Sheriff Joe Arpaio: I Spoke with Andrew Breitbart Shortly Before he Died

So funny how the crazies are out in force. His family said he died of natural causes, but THEY MUST HAVE said it because they were threatened. I mean nobody ever just dies in there 40's of a heart attack or the like. NEVER!

So disrespectful to the family to say they are lying.
 
Another perspective about this ... I damned sure want him to have it, if he ever has to face down the FED's !!!

Shit. He gets that shit from the Feds. He is in their pocket.
This Tank was used to destroy a Chicken Farm for a media event with Steven Seagull.

And though the birth cert is questionable,, It is going nowhere and IS a distraction.
 
Shit. He gets that shit from the Feds. He is in their pocket.
This Tank was used to destroy a Chicken Farm for a media event with Steven Seagull.

And though the birth cert is questionable,, It is going nowhere and IS a distraction.

Yup. Anyone who thinks Arpaio is a friend of liberty or a foe of the police state is fooling themselves.
 
Can you say federal witch-hunt? And the DOJ can't prove anything but continues to demonize with all the racially motivated nonsense with emanates from the usual suspects in La Raza and the ADL. Sheriff Joe is daring Holder to take his department to federal court.

http://www.wnd.com/2012/01/sheriff-joe-to-eric-holder-prove-it/

Nor was Arpaio concerned that the DOJ might take him and his sheriff’s department to federal court.

“If the Justice Department wants to take me to court, I’m ready,” Arpaio said.

Arpaio was responding to a statement emailed today to WND in which the DOJ threatened to go to court immediately rather than show Arpaio’s office and the U.S. public the evidence it claims to have.

“If MCSO wants to debate the facts instead of fixing the problems stated in our findings, we will do so by way of litigation,” DOJ said in the statement.

The statement implied the DOJ already has rejected an offer of cooperation made yesterday by attorneys representing MCSO in a cover letter to the MCSO 38-page response to the DOJ complaint.

In the cover letter, Arpaio attorney Joseph J. Popolizio made it clear that the sheriff was willing to cooperate with Holder and the DOJ, but only if the DOJ revealed to the MCSO and the public its proof.

“Sheriff Joseph M. Arpaio and the MCSO are certainly interested in constructive dialogue, but constructive dialogue can only occur if the DOJ provides the facts and information on which it bases its findings,” Popolizio wrote.
 
Last edited:
Shit. He gets that shit from the Feds. He is in their pocket.
This Tank was used to destroy a Chicken Farm for a media event with Steven Seagull.

And though the birth cert is questionable,, It is going nowhere and IS a distraction.

Holder and Napolitano have been trying to get rid of him for close to 3 years. Sure, he's in their pocket. ROFL
 
Last edited:
Holder and Napolitano have been trying to get rid of him for close to 3 years. Sure, he's in their pocket. ROFL

You're right: he's not in their pocket, he's full blown lips-on-asshole:

98wz_rp_hunt_arizona_tank.jpg
 
Last edited:
was that supposed to be an example? I didn't see anything. What aspects of the federal government has Arpaio ever stood up against? I'm not hating, just want some solid examples.

I offered up the video so that you know he stands firmly with Sheriff Mack.

Look there is a lot wrong with this country-- make no mistake, one of which are the unconstitutional laws, there is no denying it. Nevertheless, we have seen a lot of good things come our way with sheriffs banding together to throw the feds out of their county and their state. I am all for decriminalizing drugs, prostitution and alcohol penalties--but we have got to leave it up to the states and the people in them to change them. But until we do that, we have to understand what the sheriff's roles are. The sheriff has more power than the President.



I would think going up against the President is taking a stand.
 
Last edited:
I offered up the video so that you know he stands firmly with Sheriff Mack.
Sorry, but he isn't gonna get a pass because of that. I like Mack, he has an actual record to look at and compare to.

I would think going up against the President is taking a stand.
He's been in office for 2 decades and that is all you got? How many bad things has he supported in that 2 decades. Pfft..
 
Holder and Napolitano have been trying to get rid of him for close to 3 years. Sure, he's in their pocket. ROFL

Holder and Napolitano are not "the Fed". They are minor and temporary functionaries. Puppets on strings. Place holders till the next replacement comes along.
If the FEDGOV wanted him out he would be gone already.
 
So funny how the crazies are out in force. His family said he died of natural causes, but THEY MUST HAVE said it because they were threatened. I mean nobody ever just dies in there 40's of a heart attack or the like. NEVER!

So disrespectful to the family to say they are lying.

Did his family do an autopsy we don't know about, or were they relating the early story they were provided that has since been retracted as to the cause of death?

Who called the family member liars? Perhaps they were just misinformed and trusting without verifying.
 
Last edited:
Sorry, but he isn't gonna get a pass because of that. I like Mack, he has an actual record to look at and compare to.


He's been in office for 2 decades and that is all you got? How many bad things has he supported in that 2 decades. Pfft..

That sounds like the same analogy the opponents for Dr. Paul say, "He's been in office 2 decades and what has he accomplished?"


