acptulsa
Member
- Joined
- Jan 2, 2008
- Messages
- 75,640
Agreed. I'd like to see a national epidemic of it.
Settle for Less, You White Bastards!
- Thread starter Anti Federalist
- Start date
Agreed. I'd like to see a national epidemic of it.
Swordsmyth
Member
- Joined
- Apr 14, 2016
- Messages
- 74,737
I knew you would respond like that.
Anti Federalist
Member
- Joined
- Aug 31, 2007
- Messages
- 117,754
California population growth slowest since 1900 as residents leave, immigration decelerates
https://www.latimes.com/california/...-decline-with-state-emigration-a-major-factor
“California was the place, the big destination, for people around the country and around the world,” says the Brookings Institution’s William Frey. “It’s lost its luster a little bit.(Luis Sinco / Los Angeles Times)
By JULIA BARAJAS, SARAH PARVINI DEC. 21, 2019 8:30 AM
The Golden State remains stuck in the slow lane when it comes to population.
The number of Californians increased to 39.96 million, with new data from the Department of Finance showing mostly downward trends.
They are rooted in fewer births, coupled with increased deaths among an aging population. The Golden State, however, has also seen changes in international migration, along with more and more residents leaving the state.
The estimates, which indicate that California’s population grew by 141,300 people between July 1, 2018, and July 1, 2019, nonetheless signal a 0.35% growth rate, “down from 0.57% for the prior 12 months — the two lowest recorded growth rates since 1900,” department officials underscored.
According to the agency, natural increase (with 452,200 births and 271,400 deaths) accounted for an additional 180,800 people to the state. Still, these gains were offset by losses in net migration — that is, the total amount of people moving into the state minus the total amount of people moving out. Notably, said Eddie Hunsinger, a demographer with the Department of Finance, even though the net international migration added to the state’s population, there was substantial negative domestic net migration, which resulted in a loss of 39,500 residents. This, said the department, marks “the first time since the 2010 Census that California has had more people leaving the state than moving in from abroad or other states.”
William Frey, a senior fellow at the Brookings Institution, said Friday’s findings follow a trend that demographers have seen over several years. While California has always seen domestic outmigration — people moving to other states — the rate has grown over the last decade.
“For some years after the Great Recession housing crunch, California was losing domestic migrants — but not as much as it could have. Now that’s starting to push up again,” Frey said.
The most common destinations for those leaving the state were Arizona, Colorado, Nevada, Oregon, Texas and Washington, he said, as the economy has picked up throughout the west and other parts of the country. Aside from a lower cost-of-living, some Californians are drawn to areas with no state income tax.
https://www.latimes.com/california/...-decline-with-state-emigration-a-major-factor
“California was the place, the big destination, for people around the country and around the world,” says the Brookings Institution’s William Frey. “It’s lost its luster a little bit.(Luis Sinco / Los Angeles Times)
By JULIA BARAJAS, SARAH PARVINI DEC. 21, 2019 8:30 AM
The Golden State remains stuck in the slow lane when it comes to population.
The number of Californians increased to 39.96 million, with new data from the Department of Finance showing mostly downward trends.
They are rooted in fewer births, coupled with increased deaths among an aging population. The Golden State, however, has also seen changes in international migration, along with more and more residents leaving the state.
The estimates, which indicate that California’s population grew by 141,300 people between July 1, 2018, and July 1, 2019, nonetheless signal a 0.35% growth rate, “down from 0.57% for the prior 12 months — the two lowest recorded growth rates since 1900,” department officials underscored.
According to the agency, natural increase (with 452,200 births and 271,400 deaths) accounted for an additional 180,800 people to the state. Still, these gains were offset by losses in net migration — that is, the total amount of people moving into the state minus the total amount of people moving out. Notably, said Eddie Hunsinger, a demographer with the Department of Finance, even though the net international migration added to the state’s population, there was substantial negative domestic net migration, which resulted in a loss of 39,500 residents. This, said the department, marks “the first time since the 2010 Census that California has had more people leaving the state than moving in from abroad or other states.”
William Frey, a senior fellow at the Brookings Institution, said Friday’s findings follow a trend that demographers have seen over several years. While California has always seen domestic outmigration — people moving to other states — the rate has grown over the last decade.
“For some years after the Great Recession housing crunch, California was losing domestic migrants — but not as much as it could have. Now that’s starting to push up again,” Frey said.
The most common destinations for those leaving the state were Arizona, Colorado, Nevada, Oregon, Texas and Washington, he said, as the economy has picked up throughout the west and other parts of the country. Aside from a lower cost-of-living, some Californians are drawn to areas with no state income tax.
tfurrh
Member
- Joined
- Jun 30, 2011
- Messages
- 3,265
Would that be unsettling?
Swordsmyth
Member
- Joined
- Apr 14, 2016
- Messages
- 74,737
For the left it will be very unsettling.
Similar threads
