Sarah Palin a (small “l”) libertarian

Highland, yes I believe Palin is a practicing Christian. There isn't much she can do about NATO and treaties. NATO should be abolished..it's a BAD DEAL. Palin is on the BOTTOM of the ticket...she will have to parrot McCain to get in. What she supposed to do? Go against him and the neo communists? I see a glimmer of hope in this woman...if she gets in and can't do anything, well...that's a chance I have to take but I know this. Nader, Barr, McKinney or Baldwin dang sure won't get anything accomplished because they can't get in. I choose to continue to work for Liberty..and changing hearts and minds at the local and state levels until we have enough people onboard to make a real difference. TONES
 
Yes..I believe that a large percentage of people on this forum dont' look at other opinions and options. I love Ron Paul and I agree with MOST of what he says. I have been looking at this "free market" idea lately...and I'm not so sure it's the best way. I am coming to believe PROTECTIOISM, Hamiltonian economic philosophy is the BETTER way to go. That's not Ron Paul, sorry...but free market, which has ended up being GLOBALISM...has ruined this country.

No, big-governments, socialism and bad monetary policy has led to Globalism.. not free market economics. I hate it when people blame shit on free-market economics when we haven't had anything close to free market economics in over a century!!

Listen to Ron Paul when he talks about monetary policy, that is his best subject. If we didn't have International Bankers running our monetary policy, and instead produced our own free currency with no central bank then the globalists wouldn't have a leg to stand on. They have levied on a tax on the American people for over a century, they have been stealing from us. That is how they rose to power. It is very very very very simple.

It may be difficult to implement my plan due to the amount of power they have, but your plan is just as difficult of the globalists don't want it.. and your plan is temporary until the globalists take over the policy makers again, whereas my plan is permanent as long as the monetary system, republic and the constitution stays in place. Those should be the keystones of our republic.
 
Last edited:
Yes I fear capitalism IS socialism. It is now anyway. We might have to go back to protectionism in order to get stabalized. How do acheive that...I dunno. tones
 
No, big-governments, socialism and bad monetary policy has led to Globalism.. not free market economics. I hate it when people blame shit on free-market economics when we haven't had anything close to free market economics in over a century!!

Listen to Ron Paul when he talks about monetary policy, that is his best subject. If we didn't have International Bankers running our monetary policy, and instead produced our own free currency with no central bank then the globalists wouldn't have a leg to stand on.

That may be difficult, but your plan is just as difficult of the globalists don't want it.

Study Mussolini.

It's called corporate fascism.

History repeating itself.
 
The Flaw of Capitalism

What is Capitalism?

The American-Counter-Revolution has derived its "definition" of Capitalism from the book Capitalism For Beginners, Robert Lekachman and Borin Van Loon, 1980, pages three and four.

The reason for this is very simple and basic. In 1980 Robert Lekachman was the Distinguished Professor of Economics at the City University of New York. City University of New York (used to be City College of New York) has played a central role in the Permanent Revolution (and the generation of many Conspiracy Theories). Lekachman's definition/basic description of Capitalism is very simple and at the same time very precise and remarkably correct.

"The bare, basic essentials of Capitalism are these":

Capital is the portion of a nation's wealth that is man-made and therefore reproducible. (Emphasis in the original)

Under Capitalism, a society's capital equipment, its means of production, is owned by a minority of individuals who have the legal right to use this property for private gain.

Capitalism relies on the market system, which determines distribution, allocates resources and establishes the income levels, wages, rents and profits of the different social classes.
There is more to Capitalism than that. It can refer to an economic system, the society built on it and a historical stage of Western, First world, civilization.

The trouble is, can we trust any economist to tell us the truth about Capitalism? Capitalism has continually suffered and overcome, crisis... Inflation contributes to the instability of financial markets, trade imbalances and the financial crisis of the state.

The Flaw of Capitalism is most obvious in the above quote. Take a few minutes and compare Lekachman's Rule #1 with the last quoted sentence.

Capital (money) is man-made and reproducible. Inflation contributes to instability in markets and creates financial crisis for the State.

In the American Republic its Capital (money) is created (printed by the US Treasury) and then controlled (distributed) by the Federal Reserve. Do you see the problem?

Inflation contributes to instability. "Capitalism has continually suffered and overcome crisis."

Capitalism can not exist without inflationism... Capital that is reproducible/man-made... money.

What is Inflationism?
This is a most simple, legitimate and logical question to ask.

According to Webster's Seventh New Collegiate Dictionary, 1963 (The American-Counter-Revolution uses this dictionary for the vast majority of word definition) "Inflationism" is simply defined as follows,

"The policy of economic inflation."

Simply stated, the printing of money. Remember money/capital is man-made/reproducible.

Capitalism can not survive without Capital... money. The Capital... money must come from somewhere. Maybe we need to look at the variety of words based on the base word "inflate".

"To puff up, to expand or increase abnormally."

So Capital/money by definition is "inflatable."

"Capable of being inflated."

