Sharon Angle gains 20 points in a month in NV Senate bid

[Imperial]

Maybe, but would attack the pro-war who supports abolishing the dept of education and is right on everything else, knowing that you'll run the risk of getting Lowden elected? And remember you're doing that for someone who is not pro gun and seems to be fine with the Department of Education. From my point of view, it's anyone but Lowden.

In the real-world you won't be able to abolish the Department of Education. Tark does advocate cuts to it.

 

[tangent4ronpaul]

blimp

 

[The Patriot]

The other thing to remember is Angle is the one candidate who actually stands a good chance of not winning the seat in the General election. Scientology is the last remaining socially acceptable prejudice, and her ties to that are going to be poison in the General Election.

My bottom line- I don't really care. There clearly aren't any true liberty candidates running in Nevada and every single one of the three have SERIOUS problems with respect to their stances on the issues, so I think I'm going to concentrate my attention on other states where more support worthy candidates can be found. I feel for Nevada voters, but I'm in the same bind here in Florida with the neocon Rubio sure to win the primary, Crist being even worse, and the Democrats offering a Maxine Waters clone. Ugh.

I am prejudice towards scientologists. They are kooks. That should pretty much settle it, she is a unelectable nutjob.

 

[Pizza God]

I am prejudice towards scientologists. They are kooks. That should pretty much settle it, she is a unelectable nutjob.

Will I know several Scientologist, and even thought I would never become one, I do know they mostly supported Liberty Candidates.

The Libertarian running against John Cornyn in Texas was a Scientologist. I voted for her because Cornyn voted for the TARP bail out, I will never vote for him again.

Also, one of the leaders in my area's Ron Paul movement and the Tea Party movement is also a Scientologist. I don't tell people about it because of attitudes like yours. (also, every Scientologist I know voted for Ron Paul in the Primaries and Debra Medina for Governor)

To people involved in the church, it is good for them. There leader is a jerk, but the teachings are good.

So what I am saying is that you may not like the Church, but that does not mean the people involved in the church are bad people. I have found the teachings of L Ron Hubbard to be very Libertarian. (yes, I have read a few books)

On that note, the reason I was looking for the Liberty movements view of Angle

http://www.politicsdaily.com/2010/0...harron-angle-in-lead-for-gop-senate-nod-in-n/

She is now leading in the polls!!!!!!!!!!

 

[South Park Fan]

I am prejudice towards scientologists. They are kooks. That should pretty much settle it, she is a unelectable nutjob.

No more kooky than any other religious group.

 

[Bergie Bergeron]

Being religious is what's kooky IMO.

 

[HOLLYWOOD]

The other thing to remember is Angle is the one candidate who actually stands a good chance of not winning the seat in the General election. Scientology is the last remaining socially acceptable prejudice, and her ties to that are going to be poison in the General Election.

My bottom line- I don't really care. There clearly aren't any true liberty candidates running in Nevada and every single one of the three have SERIOUS problems with respect to their stances on the issues, so I think I'm going to concentrate my attention on other states where more support worthy candidates can be found. I feel for Nevada voters, but I'm in the same bind here in Florida with the neocon Rubio sure to win the primary, Crist being even worse, and the Democrats offering a Maxine Waters clone. Ugh.

The True Liberty Candidate was: MD Robin Titus... not related to that Socialist Congressman Dina Titus. She dropped out due to lack of funding.


Let's make one thing very clear: Danny Tartanian is a Liberal Democrat running under the cloak of a Republican. He has voted, supported, and donated to Democrats. Yes I understand there's some Blue Dogs, that are better that Liberal Neocons, but the ENTIRE TARTANIAN FAMILY are lifetime Democrats. Even Danny's mother is a Democrat in the Las Vegas council/government. All three have supported/donated to Democrats, so don't buy into the populist, "I'll do this and I'll do that" campaign gimmicks.

Angle is the closest to the liberty candidate and has always backed ENDING the IRS and Auditing the FEDERAL RESERVE.

Sharron Angle is backed by the REAL TEA PARTY in Nevada... and it's members are the most Libertarian and Constitutionalists out of any State in the nation.

So all the TEA parties in Nevada support Angle. She's a northern Nevadan, what makes it better than the Carpet-Bagging Socialistic transplants from California that have consumed Clark county (LAS VEGAS)

VOTE and BACK only SHARRON ANGLE.

Screw Sue Lowden... that NEOCON RINO PARTY FIRSTER is going DOWN.

The Only problem we have is the MSM Media is bought by the 2 parties. Reno-Gazette and the Las Vegas Sun constantly support Lowden and Tartanian or marginalize Sharron Angle. (I presume, sending lots of advertising money their way via the Big National Party Duopoly)

Donate to Angle and plug every comment on every piece of Blogisphere for Angle.

Nevada Thanx you all!

 

[majinkoola]

I don't care who wins as long as it's not Lowden. Harry Reid included. Nobody messes with RP like she did and gets away with it.

 

[0zzy]

Being religious is what's kooky IMO.

You may think so, but Scientology is a horrid "Church." It's a money scheme cult which has killed people before and uses lawyers to kill anyone's reputation in a heartbeat.

This interview made me really, really not like the "Church" of Scientology. The people are simply pawns, and they make me wonder how ever they got brainwashed into it, but I will not condemn them for simply being apart of this "Church."

http://www.xenutv.com/blog/?p=121