Should the right to bear arms be unconditional?

[osan]

Richard A Hamblen

I knew I had heard that name somewhere.
I wish you the very best on your case.

I had given up all hope. A this point I will pray for the best. Past experience though,,,,
Best of luck to ya.

What he said. I've read an ac count of your story. Government is, well, crap fro the most part. People do not understand what it is supposed to be in a free nation. All they do is accept the phony baloney lies that are fed them and accept it as truth because it comes from so-called "government". It's disgusting.

I wish you all the best in your struggle against these mobsters. I doubt there is anything I can do to help, but if you think of anything let me know.

 

[Pericles]

Voting is not really a right. It is a privilege of citizenship. Were it a fundamental right then anyone on US soil at election time should be allowed to participate.

I had a brain dead moment. At the end of a penalty, all rights should be restored.

 

[pcosmar]

“Remington Arms Model 700, 12 caliber rifle”

Oops. wrong place

 

[eproxy100]

I don't believe this is true. The 2nd amendment - and all of the amendments were an afterthought. The founders were content with the constitution as is, but the people needed more assurances. States were already in existence, the bill of rights was not created to rein in state power.

How was the bill of rights an "afterthought"? Some of the founding fathers (like Thomas Jefferson) would not sign off on the constitution unless the bill of rights came with it. And does the bill of rights not restrict the states from implementing laws contrary to it?

 

[mikem317]

2 questions on gun ownership....


Do you think people convicted of violent crimes should be allowed to own or bear arms following their conviction?

Do you think a person should be allowed to carry, concealed or openly, while they are drinking alcohol? Should there be a limit like driving? If so, what should it be?

1. No.
2. Yes. No.

 

[Matt Collins]

Here is Rich Hamblen being interviewed on Free Talk Radio last week:
[url]http://www.zshare.net/audio/758008255a995ee5/#[/URL]

 

[mikem317]

2 questions on gun ownership....


Do you think people convicted of violent crimes should be allowed to own or bear arms following their conviction?

Do you think a person should be allowed to carry, concealed or openly, while they are drinking alcohol? Should there be a limit like driving? If so, what should it be?

1. No. Unless it was for lawful self-defense and some politically-motivated DA wants to put away a citizen to get press.
2. Yes. No, unless harm is caused.

 

[osan]

Can anyone be made whole with a felony record?

Of course, if someone completes a sentence, they should be made whole, but is this the case in the USSA today?

The ONLY state in which this happens is, unbelievably, NJ!

When your record is expunged, it is as if it never happened.

Some are trying to change this, I might add.

Shit hole.

 

[M House]

If you've done the punishment for the crime, you should logically have yer rights back.

 

[osan]

The trouble lies when Fathers, Uncles and Older Brothers have already been mind-fucked to believe that the "state" will "protect and serve."

When you see "To protect and serve" on the side of a cop car, have you ever wondered who or what it is that they are protecting and serving?

 

[Mini-Me]

2 questions on gun ownership....


Do you think people convicted of violent crimes should be allowed to own or bear arms following their conviction?

Do you think a person should be allowed to carry, concealed or openly, while they are drinking alcohol? Should there be a limit like driving? If so, what should it be?

1. I think it should be a matter of individual sentencing. After a person has completed their sentence in full, they should be a free man/woman, just like anyone else (regardless of whether their sentence was prison time, involuntary servitude to victims, or whatever). If the court system wishes to prohibit a violent criminal from ever bearing arms again, it should actually be specifically included as part of their individual sentence, not some one-size fits all law...and all sentencing should be determined by juries anyway, not judges or legislation.
2. This falls under "pre-crime" laws like drunk driving, etc...I don't really believe in any of them, but I don't feel like rehashing all the old threads on them. However, private property owners should be able to prohibit whoever they want from carrying firearms, firecrackers, firestarters, flamethrowers, fiery red heads, or fireball candy onto their property.