Should Rand, Cruz and Carson focus on exposing Rubio?

Cruz is currently going after Rubio hard on the Gang of 8 votes. He was on Laura Ingraham today before Rand.
 
I could have sworn I saw Sanders vote Yes in a list of people who voted to end debate.

You sure?
 
Cruz is attacking Rubio on immigration and a Bush PAC is about to drop $20 million to attack Rubio in Iowa and NH.

Hopefully the Bush people won't try to paint Rubio as too conservative. That would probably backfire against both Bush and us.

I'm wondering whether this column is worthy of a separate thread:

Rand Stands for a Winning Republican War Policy (Pat Buchanan)
http://www.theamericanconservative.com/buchanan/rand-stands-for-a-winning-republican-war-policy/

Rand Paul had his best debate moment Tuesday when he challenged Marco Rubio on his plans to increase defense spending by $1 trillion. “You cannot be a conservative if you’re going to keep promoting new programs you’re not going to pay for,” said Paul...

Having called for the U.S. Navy to confront Beijing in the South China Sea, and for establishing a no-fly zone over Syria that Russian pilots would enter at their peril, Rubio seems prepared for a confrontation with either or both of our great rival nuclear powers.

Dismissing Vladimir Putin as a “gangster,” Marco emerged as the toast of the neocons...

From Marco and other voices on stage one hears: Tear up the Iran deal. Confront Putin. Establish a no-fly zone over Syria. Assad must go. Send offensive weapons to Kiev. More boots on the ground in Iraq and Syria. Send U.S. troops to the Baltic and warships to the Black Sea. Confront China in the Spratlys and South China Sea...

Yet, those nationalist strongmen Vladimir Putin and Xi Jinping do not seem to me to be autocrats who are likely to back down when told to do so by Marco Rubio, Jeb Bush, or Carly Fiorina.

http://www.theamericanconservative.com/buchanan/rand-stands-for-a-winning-republican-war-policy/
 
Back
Top