If the people of Maricopa County think he is so bad, why do they continuously vote him in?


Then second thing I look for is the very fact that the Feds are targeting him. The sewer stream news maligns him as well. Neither of those two entities are friends to liberty! A few months ago, I didn't have a good thought about Sheriff Joe Arpaio because I only heard about him through the sewer stream news. However, I have decided to step out of the box and investigate him on my own.

Now if you can provide some facts, not media conjecture or subterfuge about Arpaio I will be happy to look into it and go from there.
 
That sounds like the same analogy the opponents for Dr. Paul say, "He's been in office 2 decades and what has he accomplished?"


If the people of Maricopa County think he is so bad, why do they continuously vote him in?


Then second thing I look for is the very fact that the Feds are targeting him. The sewer stream news maligns him as well. Neither of those two entities are friends to liberty! A few months ago, I didn't have a good thought about Sheriff Joe Arpaio because I only heard about him through the sewer stream news. However, I have decided to step out of the box and investigate him on my own.

Now if you can provide some facts, not media conjecture or subterfuge about Arpaio I will be happy to look into it and go from there.

He's never seriously challenged. His office is seriously corrupt and has managed to piss off everyone to some degree or another (even those who typically lick his boots). If you only listen to national coverage of Joe, you're only getting a small understanding of what an ass and criminal he is. One of the reasons Charles Goyette was fired from KFYI is because he was very critical of the misdeeds of Joe and TPTB in general. There aren't any more journalists who take a critical look at Arpaio nowadays AFAIK. :(
 
Don Lapre said:
It's a BLATANT forgery.

Of course it is. Now what good is this information actually going to do us?

Hopefully it will lead to Barry's removal from office ---> and remove the possibility that the ignorant sheeple can vote for a communist felon to hold the highest office in the land for 4 more years.
 
That sounds like the same analogy the opponents for Dr. Paul say, "He's been in office 2 decades and what has he accomplished?"


If the people of Maricopa County think he is so bad, why do they continuously vote him in?


Then second thing I look for is the very fact that the Feds are targeting him. The sewer stream news maligns him as well. Neither of those two entities are friends to liberty! A few months ago, I didn't have a good thought about Sheriff Joe Arpaio because I only heard about him through the sewer stream news. However, I have decided to step out of the box and investigate him on my own.

Now if you can provide some facts, not media conjecture or subterfuge about Arpaio I will be happy to look into it and go from there.

Big money is at a stake, with the daily transport of illegal drugs, migrant workers and sex slaves & they're making an example of Arpaio. Sheriff is a position of incredible power in this country very few are aware of, so if they can squash that notion in it's infancy, half the battle is won.

The feds are irate that Arpaio is (1) actually enforcing the federal law and (2) throwing away the politically correct parameters they have instituted. The plutocrats who run this country, whether they are servants of neoliberalism or neoconservatism want to see the steady stream of illegal labor and drugs continue unabated. Like they say follow the money and old time sheriffs like Arpaio are not good for business. Wall Street is partially financed by illegal drug profits for Christ's sake.
 
Last edited:
That sounds like the same analogy the opponents for Dr. Paul say, "He's been in office 2 decades and what has he accomplished?"

Not even close. I can look at Dr. Paul's record and see that he HAS stood up against the fed. He has never voted for more spending or taxes. never voted to pass unconstitional laws. the analogy isn't even worth the bits you used to type that out. For 2 decades it sounds like he has supported the growing federal government. Now we are supposed to give a crap what he says about the birth certificate nonsense? gtfo with that. And to smear Mack by trying to say Arpaio is like him? please...
 
Hopefully it will lead to Barry's removal from office ---> and remove the possibility that the ignorant sheeple can vote for a communist felon to hold the highest office in the land for 4 more years.

A case could not even get through court in time to remove him from office,,
And unless Ron Paul is elected you can bet the next one will be worse.
 
A case could not even get through court in time to remove him from office,,
And unless Ron Paul is elected you can bet the next one will be worse.

Of course a case won't get through a court in time.
You saw the Georgia debacle?

We have no mainstream media and we have no courts.


Barry will soon be completely toxic, however.

No matter how hard the media tries to keep this down, down it will not stay.

It's known that felonies have been committed and much more is going to come out.



specs said:
Not even close. I can look at Dr. Paul's record and see that he HAS stood up against the fed. He has never voted for more spending or taxes. never voted to pass unconstitional laws. the analogy isn't even worth the bits you used to type that out. For 2 decades it sounds like he has supported the growing federal government. Now we are supposed to give a crap what he says about the birth certificate nonsense? gtfo with that.

Birth certificate nonsense?

LOL

Do you think that thing that was produced on April 27, 2011 was legit?

DO you think felonies were not committed?

Funny man.


Hey, say what you will about Arpaio.
I don't care.
He's taking a stand here against felonies committed against YOU and all of us.

Ron Paul has been in a position as a congressman to SPEAK UP about Barry's illegitimate presidency, and he's been silent.

No nuts.

VERY disappointed in him on this issue.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top