Sean Hannity just said he's a libertarian.

This is totally irrelevant, but this makes me increasingly skepticle of Beck.

Is FOX trying to harness some of the energy from the Libertarian movement? I think most of us are too smart for that trick, but Beck has definitely got some of us under his spell. Lets not forget that Beck was a neo-con not long ago and still is when it comes to foreign policy.

Is Hannity pulling a Beck? or just being an idiot as usual, haha

Im definitely reading way too much into this.
 
Disgusting.....I'm having trouble uttering the words cuz I just vomited on my vocal chords.
 
Hannity a libertarian.. Wow. That must mean I'm a fucking neocon.
 
maybe he realizing we are right.

Newt used to be a Libertarian (tax cuts, nearly abolishing selective service etc).

The House Republicans ALL voted against the bailout.

it is possible Hannity has these same Goldwater roots and that the Republican party will return to its natural base. it surely can't survive as a Southern Religious party.
 
cindy25 said:
maybe he realizing we are right.

Newt used to be a Libertarian (tax cuts, nearly abolishing selective service etc).

The House Republicans ALL voted against the bailout.

it is possible Hannity has these same Goldwater roots and that the Republican party will return to its natural base. it surely can't survive as a Southern Religious party.
Click to expand...

I'm sorry did I read right? Goldwater? Hannity with Goldwater roots?

Maybe the confusion you have is with hannity himself? Don't forget that hannity was for Iraq for the same reason he was against Clinton's war in Yugoslavia/Kosovo.

The only similarity he has with Goldwater is that they are part of the Republican party. Hannity has NO issues with reckless government spending as long as it is the republicans doing it.
 
Just the same old crap they pulled back when Clinton was in office. The Republicrats ran on a small government, non-interventionist, no nation building platform. Go back and look at how most of the Republicrats still in office voted against Somalia and Bosnia have voted for Iraq and the War on Terror. Go back and see who voted against Clinton's big government policies at home only to support it once they got into power.

It would be just as pathetic to fall for this charade as the Democrats are for falling for Obama after being duped by Clinton. Actually, it would be more pathetic given the last eight years that saw government increase to levels that would make Karl Marx blush. Now, we're supposed to believe that they all changed their big government, war-mongering principles because they have seen the light? Oh, and they just happen to be the Party NOT in power right now.:rolleyes:
 
cindy25 said:
maybe he realizing we are right.

Newt used to be a Libertarian (tax cuts, nearly abolishing selective service etc).

The House Republicans ALL voted against the bailout. **(Not the first one) ;)**

it is possible Hannity has these same Goldwater roots and that the Republican party will return to its natural base. it surely can't survive as a Southern Religious party.
Click to expand...

1241.gif
 
Last edited:
The first Libertarian to earn a living by spewing false and toxic propaganda for fascist bankers, corporatists, and foot soldier politicians in exchange for a paycheck from collusive non-free market cartels that want to enslave humanity and co-opt militaries for strategic resource plundering and social terrorizing. Quite a feat.
 
cindy25 said:
maybe he realizing we are right.

Newt used to be a Libertarian (tax cuts, nearly abolishing selective service etc).

The House Republicans ALL voted against the bailout.

it is possible Hannity has these same Goldwater roots and that the Republican party will return to its natural base. it surely can't survive as a Southern Religious party.
Click to expand...

I think the correct response here is that 1/5 people in this nation leans libertarian (small L) without knowing it. Some of these public figures are realizing that they are at least in part libertarian. That is likely to me. But are these public figures really 100% libertarians? not by a long shot. That is how they will dirty the clean water.
 
american.swan said:
I think the correct response here is that 1/5 people in this nation leans libertarian (small L) without knowing it. Some of these public figures are realizing that they are at least in part libertarian. That is likely to me. But are these public figures really 100% libertarians? not by a long shot. That is how they will dirty the clean water.
Click to expand...

IF you SUPPORT WAR you are NOT a LIBERTARIAN.

There are differentiations in libertarianism etc, as to what is deemed fraudulent (FRB), voluntarism (Voluntary slavery) etc etc. all small minor issues; but they ALL adhere to non aggression axiom + private property rights.

They just differ on what is aggression etc.

Supporting WAR: VIOLATES - the non aggression axiom and private property rights. It is socialist in nature. A big government program.

And it does so openly, no doubt about it.

He's an objectivist or neocon or whatever. Definitely not a libertarian by a LONG shot.

They may support some market freedom, but definitely NOT free market.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

PAF
No, Vivek Ramaswamy, a Libertarian-Nationalist Alliance Doesn't Make Sense
Replies
6
Views
492
familydog
F
PAF
The IRS Isn’t Going Away, and This is How We Know
2
Replies
38
Views
273
TheTexan
TheTexan
Occam's Banana
Rand Paul's airing of grievances #Festivus2023
Replies
3
Views
3K
acptulsa
acptulsa
Brian4Liberty
Portland woman knocked out by attacker blames city for slow police response
Replies
4
Views
225
unknown
unknown
jmdrake
The shooting of Davis Moturi
Replies
5
Views
744
TheTexan
TheTexan
Back
Top