Origanalist
Member
- Joined
- Feb 25, 2012
- Messages
- 43,060
F the new "Skynyrd"... The old band was fantastic. The cover band using their name sucks ass.
I saw Lynyrd Skynyrd, those guys aren't Lynyrd Skynyrd. Not even close.
F the new "Skynyrd"... The old band was fantastic. The cover band using their name sucks ass.
At one time they called it Progressive Rock since it was closely associated with Progressive ideology and in later years then called Classic Rock.
Hold on, is she saying that the people that are elevated by fame are not perfect people? Wow, that's a revelation!![]()
:bigpoo:
There are a lot of things I revere about “Brown Sugar,” and Mr. Richards’s guitar riffs not least. But I can tell you that in 50 years, it has not once occurred to me that this song might even remotely be about the empowerment of Black women. If the Stones don’t know why the song has to go, does simply removing it from their tour sheet go far enough?
No, that would not be enough, the next phases will include cancellation, asset forfeiture, re-education camp, and essential elimination.
And yet the guitarist Keith Richards, when asked about the removal, seemed a little uneasy with the decision: “I’m trying to figure out with the sisters quite where the beef is. Didn’t they understand this was a song about the horrors of slavery?”
There are a lot of things I revere about “Brown Sugar,” and Mr. Richards’s guitar riffs not least. But I can tell you that in 50 years, it has not once occurred to me that this song might even remotely be about the empowerment of Black women. If the Stones don’t know why the song has to go, does simply removing it from their tour sheet go far enough?
Dafuq is this clown yapping about? 
If Rap music can stand when the lyrics to many songs degrade women as bitches & Whores wtf?
F the new "Skynyrd"... The old band was fantastic. The cover band using their name sucks ass.
I saw Lynyrd Skynyrd, those guys aren't Lynyrd Skynyrd. Not even close.
I did not miss the point and totally get that. It is just that when I look really closely at it, we all got played. We tend to have rose colored glasses about the past due to life long conditioning. We listened to and enjoyed Progressive rockers with close ties to the elites. People that stand against many of the things we believe and support politicians we hate. Those are the facts.
At one time they called it Progressive Rock since it was closely associated with Progressive ideology and in later years then called Classic Rock. We all live in somewhat our own illusion so we can enjoy life and memory holed that fact to live our illusion. Now we are supposed to get all teary eyed because the people that helped get us to where we are now might be taken down a peg. I don't think so.
This is from a fan that spent most of my life listening to all forms of rock for hours a day and attending concerts. So this is not like I hate the genre and are rather a lifelong fan. I like sitting around a fire to, I just don't put my hand in it and ruin my life. People took the art form to a whole new level and part of that is due to how it was marketed that way at one time.
For example the genre brought an entire generation to buy into the immorality of sex, drugs and rock'n roll. Look at the destruction of white communities due to the drug problem and broken families. Granted people should not have been so weak and simply enjoyed it without changing their life to reflect a slogan as part of the art form.
So I am not going to get all teary eyed if someone attacks it. Maybe, just maybe, it will wake people up to a new form of rock from people that actually believe in the liberty of others and not push heroin use as a cool virtue.
Telling the truth about why things are the way they are and are not going to change until people wake up is not obsessive. Years ago I would never have said that to you since you got it. Some where along the line you jumped on the game one up news cycle bandwagon to live that false illusion here. That is a dead end and the only benefit is Ad dollars and establishment party building. Nothing will ever change if people continue down that path of getting played, to not look long term, identify the enemy and their propaganda methods. That means waking up to our own illusions at times including our pleasures like how we looked the other way on this genre.
If Marxist's try to destroy Classic Rock which is really doubtful, since when it comes down to it they are mostly on the same side, we - the opposition should be there to present the alternative (no pun intended) from artists that truly believe in liberty and the rights of women and children.
Progressive rock had nothing at all to do with "progressive" Marxist political ideology.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Progressive_rock
Most all creative types are lefties.
Thus it has always been, all the way back to Homer.
Saw them, enjoyed them. What are you going to do when the singer and driver of the band dies? Yeah, he’s gone, no disputing that.
[MENTION=1874]Brian4Liberty[/MENTION] and link AF provided:Progressive rock had nothing at all to do with "progressive" Marxist political ideology.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Progressive_rock
Most all creative types are lefties.
Thus it has always been, all the way back to Homer.
In early references to the music, "progressive" was partly related to progressive politics, but those connotations were lost during the 1970s
Let his little brother team up with some of his old bandmates, steal all his songs and try to live his life??
[MENTION=1874]Brian4Liberty[/MENTION] and link AF provided:
When you are young everyone was left wing so it was a cool thing. Not so much anymore, the association is almost totally ignored these days simply because people are more aware and they do not want it to effect sales.
Sure, if you want to ignore the entire wikipedia description and focus on a single line that some douchebag inserted in there.