September here, and college football starting up

[The Gold Standard]

Yeah , wish we could have gotten BC or Tenn or even Fla State.

I think Indiana would kill Boston College. I've seen 6-6 Indiana teams before, but this team is really pretty decent. Best Indiana defense I've seen since I was a kid. They can give Utah a fight if they play well, but I don't know if the coach leaving will be a distraction.

 

[NorthCarolinaLiberty]

Looks like a lot of toilet bowl games. It seems to me that all the reasons people gave for not having a playoff evaporated.

One argument was the traditional bowl venues would be gone. Looks like they did not even stick to that with just four teams. And sorry, the Fiesta Bowl is not a real bowl. Fiesta was a crappy car made by Ford, which they're now trying to pawn off on British asexuals in the UK.

Another argument against a playoff with home teams was cold weather. Well, I see the provincial New Yorkers got a game in Yankee Stadium to pay for that corporate crony project.

Another argument was not playing too close to the holidays, but I see Middle TN plays in Hawaii Christmas Eve. I doubt they're taking a red eye back to the mainland. They've always played around the holidays anyway, so that didn't matter. They even used to have the Blue-Grey game on Christmas.

I don't even want to look at who is playing in the Cotton Bowl. Yeah, talk about traditional venues they did not want to sacrifice. What a disgrace that bowl became. But lo and behold, CBS is still clinging to the Sun Bowl for the millionth year. Guess the guy who signed that crappy contract must be dead by now.

There is now the Motel 6 Bowl? Really? That bed bug haven is now not even a good place to flop for 7 hours.

What happened to any games on New Year's Day? Teams are traveling for games on Dec. 26, Dec. 24, etc. so they miss Christmas, but no games on New Years? Instead they put on some outdoor hockey game where the seats are a half mile away from the rink.

On the plus side, E Michigan gets to go to the Bahamas. Too bad for Penn State not making the big four. No, sorry Penn State, not putting the players' names on the jerseys doesn't mean you have some teamwork integrity. You still get sent to the child molester bowl.

I guess there's a few interesting match-ups in the non-championship games, but it ain't much. Western Michigan-Wisconsin would have actually been a good second round game in my 32 team playoff proposal. I would have seeded an undefeated WMU higher, so the Badgers have to go to Grand Rapids. What a crazy venue that would be. I must be the only genius who sees this. They probably have high school interns working for the NCAA now.

I suppose there's some interesting games, but, for the most part, this vindicates why I've never bought cable and never will.

And now my whole cantankerous post concludes with one big......

 

[oyarde]

Looks like a lot of toilet bowl games. It seems to me that all the reasons people gave for not having a playoff evaporated.

One argument was the traditional bowl venues would be gone. Looks like they did not even stick to that with just four teams. And sorry, the Fiesta Bowl is not a real bowl. Fiesta was a crappy car made by Ford, which they're now trying to pawn off on British asexuals in the UK.

Another argument against a playoff with home teams was cold weather. Well, I see the provincial New Yorkers got a game in Yankee Stadium to pay for that corporate crony project.

Another argument was not playing too close to the holidays, but I see Middle TN plays in Hawaii Christmas Eve. I doubt they're taking a red eye back to the mainland. They've always played around the holidays anyway, so that didn't matter. They even used to have the Blue-Grey game on Christmas.

I don't even want to look at who is playing in the Cotton Bowl. Yeah, talk about traditional venues they did not want to sacrifice. What a disgrace that bowl became. But lo and behold, CBS is still clinging to the Sun Bowl for the millionth year. Guess the guy who signed that crappy contract must be dead by now.

There is now the Motel 6 Bowl? Really? That bed bug haven is now not even a good place to flop for 7 hours.

What happened to any games on New Year's Day? Teams are traveling for games on Dec. 26, Dec. 24, etc. so they miss Christmas, but no games on New Years? Instead they put on some outdoor hockey game where the seats are a half mile away from the rink.

On the plus side, E Michigan gets to go to the Bahamas. Too bad for Penn State not making the big four. No, sorry Penn State, not putting the players' names on the jerseys doesn't mean you have some teamwork integrity. You still get sent to the child molester bowl.

I guess there's a few interesting match-ups in the non-championship games, but it ain't much. Western Michigan-Wisconsin would have actually been a good second round game in my 32 team playoff proposal. I would have seeded an undefeated WMU higher, so the Badgers have to go to Grand Rapids. What a crazy venue that would be. I must be the only genius who sees this. They probably have high school interns working for the NCAA now.

I suppose there's some interesting games, but, for the most part, this vindicates why I've never bought cable and never will.

And now my whole cantankerous post concludes with one big......

I feel like this sometimes , but then Sat. , I will watch Army / Navy and be cleansed .

