SC Debate - FNC (1/16/12) 9pm ET - Official Thread

Hopefully Ron further establishes himself as the anti-Romney candidate.

Him and Romney are the only ones who have finished in the top tier in both early states, and it's looking likely that that extend to SC too with Santorum crashing.
 
i just thought of starting this thread, but you beat me to it. My question is this: considering how bad FAUX hates RP, how many of you are going to watch. Brett Baier is decently fair, but his handlers do make him pop the dumb off the wall questions to RP.

radio heads are already talking how important this debate is and I just fell like with Fox moderating we are starting a step behind. Im sure Ron will do ok, but lets hope attack dog frothy and old grumpy man Noot go full court press against Obamney


Ron needs to attack Romney too IMO and ignore the others. Romney doesnt counter argue well and wont bring out the cynical language like the others on Iran and foreign policy

I do wonder though if there will be a larger (than say the past 2 or 3 debates) time speaking differential for RP. another 90 second night? lets hope not...
\
 
Can't wait. Can't wait for RP to rip apart Santorum on Iran once again.
 
Warrior_of_Freedom said:
Oh great, Fox News--I can't wait. Doesn't c-span host any debates?
Click to expand...

Yea, damn C-SPAN would be awesome with debates, one of the last of the good-guy networks around.

Well, it's no secret this debate is going to be huge. With the momentum we have now, Ron needs to really come up with something hard hitting and get fired up a bit. These are going to be highly critical coming into primary day. He has to do something (and the time BEFORE the debate) to reach out to evangelicals. Newt has 40% of them, ffs, according to that ARG poll. :rolleyes: He needs to syphon them away from Newt by talking about his own faith, and bring up them awesome talking points he brought up some months back about biblical law and it relates to money, government, etc, in a speech he gave. Youtube the Value Voters speech he gave this year, was fantastic what he said in that speech. He doesn't go down that road enough and it's A MUST that he does ASAP. He can't keep ignoring that part of this platform, especially in SC.
 
I've said this repeatedly and I'll say it again: Ron Paul needs to not only routinely cite the current and former Mossad heads, he needs to explain who the Mossad is. Every time he refers to the Mossad, it's like referring to Austrian economics -- it means absolutely nothing to the people he's trying to reach.

"The Mossad, Israel's intelligience agency, says that..."

What's so hard about that?
 
thank the Collins ! lol. still too early it think.
i hope the debate helps and he brings up NDAA, bailouts and TARP.
if we could get 2nd here, it would be great and if 1st, i would start believing in miracles !
 
So no huntsman in this debate then. After SC no Perry in debates either most likely. Ron is going to get a lot more time now. Looking good.
 
Any guesses on how they will stand on the stage.

[Santorum/Paul] [Paul/Santorum] [Romney] [Newt] [Perry]

That is my guess. Newt could be on either side of Romney, Perry could be on either side of the stage (I'm guessing right side).
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

jct74
Fox News 2016 Republican presidential debate in Cleveland - Official Thread
54 55 56
Replies
1K
Views
51K
RonPaulGeorge&Ringo
R
jct74
January 28th Republican debate on Fox News - Official Thread
45 46 47
Replies
932
Views
42K
spikel
S
carlton
Official CNN GOP Debate Thread 12-15-15
62 63 64
Replies
1K
Views
47K
limequat
limequat
rg17
October 28th Republican debate on CNBC - Official thread
33 34 35
Replies
685
Views
29K
Jan2017
J
A
Unofficial official thread for the debate toady
Replies
5
Views
809
TheTexan
TheTexan
Back
Top