Sarah Palin endorses (confirmed)

C

ch164708

Member
Joined
Oct 6, 2009
Messages
42
EXCLUSIVE: Palin Endorses Rand Paul CONFIRMED

David Adams, Rand Paul's campaign manager has confirmed this morning that SarahPAC has sent them financial support and authorized the release of that information as an endorsement of Rand Paul for the GOP candidate to replace retiring baseball hall of fame pitcher and two term incumbent Jim Bunning.



"This is a huge boost to the Paul campaign and will open the way for more endorsements to follow", said one local GOP insider.

from bluegrass bulletin
 
No way!

they are going to literally freak out now.

You will see a full on blitz for Treyson. Either that, or you will see treyson be forced out, and the leadership back Rand.

Wither way, the General election will be expensive.
 
I wouldn't want her supporting MY campaign, if I had one.


But, I don't, and I know that KY politics are different than my local politics.


It does send a signal that Rand is doing a stellar job of polling well.

The Tea Party convention is coming up pretty soon in KY isn't it?
 
I'm no fan of Sarah, but I'll take the money where we can get it! Not to mention this is a MAJOR BLOW TO GRAYSON (which makes me giddy). The wind is blowing in the direction of the Tea Partiers and let Rand get carried away in it!
 
Pat, the Tea Party convention is next door in Tennessee, but yeah, that's coming up.
 
Thanks, I'm still waking up and trying to orient myself--
 
Last edited:
SarahPAC not Sarah Palin. So what that means for KY im not sure. While the PAC is supported by Palin its still not an endorsement from herself (yet) It would be like saying Ron Paul made an endorsement when the C4L did.

http://www.bluegrassbulletin.com/2010/02/exclusive-palin-endorses-rand-paul-confirmed.html


David Adams, Rand Paul's campaign manager has confirmed this morning that SarahPAC has sent them financial support and authorized the release of that information as an endorsement of Rand Paul for the GOP candidate to replace retiring baseball hall of fame pitcher and two term incumbent Jim Bunning.
Click to expand...
 
koob said:
I'm no fan of Sarah, but I'll take the money where we can get it! Not to mention this is a MAJOR BLOW TO GRAYSON (which makes me giddy). The wind is blowing in the direction of the Tea Partiers and let Rand get carried away in it!
Click to expand...

+1000

If Grayson is Glass Joe from Mike Tyson's Super Punchout, he just took an uppercut with this.


50860569_b8583dae2d_o.jpg
 
erowe1 said:
You're waiting for someone here to give you permission to fund the candidates you want to fund?
Click to expand...

No. I would imagine the people who donated to Rand would be the types of people to donate to people like Jake, RJ, Adam, and Debra. I would also imagine that most of us are younger and as such don't have the same disposable income as people who are older. Therefore we prioritize who we give to. Since it is obvious Rand is going to win the Primary with no problems from here on out it would be better if we could now shift (in general numbers) our efforts to the aforementioned. For those who bemoan strategy, wouldn't this be a more realistic choice to get as many liberty candidates elected as possible?
 
Austrian Econ Disciple said:
No. I would imagine the people who donated to Rand would be the types of people to donate to people like Jake, RJ, Adam, and Debra. I would also imagine that most of us are younger and as such don't have the same disposable income as people who are older. Therefore we prioritize who we give to. Since it is obvious Rand is going to win the Primary with no problems from here on out it would be better if we could now shift (in general numbers) our efforts to the aforementioned. For those who bemoan strategy, wouldn't this be a more realistic choice to get as many liberty candidates elected as possible?
Click to expand...

Rand's election is far from a sure thing.
 
Austrian Econ Disciple said:
No. I would imagine the people who donated to Rand would be the types of people to donate to people like Jake, RJ, Adam, and Debra. I would also imagine that most of us are younger and as such don't have the same disposable income as people who are older. Therefore we prioritize who we give to. Since it is obvious Rand is going to win the Primary with no problems from here on out it would be better if we could now shift (in general numbers) our efforts to the aforementioned. For those who bemoan strategy, wouldn't this be a more realistic choice to get as many liberty candidates elected as possible?
Click to expand...

But nobody here can decide how other people donate to campaigns "in general numbers". Each person just decides for him or herself.
 
erowe1 said:
But nobody here can decide how other people donate to campaigns "in general numbers". Each person just decides for him or herself.
Click to expand...

Way to point to the obvious, but missing the generality. I would hope people would see the huge discrepancy both in momentum, funds, motivation, endorsements, and other auxillary reasons that Rand is about a 95% favorite at this time with the Primary not being too far away. All points, point to easy victory. Now, on the other hand we have embattled candidates who need our funds, more than Rand. I would hope that this would be obvious. If you only want Rand elected, then only donate to Rand. If you want multiple liberty candidates get elected, then look at the races and see how far ahead Rand is and I would hope people would be using their limited funds to help out RJ, Jake, Debra, Adam, Pat Sellers, et. al.

I have donated to all of the above except Pat and I'm trying to pool more funds together. Our dollar can go much further helping these candidates out.
 
Austrian Econ Disciple said:
Way to point to the obvious, but missing the generality. I would hope people would see the huge discrepancy both in momentum, funds, motivation, endorsements, and other auxillary reasons that Rand is about a 95% favorite at this time with the Primary not being too far away. All points, point to easy victory. Now, on the other hand we have embattled candidates who need our funds, more than Rand. I would hope that this would be obvious. If you only want Rand elected, then only donate to Rand. If you want multiple liberty candidates get elected, then look at the races and see how far ahead Rand is and I would hope people would be using their limited funds to help out RJ, Jake, Debra, Adam, Pat Sellers, et. al.

I have donated to all of the above except Pat and I'm trying to pool more funds together. Our dollar can go much further helping these candidates out.
Click to expand...

Again, Paul's victory is far from a sure thing and encouraging people to act like it is will hurt his campaign.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

jct74
Play Paul! Rand to Play in Congressional Baseball Game
Replies
16
Views
3K
dntrpltt
dntrpltt
N
Ron Paul Endorses Kelli Ward To Replace Senator John McCain
Replies
3
Views
4K
Cleaner44
Cleaner44
compromise
Rand Paul 'endorses' Sarah Palin for Senate
2
Replies
20
Views
2K
jmdrake
jmdrake
EBounding
Wall Street Journal: Rand Paul’s Challenge: Charting His Own Course
Replies
5
Views
876
EBounding
EBounding
jct74
Sarah Palin endorses primary challenger to Walter Jones
2
Replies
26
Views
2K
HOLLYWOOD
HOLLYWOOD
Back
Top