So our Capital/money supply is "inflated."

"Expanded to an abnormal or unjustifiable volume or level."

If Capital/money is inflated this must lead to "inflation."

"An act of inflating, an increase in the volume of money and credit relative to available goods resulting in a substantial and continuing rise in the general price level."

Yes... Capital/money... reproducible, man-made wealth... is "inflationary."

"Characterized by, or productive of inflation."

And if you have been paying close attention, it is obvious this leads to "inflationary spiral."

"A continuous rise in prices that is sustained by the tendency of wage increase and cost increases to react on each other."

And of course this brings us all back to inflationism... of which Capitalism can not survive without its existence. Do you see the problem yet? Economists can not tell us the truth about Capitalism. What is that truth?

Simply stated., by its very nature Capitalism creates its own demise in its pursuit of survival... overproduction and under-consumption... The Flaw of Capitalism.
 
The Flaw of Capitalism

What is Capitalism?

The American-Counter-Revolution has derived its "definition" of Capitalism from the book Capitalism For Beginners, Robert Lekachman and Borin Van Loon, 1980, pages three and four.

The reason for this is very simple and basic. In 1980 Robert Lekachman was the Distinguished Professor of Economics at the City University of New York. City University of New York (used to be City College of New York) has played a central role in the Permanent Revolution (and the generation of many Conspiracy Theories). Lekachman's definition/basic description of Capitalism is very simple and at the same time very precise and remarkably correct.

"The bare, basic essentials of Capitalism are these":

Capital is the portion of a nation's wealth that is man-made and therefore reproducible. (Emphasis in the original)

Under Capitalism, a society's capital equipment, its means of production, is owned by a minority of individuals who have the legal right to use this property for private gain.

Capitalism relies on the market system, which determines distribution, allocates resources and establishes the income levels, wages, rents and profits of the different social classes.
There is more to Capitalism than that. It can refer to an economic system, the society built on it and a historical stage of Western, First world, civilization.

The trouble is, can we trust any economist to tell us the truth about Capitalism? Capitalism has continually suffered and overcome, crisis... Inflation contributes to the instability of financial markets, trade imbalances and the financial crisis of the state.

The Flaw of Capitalism is most obvious in the above quote. Take a few minutes and compare Lekachman's Rule #1 with the last quoted sentence.

Capital (money) is man-made and reproducible. Inflation contributes to instability in markets and creates financial crisis for the State.

In the American Republic its Capital (money) is created (printed by the US Treasury) and then controlled (distributed) by the Federal Reserve. Do you see the problem?

Inflation contributes to instability. "Capitalism has continually suffered and overcome crisis."

Capitalism can not exist without inflationism... Capital that is reproducible/man-made... money.

What is Inflationism?
This is a most simple, legitimate and logical question to ask.

According to Webster's Seventh New Collegiate Dictionary, 1963 (The American-Counter-Revolution uses this dictionary for the vast majority of word definition) "Inflationism" is simply defined as follows,

"The policy of economic inflation."

Simply stated, the printing of money. Remember money/capital is man-made/reproducible.

Capitalism can not survive without Capital... money. The Capital... money must come from somewhere. Maybe we need to look at the variety of words based on the base word "inflate".

"To puff up, to expand or increase abnormally."

So Capital/money by definition is "inflatable."

"Capable of being inflated."

So our Capital/money supply is "inflated."

"Expanded to an abnormal or unjustifiable volume or level."

If Capital/money is inflated this must lead to "inflation."

"An act of inflating, an increase in the volume of money and credit relative to available goods resulting in a substantial and continuing rise in the general price level."

Yes... Capital/money... reproducible, man-made wealth... is "inflationary."

"Characterized by, or productive of inflation."

And if you have been paying close attention, it is obvious this leads to "inflationary spiral."

"A continuous rise in prices that is sustained by the tendency of wage increase and cost increases to react on each other."

And of course this brings us all back to inflationism... of which Capitalism can not survive without its existence. Do you see the problem yet? Economists can not tell us the truth about Capitalism. What is that truth?

Simply stated., by its very nature Capitalism creates its own demise in its pursuit of survival... overproduction and under-consumption... The Flaw of Capitalism.

And the error of anyalysts is to believe that the supply of money must go up for the suppy of goods and services to go up. That is a lie.
 
The Flaw

The Flaw of Capitalism has been observed by several well acclaimed intellectuals and economists over the last 200 years. This list includes Adam Smith (18th Century), Karl Marx (19th Century), and Joseph Schumpeter (20th Century). Yes all three men... separated by space and time.. made the same basic observation about Capitalism. What is this unified observation?

Adam Smith's analysis was not based on any kind of data collection (Smith was a philosopher). Karl Marx was also a philosopher and like Smith his conclusions were not based on any kind of collected data. In contrast Schumpeter was a data-driven researcher. Schumpeter was an economist not a philosopher. Smith and Marx made the same exact non-data-driven observations about the Classical Theory of Economic Development (from The Second Industrial Divide, Piore and Sabel, 1980, page 22)

"The specialization of manual work whatever its immediate impact on productivity was decisively important because it led to the introduction of special-purpose automatic machinery. Once a human task had been decomposed into its elementary motions, it became possible to build a device that would perform these motions automatically, and as one step of a manufacturing process was thus mechanized, the preceding and following steps had to be correspondingly reorganized to keep pace with the new machinery."

