Scientists Propose Dumping Hundreds of Tons of Iron into Ocean to ‘Stop Global Warming’

Joined
Sep 20, 2011
Messages
13,839
Scientists Propose Dumping Hundreds of Tons of Iron into Ocean to ‘Stop Global Warming’

Scientists Propose Dumping Hundreds of Tons of Iron into Ocean to ‘Stop Global Warming’


Anthony Gucciardi
Infowars.com
July 21, 2012

In an attempt to ‘stop global warming’, scientists have been experimenting with dumping several tons of iron into the Antarctic ocean in order to potentially fertilize the development of plankton. Despite raising a multitude of red flags raised from leading scientific organizations and health watch organizations, a new study is now calling for the practice to be even further extended as a worldwide ‘geoengineering’ strategy to alter the climate via dumping hundreds of tons of iron dust into the ocean. Previous research found that by dumping the heavy metal into oceans worldwide it could not only devastate the marine life population, but deplete oxygen levels and explode the growth of certain unwanted organisms.

The implementation began with a California-based company known as Planktos, a self-described private ‘ecorestoration’ company. While the widescale iron dumping experiment was halted due to lack of funding, some are still calling for the plan to be followed through. Using a 115-foot ship, the company team members aimed to travel over 200 miles west of the Galápagos Islands and ultimately dump a hundred tons of iron dust into international water.



As iron can stimulate plankton growth (organisms which absorb CO2), it has been touted to be a method of artificial engineering the climate with great effectiveness. In fact, one scientist named John Martin said in 1980 that a “half tanker of iron” could cause an ice age. Planktos sought to dump excessive amounts of iron into the ocean, capture carbon, and then sell carbon credits to companies looking to ‘offset’ their global emissions. A mission that ultimately collapsed.

But now Planktos’ CEO Russ George and some ‘environmental scientists’ are back in the saddles and looking to revisit the concept that involves selling off potentially millions (if not billions) of dollars of outlandish carbon credits to major corporations. An operation that while not only risky in regards to what we know might happen, but also what we don’t know that may happen. As detailed in a UNESCO report, it is documented that such tinkering with the ocean’s natural regulation is quite risky. The report states:


“Large-scale fertilization could have unintended (and difficult to predict) impacts not only locally, e.g. risk of toxic algal blooms, but also far removed in space and time. Impact assessments need to include the possibility of such ‘far-field’ effects on biological productivity, sub-surface oxygen levels, biogas production and ocean acidification.”

For now, the plan has no set date or confirmation. If the organizations and individuals backing this plan get their way, however, hundreds of tons of iron may soon be dumped into the earth’s oceans without properly identifying the risks associated with the process.


original article here:
http://www.infowars.com/scientists-...ns-of-iron-into-ocean-to-stop-global-warming/
 
Is iron a pollutant?

Not really. It's a nutrient to all living things basically, including you.
Too much iron is not good, however, there are a lot of natural ways in which excess iron will be taken out of the environment.
Algae are not bad as they are on the bottom of the food chain, in aquariums or aquaponics systems (plants grown on fish waste) Iron is one of the elements that is in short supply the soonest, so this is often added as a supplement to boost plant growth.

For once, I think this is a plan that will cost a truckload of money, but will not have many, if any adverse effects. I don't see why extra algae would be bad. Besides, hundreds of tons ? Will that be enough...? I doubt it. According to the internet, there is some 1.4 billion cubic kilometers of water on earth, most of which is located in the seas. That's a lot of gallons (Don't be confused, all numbers used are metrics!). Anyways, one cubic kilometer of water, weighs in at around 1 billion tons, or a trillion kilograms. Raising iron levels by 1ppm in one cubic meter requires one gram of iron, or a millionth of 1000kg. Raising iron levels in 1 cubic kilometer of water, would therefore take 1 billion grams of iron, a million kilogram or a thousand tons of iron... And that's just for 1 cubic kilometer... Raising iron levels in the entire ocean would therefore take around 1.4 trillion tons of iron, does that make 1.4 quadrillion kilograms ? And that's just 1ppm.

They don't mention by how much they want to raise the levels, do they ? It seems rather futile :P.

Edit: this calculations does take ALL water supplies, including groundwater into regard. So it's not a real accurate number, but it's in the same order of magnitude.
Edit2: the only adverse effect will be skyrocketing iron prices...........
 
Last edited:
If you or I did this we would be in jail...These save the world schemes are a thousand variations on ditch digging and refilling projects. This happens to be the scientific worlds version of it.

The windmills, solar farms etc. etc. are political creations. Which is to say they are crony capitalisim. The business model is simply getting a law passed to funnel tax dollars to these so called "business".
 
Last edited:
Lol, who is coming up with this? Dumping Hundreds of Tons of Iron into Ocean to Stop Global Warming, funny.
 
Not really. It's a nutrient to all living things basically, including you.
Too much iron is not good, however, there are a lot of natural ways in which excess iron will be taken out of the environment.

Too much of anything isn't good, right?

Algae are not bad as they are on the bottom of the food chain, in aquariums or aquaponics systems (plants grown on fish waste) Iron is one of the elements that is in short supply the soonest, so this is often added as a supplement to boost plant growth.

For once, I think this is a plan that will cost a truckload of money, but will not have many, if any adverse effects. I don't see why extra algae would be bad. Besides, hundreds of tons ? Will that be enough...? I doubt it. According to the internet, there is some 1.4 billion cubic kilometers of water on earth, most of which is located in the seas. That's a lot of gallons (Don't be confused, all numbers used are metrics!). Anyways, one cubic kilometer of water, weighs in at around 1 billion tons, or a trillion kilograms. Raising iron levels by 1ppm in one cubic meter requires one gram of iron, or a millionth of 1000kg. Raising iron levels in 1 cubic kilometer of water, would therefore take 1 billion grams of iron, a million kilogram or a thousand tons of iron... And that's just for 1 cubic kilometer... Raising iron levels in the entire ocean would therefore take around 1.4 trillion tons of iron, does that make 1.4 quadrillion kilograms ? And that's just 1ppm.

They don't mention by how much they want to raise the levels, do they ? It seems rather futile :P.

Edit: this calculations does take ALL water supplies, including groundwater into regard. So it's not a real accurate number, but it's in the same order of magnitude.
Edit2: the only adverse effect will be skyrocketing iron prices...........

interesting how Alex Jones suddenly cares about the environment.
 
If you or I did this we would be in jail...These save the world schemes are a thousand variations on ditch digging and refilling projects. This happens to be the scientific worlds version of it.

The windmills, solar farms etc. etc. are political creations. Which is to say they are crony capitalisim. The business model is simply getting a law passed to funnel tax dollars to these so called "business".

No, we wouldn't. Not unless it's a pollutant, such as crude oil.

Windmills and solar farms are political creations? then what are market creations?
 
Last edited:
What global warming? This has nothing to do with climate change, this has to do with carbon tax and how to game the tax credit system.
 
Back
Top