 

[oyarde]

Hmm; I like it.

I'd like to see one of those mascot fist fights between the Mastodon's Don and the Crimson Tide's Big Al.

Mastodons at undefeated Notre Dame tonight I think . Kentucky lost to UCLA .

 

[Jan2017]

Playoffs: Alabama vs Washington and Clemson vs Ohio State

Pac-8 . . . I mean Pac-10 . . . I mean Pac-12 with a team in the playoffs' for first time in this third year of playoffs going against the defending champs.

Colorado preseason predicted as 6th place in Pac12 South, and end up winning the division with a 10-win regular season.
Washington Huskies owned the line of scrimmage but Buffaloes success should help recruiting alot.

 

[The Gold Standard]

Pac-8 . . . I mean Pac-10 . . . I mean Pac-12 with a team in the playoffs' for first time in this third year of playoffs going against the defending champs.

Oregon was in the first playoff.

 

[Jan2017]

Oregon was in the first playoff.

Ypu're right . . . my bad. I guess all I remembered was fourth seed Ohio State winning it all - validating the concept for a playoff.
A play-in game in the future (?) for 4 with a 5th seed this year would be Washington v. (Michigan ?)

 

[Zippyjuan]

Pre-season Pac12 poll:

The media poll has correctly selected the Conference Champion in 29 of 55 previous polls, but only twice in the last nine polls. Following are the results of the preseason media poll (points 6-5-4-3-2-1, first-place votes in parentheses):

North Division
1. Stanford (24) 186
2. Washington (8) 163
3. Oregon (1) 132
4. Washington State 112
5. California 67
6. Oregon State 33

South Division

1. UCLA (19) 180
2. USC (12) 173
3. Utah (2) 127
4. Arizona 87
5. Arizona State 85
6. Colorado 63

Final standings:

North:
Washington
Washington State
Stanford
Oregon State
California
Oregon

South:
Colorado
USC
Utah
Arizona State
UCLA
Arizona

This is the first year since expansion that neither Oregon nor Stanford won the title.

 

[euphemia]

The so-called playoff system stinks. Last year they left TCU out supposedly because they didn't have a conference championship game. So Ohio State doesn't make their championship game and they get to play for a national championship? How does that work, exactly?

 

[oyarde]

My High School lost the State Championship game 13 - 16 . I thought we would win , I figured , Hey , 20 points will win it .

 

[The Gold Standard]

The so-called playoff system stinks. Last year they left TCU out supposedly because they didn't have a conference championship game. So Ohio State doesn't make their championship game and they get to play for a national championship? How does that work, exactly?

That isn't the only criteria they use. In fact, it isn't one at all. It is like a tiebreaker if two teams look close to each other when they rank them.

In 2014, when Baylor and TCU got jumped by Ohio State after the conference championship, when comparing the three, you had a Baylor that had beaten two ranked teams, TCU and Kansas State, and lost to a mediocre West Virginia team, you had TCU who had beaten two ranked teams, Minnesota and Kansas State, and lost to Baylor, and you had Ohio State who had beaten two ranked teams before the championship game, Michigan State and Minnesota, and lost to a mediocre Virginia Tech team. After the conference title game, Ohio State had beaten three ranked teams, had won 11 in a row, was a conference champion, and looked better than TCU and Baylor (they do use the eye test too). If the Big XII had a title game, Baylor would have played in it because they beat TCU, and they would have had the chance to add another ranked win to their resume, and that may or may not have put them above Ohio State who had just beaten a ranked team 59-0.

This year, comparing Ohio State and Penn State, Ohio State beat Big XII champion #7 Oklahoma and Big Ten runner up #8 Wisconsin on the road, #6 Michigan at home, and lost by 3 points on the road to #5 Penn State. Three top ten wins. Penn State had two top ten wins, lost by 3 to 8-4 Pittsburgh and lost by 39 points to Michigan. They weren't close enough for a tiebreaker to matter, even after the conference title game.

 

[euphemia]

So, basically, it was a subjective system based on conference commitment that has been made more subjective because a committee arbitrarily decides who the want to play in a given game and somehow prove one team is the best by some secret standard? Last year the committee specifically said because TCU did not play in a conference that had a championship game, they would not be considered for the playoff. There was nothing in the rules that said a conference winner was not eligible without a conference championship game. To then turn around and say Ohio State gets to play for a national championship even though they weren't eligible to play for their conference title is inconsistent. Conferences are not always the same. Some are stronger in some years than others, but a champion still needs to beat the other teams they play. Ohio State did not do that. They are a good team, but they did not win when it counted. They should be seen in the postseason, but they should not play for a national title. If we are going to go by who wins on a week when some team is considered better or worse than they will be four games later, then why bother with conferences at all?

