Again, Paul's victory is far from a sure thing and encouraging people to act like it is will hurt his campaign.
So you are telling me, unless Rand fundraises even more, that he won't win? How about we let SarahPAC fund him from here on out, and we use the off-setting funds to fund liberty candidates? I know, novelty idea..![]()
Now Rand has the neocons paying him to win. Interesting development.
Thank goodness today is the KOKESH MONEYBOMB and tomorrow is the MEDINA MONEYBOMB!! No neocon PACs sponsoring those campaigns.
Rand will need more cash, no doubt. If he doesn't get it will he be elected? Who knows? But assuming he's got the election tied up...well...you know what assuming does...
Encouraging people to abandon Rand and focus their attention on other candidates will only have a negative impact on his campaign.
A Palin endorsement would be a huge boost for Medina before the election.
Ok, can we shift our fundraising to people like Adam, RJ, Debra, Jake and Peter now?
I don't know if you missed the part, but I specifically said Primary. We can get back to Rand in the General, but for now we have to get all of our liberty-candidates past the primary and Rand is about 98% confirmed to get the Primary at this point.
It would such a shame if RJ, Adam, Jake, or Pat didn't get past the primaries or were too ill-funded to do much in the General, because of irrational fears about Rand losing now.
You can if you want. Me, I like where Rand Paul's campaign is going: namely UP.
Mommy to melt down in 3...2....1....
I believe a PAC can only give $4k to a campaign (I could be wrong though).How about we let SarahPAC fund him from here on out, and we use the off-setting funds to fund liberty candidates? I know, novelty idea..![]()
I believe a PAC can only give $4k to a campaign (I could be wrong though).
I believe a PAC can only give $4k to a campaign (I could be wrong though).