It's a parasite.
"No reason to kill them." That is insane. I suppose that means if someone has a reason, it is perfectly fine and we shouldn't punish it.
If the mother's life is at risk, abortion is okay, the disease that causes that is 1/100,000 pregnancies anyway, it's not like they could all of the sudden claim everyone is going to die if they don't have their baby murdered.
As for any other case, there is another A-word: adoption. If you don't want it, adopt it out, there are plenty of people who will take it. If we enact our other policies that have to do with the economy, that would also help to fill the adoption roles.
It's a parasite.
No one is advocating the abortion of every baby. I'm just saying that sometimes an abortion could be necessary.
This where I wonder how long the human race has to live, or any intelligent being for that matter. All human instinct says "have as many children as I can support," but because we are so "evolved" we think that it is okay to kill off the unborn and dismiss it because it is a "parasite." When society begins to think this way of its young, it has little time before it totally dies off. Sometimes it is best to listen to your most basic instinct. I am sick of turning onto a sitcom on TV, and having it basically totally bash the mere idea of having children, for men to actually grow up, settle down, and have children, or for women to actually be a mother to their child. It is somehow a burden, not a great joy which all should welcome.
I am saying that abortion is never necessary and all children should be welcomed, and since this is a human life, the government should forbid the practice for it is murder. It is a shame that while a million babies a year die for no good reason, there are people out there looking for children they can't have due to some medical reason, and they can't find one because someone couldn't stand the consequences of their actions.
Stop being so melodramatic. Get a dictionary and look it up. Better yet, I'll save the trouble of book-learnin.
noun
"an organism that lives on or in an organism of another species, known as the host, from the body of which it obtains nutriment."
Oh freaking please. There a tons of situations on where an abortion could be necessary. It's not a life when the sperm hits the egg. If it is then, we should outlaw masturbating. Think of all the possible amounts of babies could be born if that sperm went somewhere!
From the Free Turkey:
Should the government force mothers to look at their children before aborting them?
Clutter it [yongrel's blog] up with a bunch of pictures of choo-choo trains.
Instead of arguing ideologically, let's think about abortion pragmatically.
What would happen if we outlawed abortion tomorrow?
I think you'll find that the consequences are even less desirable.
Stop being so melodramatic. Get a dictionary and look it up. Better yet, I'll save the trouble of book-learnin.
noun
"an organism that lives on or in an organism of another species, known as the host, from the body of which it obtains nutriment."
Oh yes, the "but all those mother will die because they participated in back alley abortions" argument. I don't care if they die. They deserve what happens to them if they are looking to kill their child.
I've been so wrong onthis whole liberty thing. People owning themselves? What nonsense!
My point is that simply outlawing abortion doesn't solve any problems and creates a lot more.
If abortions were outlawed tomorrow, abortions would still take place, likely with near the same frequency as today. The difference? They'd be less safe, more women would die, and valuable doctors would be treated as criminals. Look at what happened with Portugal back when they outlawed abortion. It's not a good situation.
Instead of using the government to back up your position with force, try educating people. Did you read what I wrote in the original post on my website? The responsibility of the pro-life movement is to truly be pro-life, and not just an angry bunch of people praising the deaths of mothers seeking an abortion.