Should Ron be focusing on Michigan, too?

[pcosmar]

My mother has gotten the mailings. She is a registered republican and has been a fan since the first debate, and seeing the Catholics for Ron Paul website. (I bookmarked it for her)
I haven't gotten mailers, (don't need to be converted) but I am an Independent.
Have not heard any Ads on radio up here. Don't know what channel to check.

 

[plopolp]

First, a lens with two foci is a busted lens... So the metapher in the topic question answers itself.

I think there are two optima here. One is local cost/result effeciency. This should be strived for in all states but one. The other is to get a break through somewhere. That would give special bonus nationally through MSM. If this could be achieved in one place before super Tuesday, that'd be great!

So I think that it could be right in theory to campaign economically in all states, except for one targeted winner state. Should it be Nevada or Michigan? Difficult question. Maybe HQ's analysis of IA and NH has told them that Obama-leaning voters cannot be hoped for. Obama got like 2000 votes in Hanover NH, while Ron Paul got somehting like 200. That can be interpreted either as a big problem, or as a great potential... One factor is that Nevada is closer to Super Tuesday and that a success there would look like the revolution momentum is still growing and growing.

Maybe it was a coin toss decision, but it seems like the doctor goes all in, in Nevada!