SCOTUS saves Obamacare in 6-25-15 opinion

[donnay]

Not surprised at all by this decision. Roberts is in their pocket.

 

[Created4]

Not surprised at all by this decision. Roberts is in their pocket.

That's what I was thinking too. There has to be a crony connection somewhere, either to the insurance industry or the pharmaceutical industry. Otherwise this does not make much sense....

 

[AuH20]

Can't say I disagree with this. It's practically out in the open now. All mounting evidence points to this unfortunate conclusion.

This just proves that the entire government of the US-- ALL BRANCHES--- have committed treason against the US by allowing an ineligible non natural born Citizen, Hussein Obama, to infiltrate the WH, and bring with him the New World Order Puppeteers, enslaving us all, and removing US Citizen sovereignty.

Roberts is a criminal, and has been blackmailed into approving anything that the NWO and the ineligible puppet want to pass (he has illegally adopted chidren, and is likely homosexual). He flubbed the Presidential Oath in 2009 on purpose, then never even administered it in public in 2013.

You all need to wake up and understand what has transpired. There IS NO UNITED STATES. It has been Usurped by an ineligible executor of the laws. Thus the Constitution does not exist, and the law is only what evil and corrupt men/ women say it is.

Hussein Obama was born a British subject, and is likely still a British subject, under the yoke of the British Rothchild Banker control. We have been repatriated.

Only a new Revolution and hanging of the government conspirators who have committed treason-- including the Usurper, will restore the Republic.

 

[wizardwatson]

Can't say I disagree with us. It's practically out in the open now.

You all need to wake up and understand what has transpired. There IS NO UNITED STATES. It has been Usurped by an ineligible executor of the laws. Thus the Constitution does not exist, and the law is only what evil and corrupt men/ women say it is.

Well, there's still marriage in some states. That's really the legal nexus of civilization itself. Constitutional bans are currently in place legally and being enforced.

Once that shoe drops I will officially agree that she's dead. She's a brain dead vegetable for sure, but once gay marriage comes out, that's when the heart stops.

That will be tomorrow, or by latest monday.

Then there is officially no moral standard for anything.

 

[Created4]

he has illegally adopted chidren...

Any references to this anywhere??

 

[AuH20]

Any references to this anywhere??

Here:


http://www.westernjournalism.com/john-roberts-likely-protecting-obamacare/

In 2005, when they thought they were doing the Democrats’ bidding, the New York Times dug into apparently easily accessible records and found that the children Roberts and his wife adopted in “South America” started life as Irish citizens. This is a red flag. The laws of Ireland regarding adoptions are very clear: adoptions by non-citizens are prohibited, as are private adoptions.

 

[ZENemy]

Death by 1000 cuts.

 

[juleswin]

Can't say I disagree with this. It's practically out in the open now. All mounting evidence points to this unfortunate conclusion.

My problem with posts like this is that it gives the false believe that somehow things would have been better if the alternative was elected i.e. all this wouldn't have happened had we elected a non British born subject. You cant all believe that somehow this is something that is being done to the US rather than just some people in the US selling out for money and power.

The US is a top of the food chain, nobody is doing anything to the US, rather the US is doing it all to itself. Half the country right now is cheering and popping champagne because of this decision. Heck, I wouldn't be surprised if a good number or republicans are cheering along.

 

[AuH20]

My problem with posts like this is that it gives the false believe that somehow things would have been better if the alternative was elected i.e. all this wouldn't have happened had we elected a non British born subject. You cant all believe that somehow this is something that is being done to the US rather than just some people in the US selling out for money and power.

The US is a top of the food chain, nobody is doing anything to the US, rather the US is doing it all to itself. Half the country right now is cheering and popping champagne because of this decision. Heck, I wouldn't be surprised if a good number or republicans are cheering along.

A fair ruling would have given us false hope that a political solution exists. There is no political solution.

 

[AuH20]

I wonder if this ruling will push Mark Levin over the edge. He's been creeping there. He even went as far as to say that we are in a 'soft tyranny' stage. Maybe he can talk to Thomas Woods after their verbal spat a few years ago.

 

[Carlybee]

My problem with posts like this is that it gives the false believe that somehow things would have been better if the alternative was elected i.e. all this wouldn't have happened had we elected a non British born subject. You cant all believe that somehow this is something that is being done to the US rather than just some people in the US selling out for money and power.

The US is a top of the food chain, nobody is doing anything to the US, rather the US is doing it all to itself. Half the country right now is cheering and popping champagne because of this decision. Heck, I wouldn't be surprised if a good number or republicans are cheering along.

Of course they are...it's their health plan. They've done nothing to defund it..matter of fact Boner stopped that from going forward.
They get contributions from those who profit from this..why would they poop in their own bed?

 

[Ronin Truth]

I wonder how much that SCOTUS decision cost the Executive Branch?

 

[brushfire]

Calm down everyone... The republicans are going to repeal obamacare - they said so.

 

[Ronin Truth]

Calm down everyone... The republicans are going to repeal obamacare - they said so.

That was BEFORE they got the COTUS majority. Promised events very often change with the times and the circumstances (and the "donations" checks).

 

[Peace&Freedom]

With CSA flag going down, TPP going through, Patriot Act II going through, Obamacare being upheld, gay marriage being upheld, all in the same month... it feels like the game Mortal Kombat when your character is wobbling and the screen says "FINISH HIM!"

How fitting Obama is attending a funeral tomorrow. More than just people died this month.

