SC Debate - FNC (1/16/12) 9pm ET - Official Thread

It's not perfect. But our right of trial by a jury of our peers is the best that has ever been created.

I'm sure as hell not willing to trade it in for edict by Presidential decree. Are you?

That is what I just said...did you not read my quote????

Wait Ron says trust the judicial system, yet he says it is racist in some elements with prejudice.

It doesn't mean they are incompatible. It just means we need to correct what is wrong with it.

That means to correct it...fix it. Doesn't mean get rid of it. Where did I say abandon it???
 
Sure as @#$@# better than getting thrown in prison forever at the whim of the executive.

That is what I just said...did you not read my quote????

Wait Ron says trust the judicial system, yet he says it is racist in some elements with prejudice.

It doesn't mean they are incompatible. It just means we need to correct what is wrong with it.

That means to correct it...fix it. Doesn't mean get rid of it. Where did I say abandon it???
 
As frustrating as it is, you have to realize you can't win a debate where the questions are scripted like this. Example:

Had Ron's question been phrased: "With the country now over $15 trillion in debt, and difficulty in paying for Federal programs that are needed by some of our most vulnerable citizens, can you explain how your plans to draw down American intervention in foreign countries would help sustain these programs without killing the budget?

Get nasty questions, you always look bad. Socratic reasoning = rigged.
 
It is better than saying people are guilty without a trial and leaving them in prison for life. You wouldn't agree?? Seriously?

That is what I just said...did you not read my quote????

Wait Ron says trust the judicial system, yet he says it is racist in some elements with prejudice.

It doesn't mean they are incompatible. It just means we need to correct what is wrong with it.

That means to correct it...fix it. Doesn't mean get rid of it. Where did I say abandon it???
 
As frustrating as it is, you have to realize you can't win a debate where the questions are scripted like this. Example:

Had Ron's question been phrased: "With the country now over $15 trillion in debt, and difficulty in paying for Federal programs that are needed by some of our most vulnerable citizens, can you explain how your plans to draw down American intervention in foreign countries would help sustain these programs without killing the budget?

Get nasty questions, you always look bad. Socratic reasoning = rigged.
 
I'm moving to an island somewhere, who's in. I've got to get away from the people in this country.
 
Paul really made it sound like Bin Laden would still be alive today because he would have respected Pakistan's sovereignty. UNREAL.

thanks spin doctor.

that's not what he said.

some of us actually can you know, understand him despite your efforts.
 
Back
Top