 

[oyarde]

In basketball this evening Notre Dame is up on the Mastodons by about a dozen with about 5 minutes to play , Arizona is up on the Anteaters by 6 with 6 minutes to Half and Duke over Florida @ Half by 10.

 

[oyarde]

Florida Atlantic knocks off Ohio State by 2 .

 

[euphemia]

You know, we could have a separate basketball thread. That would be awesome. I love basketball. Mostly ACC.

 

[CPUd]

Heisman Trophy finalists announced
Joe Boozell | NCAA.com
Last Updated - Dec 5, 2016 22:13 EST
Contact | Archive | RSS

After a season full of impressive performances, we finally have the list of Heisman Trophy finalists that are headed to New York. They are:

QB Lamar Jackson, Louisville

Jackson looked like he was running away with the award in the middle of the season, but the field has since narrowed the gap. Regardless, it’s not surprising to see that Jackson’s been named a finalist.

It’s been a record-setting year for the Louisville sophomore. Jackson has thrown for 3,390 yards and 30 touchdowns in 2016, but he’s been most impressive on the ground. The best dual threat in the nation rushed for an astounding 1,538 yards and 21 scores on the year; he’s topped the 100-yard threshold eight times. Jackson burst onto the scene by posting more than 600 yards of total offense in Week 2 against Syracuse, and he’s turned in gem after gem ever since.


QB Deshaun Watson, Clemson

Watson was a popular pick to win the Heisman in the preseason, and he’s the best player on the No. 2 seed in the College Football Playoff. His case is obvious.

With that said, while Watson has been excellent statistically, his numbers aren’t quite as good as they were in 2015. Regardless, he’s passed for almost 4,000 yards and 37 scores, and the Tigers have all of one loss.

The Tiger QB isn’t running as much as he did last season, and that could wind up hurting his candidacy. He hasn’t rushed for more than 100 yards in a game this season, though his speed and smarts are still evident – Watson ran for 85 yards and two scores in the ACC title game. One of the biggest stars in the game on and off the field, Watson would certainly be deserving of the award.


QB Baker Mayfield, Oklahoma

Mayfield wasn’t selected as a Heisman finalist last season, and he came back with something to prove in 2016. He’s been magnificent all season long, and the Sooner QB is headed to New York because of it.

Mayfield’s per-pass numbers are absurd. The junior is averaging 11.12 yards per attempt on the season, and he owns a sparkling touchdown:interception ratio of 38:8. Mayfield has been particularly strong in the second half of the season; in the past seven weeks, he’s racked up 26 passing touchdowns. That’s a good season for most signal callers. It’s only a sliver of Mayfield’s fantastic campaign.


WR Dede Westbrook, Oklahoma

Starting with a 158-yard performance on Oct. 1 against TCU, Westbrook was unstoppable for the better part of 2016. His numbers on the season: 74 receptions, 1,456 yards and 16 touchdowns. The senior wideout almost averaged 20 yards per reception; there was no deep threat like Westbrook this year in college football.

Westbrook is the only wide receiver that will have a chance to win the Heisman, and that shows how great of an impact he made from his position. The last wide receiver to win the award was Desmond Howard in 1991.


LB/DB Jabrill Peppers, Michigan

Peppers being named a finalist is something of a surprise, but perhaps no player in America impacted the game in as many ways as the stud Michigan defender did this season.

Name a position, and Peppers probably played it. And excelled in doing so. He was all over the field as a linebacker and a defensive back, but also made waves as a running back and Wildcat quarterback. Jim Harbaugh wasn’t afraid to use Peppers in goal line situations on offense, and he delivered: No. 5 in maize and blue ran for 167 yards and three scores on the year. He also returned a punt for a touchdown and was excellent in the return game as a whole.

http://www.ncaa.com/news/football/article/2016-12-05/heisman-trophy-finalists-announced

 

[oyarde]

http://www.ncaa.com/news/football/article/2016-12-05/heisman-trophy-finalists-announced

Just about gotta be one of those first three .

 

[The Gold Standard]

So, basically, it was a subjective system based on conference commitment that has been made more subjective because a committee arbitrarily decides who the want to play in a given game and somehow prove one team is the best by some secret standard? Last year the committee specifically said because TCU did not play in a conference that had a championship game, they would not be considered for the playoff. There was nothing in the rules that said a conference winner was not eligible without a conference championship game. To then turn around and say Ohio State gets to play for a national championship even though they weren't eligible to play for their conference title is inconsistent. Conferences are not always the same. Some are stronger in some years than others, but a champion still needs to beat the other teams they play. Ohio State did not do that. They are a good team, but they did not win when it counted. They should be seen in the postseason, but they should not play for a national title. If we are going to go by who wins on a week when some team is considered better or worse than they will be four games later, then why bother with conferences at all?

