dannno
Member
- Joined
- Dec 19, 2007
- Messages
- 65,717
Seinfeld was one of the greatest comedy shows of all time.
If not the greatest comedy show of all time..
Seinfeld was one of the greatest comedy shows of all time.
It was just people yelling at each other. There were some good jokes, and some good episodes. But after I realized that they're all just bitching all the time, it lost all appeal. I can't watch anyone on the show and say that they're a sympathetic character, yet they're presented as being sympathetic.
If not the greatest comedy show of all time..
If not the greatest comedy show of all time..
Meh. Not even close, IMO. Shows with good, solid absurdist sensibilities are much more enjoyable.
I'll take the likes of The Drew Carey Show, Malcolm in the Middle, or Scrubs over Seinfeld any day.
Why do people keep saying this? It was a pretty good show, but what makes it so much more special than all the others? I watch it and it seems like a pretty normal show to me.
IMO, nah. The Festivus episode and a few others. There are good scenes in a lot of the others, but they certainly aren't classics.I guess watch more.. There are like 120 or 140 episodes or something and many are just huge classics.
I don't know if you watched enough of the show, Seinfeld is about as absurd as it gets.
Did you ever see the series finale? They all went and visited a small town and ended up in prison after failing to help a person in distress and several character witnesses came to testify against them all... like some sort of ultimate kramer, I mean karma..
I don't know if you watched enough of the show, Seinfeld is about as absurd as it gets. Admittedly I stopped watching Malcolm after season 1 or 2 and thought it was pretty good, but I will say I did not like the Drew Carrey show at all.. For that kind of show I think I preferred something like News Radio.
Yeah, I saw it, and abhorred it.
1st - failing to help is not a crime, generally.
2nd - it tried to list all these bad things in a way that was supposed to absolve them to the viewer while indict them to the judge. As a storytelling device, it failed.
3rd - that's not how character witnesses work in real courts.
There was just too much for me to overcome to actually suspend disbelief/immerse myself in the story. Add to that the fact that I'd already written off the series as "anger masquerading as funny" - and the finale was just horrible.
Big Bang Theory is like the new Seinfeld...
George finds a woman (Susan) who is kind of pretty and he doesn't really love her but he doesn't think he can do any better and her parents are rich so he decides to continue the relationship and get engaged and eventually he is responsible for her death - because he bought cheap wedding invitations and he didn't help her send them out so she ended up licking all of them and was poisoned by the cheap glue. That is absurd, ironic and funny.
I saw that one. I didn't think it was any of those things. I just thought it was pathetic.
Okay, I guess it was ironic, too. But it was a pedestrian & uninspired sort of irony.
We apparently have very different notions of what is absurd. Monty Python is absurd. Seinfeld is not absurd. (It perhaps skirts the suburbs of absurdity with some of the Kramer stuff, but it would more accurate to call that stuff "odd" or "strange" - which is not the same thing.)
List of SOME of the classic Seinfeld episodes (in order of appearance):
"The Contest" (If you haven't seen "The Contest" then you haven't seen Seinfeld.. Jerry, Elaine, George and Kramer make a bet to see who can go the longest without masturbating)
George finds a woman (Susan) who is kind of pretty and he doesn't really love her but he doesn't think he can do any better and her parents are rich so he decides to continue the relationship and get engaged and eventually he is responsible for her death - because he bought cheap wedding invitations and he didn't help her send them out so she ended up licking all of them and was poisoned by the cheap glue. That is absurd, ironic and funny.