Schumpeter's data-supported observations on The Classical Theory of Economic Development, from his Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy (pages 82-83), goes like this,

"The essential point to grasp is that in dealing with Capitalism we are dealing with an evolutionary process. It may seem strange that anyone can fail to see so obvious fact which moreover was long ago emphasized by Karl Marx... Capitalism, then, is by nature a form or method of economic change... this fact is important and these changes (wars, revolution and so on) often condition industrial change... The fundamental impulse that sets and keeps the Capitalist engine in motion comes from the new consumers' goods, the new methods of production or transportation, the new markets, the new forms or industrial organization that Capitalist enterprise creates."

Now comes the major problem that Smith, Marx and Schumpeter all recognized. (from The Second Industrial Divide, page 23)

"Obviously, it made no sense to rearrange the production setup to increase output if there was no market for the increase and the rearrangement made it expensive to switch the resources to some alternative purpose."

Do you see the problem? The Marketplace only works if there is enough money in the hands of the people (the Marketplace) that do not own the Means of Production to purchase what is made by American/British Capitalism.

Creative Destruction (Capitalist Expansion) will not work if there does not exist a currency in sufficient quantity for the masses in the marketplace to support its expansion. The End of National currency

International Communism is impossible without the prior-existence of an International Socialism.

International Socialism is impossible without the existence of a International Capitalism as the sole means of production for Planet Earth.
 
And the error of anyalysts is to believe that the supply of money must go up for the suppy of goods and services to go up. That is a lie.

Absolutely. Capitalism thrived in this nation for about a century on the gold standard, after all.

Indeed, we went from being a backwater to being a superpower almost exclusively on pure capitalism and the gold standard, and it looks like the government and the Federal Reserve has just about finished reversing the process.
 
The idea of capitalism, free trade is based on the notion that everyone has the opportunity to become the "merchant class" so to speak. I don't see that happening in 2008. Communists figured out in order to have COMMUNISM you MUST have capital. They just want the STATE to control it..NOT the free markets...and the communists have taken over our government. Tones (if this makes any sense)
 
Now comes the major problem that Smith, Marx and Schumpeter all recognized. (from The Second Industrial Divide, page 23)

"Obviously, it made no sense to rearrange the production setup to increase output if there was no market for the increase and the rearrangement made it expensive to switch the resources to some alternative purpose."

Do you see the problem? The Marketplace only works if there is enough money in the hands of the people (the Marketplace) that do not own the Means of Production to purchase what is made by American/British Capitalism.

Creative Destruction (Capitalist Expansion) will not work if there does not exist a currency in sufficient quantity for the masses in the marketplace to support its expansion. The End of National currency

International Communism is impossible without the prior-existence of an International Socialism.

International Socialism is impossible without the existence of a International Capitalism as the sole means of production for Planet Earth.

I don't get it. Are they really saying that the fatal flaw in capitalism is that it works so well that it retards socialism?

That's the only point I can squeeze out of this circular double-talk.
 
Yes, and remember...it was a more MORAL society 100 years ago. In order to have true free trade you have to have a MORAL society...that is GONE bye bye. Greed took over the marketplace. Remember , the communists immigrated en masse to the USA during and after WW1. Communism has taken over the government. Tones
 
Well, the point that is being made has to do with FABIANISM. thats' the root of it, the British Fabian society. it's rather complicated...I posted the site..and i guess you would have to understand Fabianism. The site maintains that Great Britian and their socialist Fabian society is still in control. It is really quite an interesting concept. Tones
 
Highland, yes I believe Palin is a practicing Christian. There isn't much she can do about NATO and treaties. NATO should be abolished..it's a BAD DEAL. Palin is on the BOTTOM of the ticket...she will have to parrot McCain to get in. What she supposed to do? Go against him and the neo communists? I see a glimmer of hope in this woman...if she gets in and can't do anything, well...that's a chance I have to take but I know this. Nader, Barr, McKinney or Baldwin dang sure won't get anything accomplished because they can't get in. I choose to continue to work for Liberty..and changing hearts and minds at the local and state levels until we have enough people onboard to make a real difference. TONES

I just can't vote on "I hope she isn't a neocon" Same is true with Obama. Some people hope he will get in and not be all CFR.....She is marketing herself as neocon, so I am compelled to believe her. I don't know myself what to do as far as voting, so I am still in prayer. RP won't be counted as a write-in in NC and Baldwin isn't on the ballot! I don't believe in Barr, so who to choose.
 
eh...Nader is a socialist. I'd like to see us return to the way things were before we were invaded by communists. That was over 100 years ago. Tones
 
Back
Top