lulz and attention." I tend to agree. For the most part. Everyone has to "identify" as something these days it seems. Hell, I won't even "identify" with a political label like the "alt-rights" on these forums feel a hankering for. A daily freak show indeed. Three ring.
So you're saying you're genderfluid?
 
I have no idea what that even means. Terms are being invented I'd have to quit working to keep up.
I hope this helps. Please study it before you offend someone.

genderbreadperson1008newest.jpg
 
Can you imagine the grief HB must goes through.

+ Rep. I noticed that no one else is brave enough and compassionate enough to discuss this everyday hardship in this thread.
 
I think that private property owners should be able to determine that. Including allowing men to enter women's restrooms or not. That is what private property rights is about. You don't need government to legislate it either way.

That sets up a whole legal nightmare for the property owner. Any person not pleased about who the owner lets in any given bathroom will be sued. Better let our fearless leader set protocol for most of us to follow.
 
Other than being unsightly, what rights were violated? what injury was caused?

Just do your business and leave. We have a President's waging undeclared unconstitutional wars. On a list of things that really truly matter in our day to day lives, this should be at the absolute bottom.
 
We need more government employees checking out "equipment" to make sure everybody is using the "right" bathroom. The survival of our country and even our species depends on it.

Even that Middle America conservative spokesman Garrison Keillor said it silly. http://prairiehome.org/shows/april-2-2016/
 
Last edited:
Back
Top