Sarah Palin Video, Not Acting, Best Idea For Honest Government EVER!

[GunnyFreedom]

Thank you! I'll owe you another rep for this...I'll give you a covert shout-out in my acceptance speech!

Be sure to use hand signals and code words only! We're supposed to be covert cool agents, after all ...

She can borrow my dog-whistle.

 

[Occam's Banana]

She can borrow my dog-whistle.

Hmmm. I dunno ... I think Christopher A. Brown might be keyed into the dog-whistle frequencies ...

On the other hand, his filters seem to be rather wide, so maybe it'll be okay ...

 

[Henry Rogue]

<---- LOOK!! It's official! I'm a Covert Cog-Infil Agent!



No there isn't. "Lie detectors" do not "verify" anything - with the possible exception of the interviewer's biases ...

... or the gullibility of fools who think that they do.

And you weren't even able to suss out that it wasn't really Sarah Palin in those videos - so what the hell would you know about "simple verification" anyway?

Moving on ... I'm gonna repost your entire reply, just because it's so damn funny ...



Curses!! Foiled again!! rolleyes

♩♩ ... Oh, be careful what you say, or you'll give yourself away ... ♬

Great now I'm going to go to bed with that song stuck in my head... Giving you a number and taking away your name...
I'll have to play Tracks of My Tears, to counteract. Maybe Smokey instead of Johnny.

 

[Occam's Banana]

Great now I'm going to go to bed with that song stuck in my head ...

Hey, man, I'm a cog-infil agent.
Cognitive infiltration is what I do ...

 

[TheTexan]

How would lie detectors help? Government truly does love you and just wants to help you... they aren't lying about it.

 

[cajuncocoa]

Be sure to use hand signals and code words only! We're supposed to be covert cool agents, after all ...

Oh, of course!! *wink, wink*

 

[cajuncocoa]

Great now I'm going to go to bed with that song stuck in my head... Giving you a number and taking away your name...
I'll have to play Tracks of My Tears, to counteract. Maybe Smokey instead of Johnny.

Here ya go.




Be careful....I've embedded a secret message in da YouTubes.

 

[Christopher A. Brown]

There is someone in this thread dumb enough to be tricked into serving the covert forces while thinking himself fighting them all the while

Can you explain why the covert forces want new politicians to take polygraph exams documenting their intents regarding their political platform?

Which covert forces would use an understanding of the purpose of free speech as a point of unity and legal basis to alter or abolish through Article V?

ANSWER?

 

[Christopher A. Brown]

<---- LOOK!! It's official! I'm a Covert Cog-Infil Agent!

Finally the truth.

No there isn't. "Lie detectors" do not "verify" anything - with the possible exception of the interviewer's biases ...

... or the gullibility of fools who think that they do.

And you weren't even able to suss out that it wasn't really Sarah Palin in those videos - so what the hell would you know about "simple verification" anyway?

I admit I've not watched enough TV to really know why she looks like or sounds like.

I posted the link because it's a good idea for honest politicians to get votes

Just think of how embarrassing their competition would be when asked if they will take a polygraph? Haa hah haa, that alone is worth bringing the lie detector into a campaign. I can imagine them sputtering using your lame excuses and distortions to make it seem meaningless,

It's not meaningless, but it's not perfect either.

But seriously I've talked to several examiners and they truthfully said the things are not fool proof. But they also said that even the best liars actually show it in the graph when they lie. It's all about knowing what the graph looks like when they are telling the truth.

One things certain, there is far too much lying going on in politics and ANYTHING that will limit is a good thing.

 

[Occam's Banana]

But seriously I've talked to several examiners and they truthfully said the things are not fool proof. But they also said that even the best liars actually show it in the graph when they lie. It's all about knowing what the graph looks like when they are telling the truth.

LOLOLOL

I'll bet ancient Greek priests said exactly the same kind of thing.

"Sheep entrails are not foolproof oracles - it's all about knowing what the liver looks like ..."

 

[acptulsa]

Can you explain why the covert forces want new politicians to take polygraph exams documenting their intents regarding their political platform?

The closest thing to evidence I've seen that they do is the fact that you're here trying to waste our time with it.

But if they started to advocate for such a thing, I would say they want the foolish to have faith in them. And I suppose there are worse ways to cause fools to have faith in you than to play a polygraph machine like a fiddle. Should work very well on some.

 

[KingNothing]

Also, sociopaths/psychopaths are extremely overrepresented in elective office. Assuming for the sake of argument that a psychopath is 2% of the population, it is likely 35-40% of elected persons.

This would in fact increase the psychos in government, because 1) voters really do not like truth-tellers, and 2) only psychopaths could get past the polygraph.

Implement this plan and you will go from a 30% sociopathic government to a 90% sociopathic government.

Interestingly, the video about restoring "honesty" is trying to pass off a lie about interviewing Sarah Palin. Integrity starts at home.

