Sean Haugh for US Senate - video production by ladyjade3!

[ladyjade3]

Very proud of this video. Its the first thing out of my new studio with a decent camera, good lights, good sound, etc.

Sean's running in North Carolina for US Senate and we're going to have lots of fun with this, but still discuss some serious issues. The plan is to put out short videos of Sean ranting pretty regularly.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mr0G233lO4s&feature=youtu.be

 

[William Tell]

What's wrong with Greg Brannon? He's the next Ron Paul.

 

[ladyjade3]

Greg Brannon's campaign made it very clear they don't want my help. So I am helping Sean.

And no, Greg Brannon is NOT the next Ron Paul. And I will leave it at that.

 

[William Tell]

Greg Brannon's campaign made it very clear they don't want my help. So I am helping Sean.

And no, Greg Brannon is NOT the next Ron Paul. And I will leave it at that.

Well, I got that from a fundraising email from Ron Paul, I tend to consider him the expert

"...But there are many other races out there where you and I could make a difference, including:
.
>>> North Carolina where Dr. Greg Brannon -- who has been called “the next Ron Paul” -- is surging to the top of his Republican Primary field and appears ready to take on Democrat incumbent Kay Hagan;.... For Liberty,
Ron Paul"

"

 

[ladyjade3]

I bet you I've spent more time with Brannon face to face than Ron Paul has. And was this before or after he was found liable for fraud?

 

[MichaelDavis]

Very proud of this video. Its the first thing out of my new studio with a decent camera, good lights, good sound, etc.

Sean's running in North Carolina for US Senate and we're going to have lots of fun with this, but still discuss some serious issues. The plan is to put out short videos of Sean ranting pretty regularly.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mr0G233lO4s&feature=youtu.be

Ew, Libertarian Party. All we need now is someone to spoil a Greg Brannon victory. Hopefully he suffers the same fate as Charlie Earl so we don't get a Robert Sarvis 2.0.

 

[ladyjade3]

Brannon is going to get his clock cleaned with or without Sean's help, I hate to break it to you.

 

[MichaelDavis]

Brannon is going to get his clock cleaned with or without Sean's help, I hate to break it to you.

Polls show Brannon tied with Tillis in the primary and leading Hagan in the general election. You obviously have no idea what you're talking about.

 

[ladyjade3]

Not all of them. We'll see.

 

[ladyjade3]

http://www.newsobserver.com/2014/03...-kay-hagan-keeps-attacks.html?sp=/99/102/105/

"But Hagan’s unilateral focus on Tillis – one of eight candidates – is interesting. A telling line from the story: “Hagan said she’d leave it to Republicans to decide her challenger but voluntarily critiqued Tillis at nearly every turn in a wide-ranging interview.”

Obviously Hagan can read a poll; Tillis leads in most of them. But as she attacks Tillis, how much of it helps Greg Brannon, a tea party candidate with views further outside the state’s center of political thought? Democrats would surely salivate for a Hagan-Brannon matchup in November, but it remains unclear if Brannon can bust his 15 percent ceiling in the race."

I mean, if you all want to be selective in what polls you read, that's fine, but I've been through enough heartbreak on election day to know better.

That's why I'm not going to cry over this. I'm going to have fun and do something positive.

 

[compromise]

Greg Brannon is a far superior candidate in all aspects to McLovin.

 

[TaftFan]

Have we found a good challenger for Amash yet?

 

[MichaelDavis]

http://www.newsobserver.com/2014/03...-kay-hagan-keeps-attacks.html?sp=/99/102/105/

"But Hagan’s unilateral focus on Tillis – one of eight candidates – is interesting. A telling line from the story: “Hagan said she’d leave it to Republicans to decide her challenger but voluntarily critiqued Tillis at nearly every turn in a wide-ranging interview.”

Obviously Hagan can read a poll; Tillis leads in most of them. But as she attacks Tillis, how much of it helps Greg Brannon, a tea party candidate with views further outside the state’s center of political thought? Democrats would surely salivate for a Hagan-Brannon matchup in November, but it remains unclear if Brannon can bust his 15 percent ceiling in the race."

I mean, if you all want to be selective in what polls you read, that's fine, but I've been through enough heartbreak on election day to know better.

That's why I'm not going to cry over this. I'm going to have fun and do something positive.

So because you don't think Brannon can win, you're supporting a Libertarian Party looser? Tell me, when was the last time the Libertarian Party won a congressional election? The answer: never. You really need to get your priorities straitened out.

 

[Tywysog Cymru]

Brannon is purer than Rand Paul, and I'm not one of the anti-Rand people here. We might as well get Gary Johnson to run against Rand for the White House in 2016.

 

[TheTyke]

I used to have sympathy for 3rd parties... but after seeing them run against Mike Lee, Justin Amash and now Brannon, that has disappeared. The one useful thing they could do strategically is sink any statists who were nominated, and send a clear message that only if we nominate libertarian-leaning candidates will we win.

They are doing the exact opposite... running candidates against most liberty-oriented nominees we've seen in a long time, and spending much of their time explaining that they didn't actually throw the elections. All with no real plan for winning any seats.

I'm baffled.

 

[jurgs01]

I used to have sympathy for 3rd parties... but after seeing them run against Mike Lee, Justin Amash and now Brannon, that has disappeared. The one useful thing they could do strategically is sink any statists who were nominated, and send a clear message that only if we nominate libertarian-leaning candidates will we win.

They are doing the exact opposite... running candidates against most liberty-oriented nominees we've seen in a long time, and spending much of their time explaining that they didn't actually throw the elections. All with no real plan for winning any seats.

I'm baffled.

They have every right to run in any election. It's not like that guy is going to pose any threat to Brannon in the primary (he's not in the mix until the general). Also, if you watched the video I can't imagine should Brannon win the primary that he will get many votes (didn't seem very eloquent or coherent in the video).

 

[specsaregood]

The plan is to put out short videos of Sean ranting pretty regularly.

I was just saying the other day that there was a distinct lack of people ranting on youtube.

 

[ladyjade3]

So because you don't think Brannon can win, you're supporting a Libertarian Party looser? Tell me, when was the last time the Libertarian Party won a congressional election? The answer: never. You really need to get your priorities straitened out.

I guess I could go work on Tillis's campaign... see how he feels about my 5 years Capitol Hill experience beside Ron Paul... Remember, Brannon has turned down my help for reasons I don't understand.

 

[TaftFan]

I guess I could go work on Tillis's campaign... see how he feels about my 5 years Capitol Hill experience beside Ron Paul... Remember, Brannon has turned down my help for reasons I don't understand.

I think I am beginning to understand.

 

[invisible]

Hopefully you're at least actually getting paid for your efforts this time around. If you're not going to be working for a Republican, the least they can do is to make it worth your while.