Yes, it's subjective. It's always been, and in college football, always will be subjective who gets picked to play for the national championship.

They never said TCU (or Baylor who also finished ahead of TCU that year) didn't make it because they didn't play in a conference championship game. They said the 13th game, or "13th data point", helped Ohio State. It gave them a chance to post an extra impressive win against a good team which gave Ohio State the edge when comparing the three teams.

Penn State beat Ohio State, Michigan beat Penn State. Ohio State beat Michigan. If Michigan had beaten Iowa, there would have been a three-way tie in their division that would have sent Ohio State to the Big Ten championship game. So because Iowa beat Michigan, that means Ohio State should be disqualified from the playoff? Because Clemson lost to Pittsburgh instead of Louisville, they should be in? Conference championship games are a cash grab, exhibition game. Teams in the same conference don't play the same teams. The playoff was never designed to have them be a play-in game.

Ohio State didn't need the 13th data point. They accomplished enough in 12 games to earn a spot. No other team in the country beat three teams that finished ranked in the top ten. Every other team that was in consideration (except Alabama) lost to lesser teams than Ohio State did. But yes, the whole thing was always meant to be subjective.

 

[NorthCarolinaLiberty]

Last year they left TCU out....How does that work, exactly?

TCU has the word Christian in their name.

 

[Zippyjuan]

Very sad. He was an amazing guy. Suicide- found in a park with a gun next to him. http://www.espn.com/college-footbal...ophy-winning-running-back-rashaan-salaam-died

Rashaan Salaam, former Heisman Trophy-winning running back, dies

Rashaan Salaam, who won the Heisman Trophy in 1994, has died, a family spokesperson said Tuesday.

He was 42.

Salaam's body was found in a parking lot at Eben G. Fine Park and 911 was called just before 9 p.m. on Monday, according to Boulder Police spokesperson Shannon Cordingly. The park is less than two miles from Folsom Field, where Salaam starred as a running back for the University of Colorado.

Cordingly said there were no signs of foul play and an autopsy to determine the cause of death will be performed by the Boulder County Coroner's Office. Police told Salaam's mother, Khalada, they suspect suicide after finding a note. She told USA Today Sports, "They said they found a note and would share that with us when we get there."

"The Buff Family has lost an outstanding young man and a great Buff today," Colorado athletic director Rick George said Tuesday. "We are heartbroken for Rashaan and his family, and our thoughts and prayers are with them at this very difficult time."

The Chicago Bears, who picked Salaam in the first round (No. 21 overall) of the 1995 draft, tweeted, "Our thoughts are with his family."

Denver Broncos director of player personnel Matt Russell, who was Salaam's teammate at Colorado from 1992 to '94, released this statement:

"Rashaan was as dynamic off the field as he was on the field as a player. He was a fiercely loyal friend, someone who was always in your corner and had your back. He was the ultimate teammate and supportive of everyone in his locker room. If there was ever a guy who was going to get a personal foul for protecting someone on his team, Rashaan was that guy."

"Rashaan was the ultimate Buffalo and was so proud to be called a 'Colorado Buffalo.' We were part of the same recruiting class, what we called 'nine deuce,' the Class of 1992. On the field, Rashaan was the definition of a winner. It was important to him. He practiced hard, he played hard and he made our teams better. Rashaan and I laughed a lot after practices because we had so many battles and fights. Even when we last saw each other a few years ago at the CU Hall of Fame induction, we still shared those great memories and had a lot of laughs from our time together at Colorado.

"My heart goes out to Rashaan's mother and his family. They have a lot to be proud of with the person that Rashaan was, the way he treated people and the friend he was to everyone he came across. He will be missed by so many, and I extend my deepest sympathies to Rashaan's many friends and family."

Salaam won the Heisman Trophy in 1994, a season in which the Buffaloes finished No. 3 in the final Associated Press poll. He rushed for 2,055 and 24 touchdowns that season and also won the Walter Camp and Doak Walker awards.

During his rookie season, he became the youngest player in NFL history to rush for 1,000 yards. He was 21 years, 77 days old. He rushed for 1,074 and 10 touchdowns that season.

Salaam was plagued by injuries and fumbles (he lost 14 in 31 games for the Bears). He acknowledged in 1999 that marijuana use contributed to his problems in Chicago. "It probably had me out there lackadaisical instead of going out there 100 percent," he told ESPN in an interview then.

"Everybody thinks getting high is cool, you can let it go when you want to let it go," he said. "But it's just as potent as cocaine."

Salaam broke his leg in the third game of the 1997 season, after committing two costly fumbles, and said that injury increased his addiction.

Wondering if it may be related to football injuries- either concussions or injury related pain reliever addictions?