I've read a slew of articles that discussed how false that statement is, and how bad that is for the rest of it --- effectively, it means that our terrible leaders are not broken people. They're just like the rest of us. All the more reason, I think, to limit the power of government. Imagine what would happen if the stars somehow aligned and 40 percent of our government were comprised of sociopaths!

 

[GunnyFreedom]

I've read a slew of articles that discussed how false that statement is, and how bad that is for the rest of it --- effectively, it means that our terrible leaders are not broken people. They're just like the rest of us. All the more reason, I think, to limit the power of government. Imagine what would happen if the stars somehow aligned and 40 percent of our government were comprised of sociopaths!

I don't honestly care what a bunch of articles say. I witnessed it first hand. A clear plurality of the elected persons I encountered completely lacked empathy of any kind.

 

[Christopher A. Brown]

I've read a slew of articles that discussed how false that statement is, and how bad that is for the rest of it --- effectively, it means that our terrible leaders are not broken people. They're just like the rest of us. All the more reason, I think, to limit the power of government. Imagine what would happen if the stars somehow aligned and 40 percent of our government were comprised of sociopaths!

It could be 60%, but gunny likes it the way it is. He refuses to advocate that free speech have the ultimate purpose of enabling unity adequate to alter or abolish, let alone accept a simple mechanism to determine a level of relative truthfulness.

 

[Christopher A. Brown]

Oh, of course!! *wink, wink*

Oh puleeese, the covert, false social group piling on approval is so obvious.

 

[GunnyFreedom]

It could be 60%, but gunny likes it the way it is. He refuses to advocate that free speech have the ultimate purpose of enabling unity adequate to alter or abolish, let alone accept a simple mechanism to determine a level of relative truthfulness.

My utter and complete disapproval of you, does not entail any kind of approval of the status quo. Your argument presumes that any deviation from the status quo must necessarily imply the approval of Christopher A. Brown. That's insane. You should not assume that merely because people recognize you as narcissistic psychopathic psychotic, and insane that that means they are supportive of the fascistic, tyrannical, and despotic status quo. We oppose your insanity BECAUSE we believe in a free society with the right to free speech in a minarchistic or anarchistic governance.

You place way, way too much value on yourself. A rejection of you, personally, does not imply the embrace of the societal status quo. Your thinking that it does, betrays an enormous psychological problem within your personality.

 

[Cissy]

My utter and complete disapproval of you, does not entail any kind of approval of the status quo. Your argument presumes that any deviation from the status quo must necessarily imply the approval of Christopher A. Brown. That's insane. You should not assume that merely because people recognize you as narcissistic psychopathic psychotic, and insane that that means they are supportive of the fascistic, tyrannical, and despotic status quo. We oppose your insanity BECAUSE we believe in a free society with the right to free speech in a minarchistic or anarchistic governance.

You place way, way too much value on yourself. A rejection of you, personally, does not imply the embrace of the societal status quo. Your thinking that it does, betrays an enormous psychological problem within your personality.

"You must spread some Reputation around before giving it to GunnyFreedom again."

One ought to be able to give rep to the same person at least twice before receiving this notification.....

 

[Christopher A. Brown]

My utter and complete disapproval of you, does not entail any kind of approval of the status quo. Your argument presumes that any deviation from the status quo must necessarily imply the approval of Christopher A. Brown.

Your utter and complete failure to recognize that approval of the prime constitutional intent of the PURPOSE of free speech in its material law role of enabling the unity needed to effectively alter or abolish government destructive to unalienable rights is essentially our only route to freedom in the long term; means you really are not interested in rights and freedoms for America. Your failure renders your opinion worthless and servient to the elite powers that be.

Your effort to attribute unalienable rights to me or approval of them unique to me rejects natural law and our historical agreements which have created the best aspects of the society we have. Your action then works to degrade our potential to rebuild the best we can know.

The status quo only exists because of Americans usage of the purpose of free speech to create unity needed to defend and secure rights.

You oppose that unity and defense of rights by ignoring the need for a method of unity based in the intents if the framing documents which defends them.

Your post also has intentional cognitive flaws indicating your role within cognitive infiltration.

 

[Christopher A. Brown]

"You must spread some Reputation around before giving it to GunnyFreedom again."

One ought to be able to give rep to the same person at least twice before receiving this notification.....

So you approve of his rejection of the ultimate PURPOSE of free speech as being to enable our unity needed to alter or abolish government destructive to unalienable rights?

 

[DevilsAdvocate]

We can't detect lies, only certain physical changes, such as the amount of sweat on your arm, blood pressure, heart rate, pupil dilation. For a skilled subject, such a test is very easy to defeat.

(You can produce these results by clenching your butt. No joke, this is an actual technique used to defeat lie detectors)

Maybe you could detect a lie by doing an MRI scan on brain patterns?