My metaphor is, we're in the middle of one of the Rambo movies, where the triumphalist establishment figure says "Rambo's done, it's over. He lost." Rambo here stands for liberty, the Constitution and cultural tradition. What we need to do is maintain our Col. Trautman poker face, and while conceding things do look bad, quietly suspect a turnaround will happen.

The last time they told us "Rambo" was done, was after the Sandy Hook shootings, as the cheerful gun control freaks chortled over how many legislative goodies they were going to get from riding that tragedy to victory. Three years later, no victory, since Americans loaded up buying more guns, and the Tea Party and liberty people in Congress beat back the gun control drumbeat. The PC crowd is cheering over the 'bring down the Confederate flag' and 'impose gay marriage acceptance on all' victories now, but will they be laughing after the next elections?

That's the longer time horizon we have to have. The statist and cultural PC forces always presume their winning a battle means they've won the war, when all it actually means is, we're at the end of a round. Then when they get blown out at the last two mid-term elections, they turn to us flustered and say, "you knew, you KNEW Rambo would come back!" That's when we get to have a little victory and reply, "I suspected." The battle continues, but I say, liberty will come back from this.

 

[Ronin Truth]

Death by 1000 cuts.

Except nothing ever really gets cut (or dies).

 

[aGameOfThrones]

 

[ZENemy]

Except nothing ever really gets cut (or dies).

I was referring tot he death of our freedom.

The ACA mandate is literally a tax on living.


I cannot find any proof that it applies to me, a 200 year old piece of parchment signed by dead folks means nothing to me. Defensive violence is next.

 

[Created4]

In 2005, when they thought they were doing the Democrats’ bidding, the New York Times dug into apparently easily accessible records and found that the children Roberts and his wife adopted in “South America” started life as Irish citizens. This is a red flag. The laws of Ireland regarding adoptions are very clear: adoptions by non-citizens are prohibited, as are private adoptions.

Interesting. I found references to a N.Y. Times investigation into this, which was portrayed as a liberal attack against his family, but apparently the N.Y. Times never ran the story?

XXXXX DRUDGE REPORT XXXXX THU AUG 04, 2005 11:35:09 ET XXXXX

NY TIMES INVESTIGATES ADOPTION RECORDS OF SUPREME COURT NOMINEE'S CHILDREN

**Exclusive**

The DRUDGE REPORT has uncovered a plot in the NEW YORK TIMES' newsroom to look into the adoption of the children of Supreme Court Nominee John G. Roberts.

The TIMES has investigative reporter Glen Justice hot on the case to investigate adoption records of Judge Roberts’ two young children, Josie age 5 and Jack age 4, a top source reveals.

Judge Roberts and his wife Jane adopted the children when they each were infants.

Both children were adopted from Latin America.

A TIMES insider claims the look into the adoptions are part of the paper's "standard background check."

From beaufortobserver.net:

Scholars will argue for years about why John Roberts sided with the liberal block on the court. But beyond the legal nuances of his position we suspect that history will record another dimension to his decision—did his personal, private situation impact his decision. Put crudely, was he blackmailed?

How could that have happened? Well, one theory is that he was trying to protect his family. Here’s the story:

The Roberts have two children, both adopted. But the way they adopted them is rather unusual and shrouded in secrecy. In 2005, when he was nominated to the Supreme Court by George W. Bush. A number of Elite Media outlets investigated how the Roberts’ adopted their two children. But for some reason the investigations died by the wayside. But in light of his “peculiar” ruling on ObamaCare those circumstances are being resurrected to connect the dots to see if he was perhaps “influenced” in his legal position by the threat his personal life.

From rightwingwatch.org

Tea Party Nation president Judson Phillips sent members an email this morning entitled: ‘Was Chief Justice John Roberts Blackmailed To Support ObamaCare?’ Obviously, we had to check this out, and lo and behold it links to a tea party message board post about how Chief Justice Roberts changed his decision on the health care reform law after he was “blackmailed” by President Obama as part of an illegal adoption and child trafficking scheme.

It is now quite evident that the two Children were from Ireland. Even wikipedia references these adoptions at the time of Roberts' confirmation, and indicates that the children were of Irish birth.

However Irish law 1) prohibits the adoption of Children to non-residents, and 2) also does not permit private adoptions, but rather has all adoptions go through a public agency.

Evidently Roberts arranged for this adoption through some sort of trafficking agency, that got the children out of Ireland and into that Latin American country, from which they were adopted, thereby circumventing two Irish laws -- entirely illegal, but perhaps quasi-legitimized by the birth mothers (two) transporting the children out of Ireland.

Undoubtedly Roberts and his wife spent a great deal of money for this illegal process, circumventing Irish laws and arranging for the transit of two Irish children from separate birth-mothers to a foreign nation. Come 2012, those two children have been with the Roberts' for roughly 10 years, since they were adopted as "infants".

…

Roberts is not deserving of any sort of respect here, and is only the latest example of people in position believing themselves above the law, beyond scrutiny and exempt from repercussion.

It all now makes sense.

The circumstances of these two adoptions explain not only why this would be overlooked by an overall sympathetic media, but also why a sitting Chief Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court would not want this information to become public fodder well into his tenure. Its release and public discussion would discredit Roberts as an impartial judge of the law, and undoubtedly lead to his impeachment.

This also explains why Roberts would have a means to be blackmailed, and why that leverage would still exist even after the institution of ObamaCare.

 

[r3volution 3.0]

I was only interested in whether they'd rule in such a way as to cripple the ACA, fully expecting that they would not.

So, no surprise here.

...And I have zero interest in the legal opinion, won't be reading it, don't care.

Any opinion beyond "this power is not explicitly vested in Congress in Article 1 Section 8" is going to be pure bullshit, not worth your time.