Should abortion be legal?

Should abortion be legal?

  • Yes

    Votes: 15 25.0%
  • No

    Votes: 28 46.7%
  • Yes but only until a certain point. (say first 2 months)

    Votes: 11 18.3%
  • Other: explain

    Votes: 6 10.0%

  • Total voters
    60
"Right to choose" is merely bogus BULLSHIT PR marketing cooked up by the PRO-ABORTION crowd and movement, to sell better.

This sort of derangement makes you less than a human being in my view.

You are not pro-life. You are anti-choice.
 
Hairless? Testosterone shortage?

Nope, I'm bigger. 6'5", 240 lbs., and significantly older and wiser, WITH an Uzi. :D

your an idiot and should qft!

btw: an abortion is murder only in a idiots church brainwashed head like yours.....

btw ill kick your ass without an uzi, punk....
 
your an idiot and should qft!

btw: an abortion is murder only in a idiots church brainwashed head like yours.....

btw ill kick your ass without an uzi, punk....

DAFTEK.

Don't bite off more than you can chew.

Easy son.
 
Make sure you go to the range and train.

Otherwise you might shoot yourself in the foot.
 
This sort of derangement makes you less than a human being in my view.

You are not pro-life. You are anti-choice.
I'm not "anti-choice", I'm anti-Death. What is the "choice"? Life or DEATH! Pro-life requires no friggen "choice" ( so called ). How many MILLIONS since Roe v. Wade, so far and counting? PREVENT unwanted pregnancies!!!! My totally consistent position, ALWAYS.

You're view is WHACKED!<IMHO> Keep on digging. :rolleyes:
 
Make sure you go to the range and train.

Otherwise you might shoot yourself in the foot.
I trained plenty don't worry, i suggest you take your own advise thou and worry about your own foot....
 
your an idiot and should qft!

btw: an abortion is murder only in a idiots church brainwashed head like yours.....

btw ill kick your ass without an uzi, punk....
What church, asshat? You're just totally full of shit TOO. :rolleyes:

You'd just better bring the WHOLE flock along with you. :p
 
Every breath you take you kill some living organisms, some even bigger than what is killed by a "morning after" pill. The "right to life" doesn't come from your irrational compassion, it comes from it being a competitive advantage: societies that don't recognize the right to life are too violent for any civilized cooperation to take place and have never made it out of the stone age. Societies that have unlimited irrational respect for all living things, like some radical Buddhists, can't even build a house foundation without evacuating all the earthworms first - you can imagine what that does to their ability to compete in a modern globalized economy. Giving animals rights also has many problems: they cannot be expected to respect the property of others, and animal experiments are the backbone of modern science.

The ideal society recognizes the right of human beings to self-ownership based on when those human beings become a tangible entity within the society. The "right to life" cannot exist before physical autonomy is achieved: a fetus cannot sue to prevent eviction any more than your toe nails can (and some people might have different DNA in their toe nails than their brain). And the rights to liberty and property cannot exist before the entity is capable of being a rational judgment in one's own self-interest, that is as the result of suing for emancipation from one's parents or reaching a certain age of maturity, whichever comes first.

What the "anti-choice" crowd is doing is granting the government higher authority over one's body and/or one's children, and that is diametrically opposed to everything that libertarianism stands for!
 
A consistent libertarian position on abortion is this:
Government should not interfere abortion. Government should also not interfere with privately organized, privately funded mobs that want to lynch abortionists. Interestingly, it's pretty rare to find anyone who takes such a consistent position. Why aren't pro-choicers defending "freedom of choice" for lynch mobs?
 
FUCK the government.

Support and cherish mothers.

Ultimately, allow them their decision.

It is arrogance to assume otherwise.
 
Yes, that's what libertarians do all day, kill babies. That is what defines us as a movement, as opposed to authoritarians, who would never kill a baby. Authoritarianism has done wonders for babies. Especially in China.
 
Fuck "society". It's only a concept and an "abstraction". It does NOT exist, in the REAL world. :rolleyes:

Collectivist phony BS propaganda!!! :p
 
... and there's absolutely positively no moral difference between forced abortions and prohibition of abortions. Zilch. Nada. Zip. Zero.

If you don't believe in self ownership, it doesn't matter if you're "pro-life" or not today, the powers that you entrust to make that decision on behalf of the individual can change their mind tomorrow.
 
A consistent libertarian position on abortion is this:
Government should not interfere abortion. Government should also not interfere with privately organized, privately funded mobs that want to lynch abortionists. Interestingly, it's pretty rare to find anyone who takes such a consistent position. Why aren't pro-choicers defending "freedom of choice" for lynch mobs?
Where's YOUR libertarian "Non-Aggression Principle"? Rookies! :rolleyes:
 
Back
Top