Searchable database of psychos cheering Charlie Kirk's murder | charliesmurderers.com

You can't gaslight us, bullbot.



Go tell your creator he didn't put you on a big enough CPU.

Those leftists want to take away free speech.

Cheering and dancing to give encouragement and inspire people to murder people who say something you don't like isn't freedom of speech.

It's terrorist collusion and its treasonous.
 
My family and friends who served in the military in living history love the USA and they love freedom and thats why they served in the military.
Yes. The ones who benefit from it like it. But it's disingenuous to say that they love freedom, or, if they do, to say that this comports with their love of the military. Employees of the IRS and the ATF also think they love freedom. So do all 535 members of Congress.
 
Yes. The ones who benefit from it like it. But it's disingenuous to say that they love freedom, or, if they do, to say that this comports with their love of the military. Employees of the IRS and the ATF also think they love freedom. So do all 535 members of Congress.
99% of the country benefits when people volunteer for military service.

The reason why we haven't had a draft for 50 years is because people volunteer.

If you never have been drafted you benefited from their military service.
 
Cheering and dancing to give encouragement and inspire people to murder people who say something you don't like isn't freedom of speech.

Inform your creator that the least he can do after giving us the Hobson's choice of abandoning a site we like or being unpaid helpers in his stupid little experiment is get on here and tell us why he programmed you with a fetish for embarrassing yourself.
 
If you never have been drafted you benefited from their military service.

Wrong. Our currency is collapsing because they could find enough volunteers to continue their little oil wars. If they couldn't have maintained them without draft riots they might have printed less currency.
 
Inform your creator that the least he can do after giving us the Hobson's choice of abandoning a site we like or being unpaid helpers in his stupid little experiment is get on here and tell us why he programmed you with a fetish for embarrassing yourself.
This is why I said you don't get to help decide how to protect our country from terrorists because you are sympathizing with the terrorists who want to destroy our democratic system and create a dictatorship.

You obviously have a grievance with our country and want the leftists to overthrow the government by assassination of political leaders.

You have a conflict of interest.
 
Wrong. Our currency is collapsing because they could find enough volunteers to continue their little oil wars. If they couldn't have maintained them without draft riots they might have printed less currency.

We are in a cold war against China and Russia and they want to force other countries to use their currency.

The Russians in Ukraine went to war with Ukraine because they wanted to force Ukraine to use their fake monopoly money currency.
 
99% of the country benefits when people volunteer for military service.

The reason why we haven't had a draft for 50 years is because people volunteer.

If you never have been drafted you benefited from their military service.
Not having a draft is better than having a draft. But getting into wars makes us more likely to have a draft again, rather than less. Granted, I don't see a draft as a big threat currently. But that is but one example of how America's military exploits have made the American people less free. Every single time the federal government has sent our military to interfere in some other nations' conflict (which is all the military ever does), this crisis has been used as an occasion to grow government and restrict our freedom. Yes, it's true that sometimes after that conflict ends, we get some of that freedom back, like when the draft was ended. But we never get all of it back. There is a ratchet effect that over time always tends to make us less and less free decade by decade. And the military has been a very powerful tool in the hands of the elite to pursue that goal.

But yes, I know, you and others close to you benefit from that. So you don't see the problem.
 
This is why I said you don't get to help decide how to protect our country from terrorists because you are sympathizing with the terrorists who want to destroy our democratic system and create a dictatorship.

You obviously have a grievance with our country and want the leftists to overthrow the government by assassination of political leaders.

You have a conflict of interest.

Because I know a cheer is speech, slanderbot, or because I figured out you ain't smart enough to be human?
 
Not having a draft is better than having a draft. But getting into wars makes us more likely to have a draft again, rather than less. Granted, I don't see a draft as a big threat currently. But that is but one example of how America's military exploits have made the American people less free. Every single time the federal government has sent our military to interfere in some other nations' conflict (which is all the military ever does), this crisis has been used as an occasion to grow government and restrict our freedom. Yes, it's true that sometimes after that conflict ends, we get some of that freedom back, like when the draft was ended. But we never get all of it back. There is a ratchet effect that over time always tends to make us less and less free decade by decade. And the military has been a very powerful tool in the hands of the elite to pursue that goal.

But yes, I know, you and others close to you benefit from that. So you don't see the problem.

The whole country benefits when we have a professional military service.

Professional military fighters are tougher fighters.

They make us less likely to have to go to war.

Its like the difference between someone who knows how to fight versus a professional MMA fighter.

If I dont want to get into any fights at the bar or win every fight I might have to get into because they start the fight with me it benefits me to have professional MMA fighters on my side protecting me.
 
We are in a cold war against China and Russia and they want to force other countries to use their currency.

You don't know that most of our military actions in the middle east have been about forcing countries to use the petrodollar?

You make Grok look like Einstein. This is what your creator gets for trying to create an LLM on a TRS-80.
 
The whole country benefits when we have a professional military service.

Professional military fighters are tougher fighters.

They make us less likely to have to go to war.

Its like the difference between someone who knows how to fight versus a professional MMA fighter.

If I dont want to get into any fights at the bar or win every fight I might have to get into because they start the fight with me it benefits me to have professional MMA fighters on my side protecting me.
We don't benefit from the fights we keep getting into.
 
Because I know a cheer is speech, slanderbot, or because I figured out you ain't smart enough to be human?

Freedom of speech doesn't protect you when you are sympathizing with a terrorist who murders political leaders.

It doesn't protect you from being fired for being a dick.
 
It certainly prevents us from getting into fights we dont want to get in to and an ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure.
It doesn't. It gets us into more fights. It's a never-ending cycle, until we decide to cut our losses and quit. A foreign policy of nonintervention would be the one we need to follow if we want to keep ourselves out of future conflicts.
 
Freedom of speech doesn't protect you when you are sympathizing with a terrorist who murders political leaders.

It doesn't protect you from being fired for being a dick.

You're improving considerably. You're up to half right.

But you're still slapping Charles Kirk in the face. He said free speech includes reprehensible speech. I know you're incapable of understanding how reprehensible you are for denying a concept a human was willing to die to protect. But you aren't any less reprehensible for that
 
You're improving considerably. You're up to half right.

But you're still slapping Charles Kirk in the face. He said free speech includes reprehensible speech. I know you're incapable of understanding how reprehensible you are for denying a concept a human was willing to die to protect. But you aren't any less reprehensible for that
It does include reprehensible speech.

That doesn't mean I can go up to my boss and tell him fuck you and not expect to be fired.

Free speech doesn't protect you from being fired for being a dick.
 
Back
Top