Rick Santorum Santorum Says Gay Parents Worse Than Convicts

Intoxiklown

Member
Joined
Dec 5, 2011
Messages
1,670
Rick Santorum continued his string of antigay pronouncements while on the trail in New Hampshire, saying a man in jail would be a better parent than a same-sex couple.

The Los Angeles Timesreports from Manchester, New Hampshire that Santorum claimed to quote an anti-poverty expert while explaining his case.

"He found that even fathers in jail who had abandoned their kids were still better than no father at all to have in their children's lives," Santorum told voters about the researcher, according to the Times.

If a same-sex couple were to raise a child, they would be "robbing children of something they need, they deserve, they have a right to. You may rationalize that that isn't true, but in your own life and in your own heart, you know it's true."

This isn't a new theme for Santorum and it potentially sets him apart from other Republican candidates for president. While in Iowa, where he finished behind Mitt Romney by eight votes, Santorum signed a pledge from the Iowa Family Leader that proclaimed his belief that same-sex parents are inferior to straight ones. Romney and Ron Paul did not sign the pledge, and Newt Gingrich inexplicably ignored that portion in his letter to the group backing only parts of it. (Gingrich's lesbian step-sister, Candace Gingrich-Jones, toldThe Advocate in December that she and her wife would like to have children.)

We can think of at least one person who would disagree with Santorum on whether kids raised by LGBT parents are robbed of anything. Watch video below of Zach Wahls, an Iowa college student who spoke eloquently last year before his state's legislature about why his moms should be allowed to marry.

http://www.advocate.com/News/Daily_News/2012/01/07/Santorum_Says_Gay_Parents_Worse_Than_Convicts/
 
What if a father and a male Roomate raised a child because it's mother died in a war he supports. How does that not rob the child of a normal upbringing? Should the government put a temp mother in there to keep the child from getting "the gay"?

Mr. Santorum, please stop talking and drop out. You are a caveman wearing a sweater vest and disgrace to human civilization.
 
I think it's best for a child to have a father or a mother. To serve as role models, if nothing else. But, if a child is needing to be adopted, I don't see why anyone would rather a child sit in some state institution, instead of being adopted by a gay couple who would give the child love.
 
This is just a completely collectivist way of thinking.

Santorum doesn't see people as individuals. It is obvious in all cases that individuals are different and do not act the same in any given circumstance. You would think that Glenn Beck and the anti-collectivist preachers would pick up on this collectivism and would be repulsed. Silly me...
 
Children are not an entitlement. No one has the "right" to adopt. There's big money in the adoption industry, and it frequently operates as a mechanism that takes children from those with limited resources and redistributes them to those who are "in the market" for a child for whatever reason. If this redistribution of children happens through the state, adoption is frequently subsidized.

But Santorum doesn't care about any of this. I would be interested to know if he supports the rights of a father who is in jail and has abandoned his children if that child was re-homed to a white, middle-class, Christian married couple. Something tells me he wouldn't be so supportive of the rights of natural parents under that circumstance.
 
I love how a 20 year old news letter than Ron Paul didn't write is still getting media coverage, yet homophobic stuff that Rick Santorum is saying RIGHT FUCKING NOW is glossed over.
 
I love how a 20 year old news letter than Ron Paul didn't write is still getting media coverage, yet homophobic stuff that Rick Santorum is saying RIGHT FUCKING NOW is glossed over.

I KNOW RIGHT? I mean this right here, RIGHT HERE:

"He found that even fathers in jail who had abandoned their kids were still better than no father at all to have in their children's lives," Santorum told voters about the researcher, according to the Times.

How can you get way with that when you know it's not true. It's disgusting how he can such vulgar things about people who just want to love and raise a child. So what about single parent homes, Santorum? Since they only have one parental figure, is that okayor are they being robbed too? It's not unheard for children to have role models that are not their parents.

Geez, I just want to have him time travel to the era of the Salem Witch Trials and stay there. I'm sure he would love it.
 
Geez, people. Why was the father jailed? It's not like everyone in jail is Charles Manson. (Charles Manson does have a son who is an adoptee, searched and found his identity, and does correspond with Manson, btw.) Anyone here remember that part of the reason Dr Paul opposes the drug war is because it breaks up families? Or does that not apply when the sacred cow, ADOPTION, is mentioned? And why did the father abandon the child? Is it simply because he's in jail? That is frequently what it comes down to in the court papers.

Santorum is undoubtedly a hypocrite and definitely a big supporter of adoption, but this is all just spin. Why vilify any father for some very loosely defined hypothetical situation? Just because a guy is in jail doesn't mean he should be stripped of his parental rights and never see his children again. That's just crazy.
 
Everything I've read, and every psychologist I personally know, says that there is no discernible difference in terms of outcome for children with two parents of different sexes and those with two parents of the same sex. I don't know why people keep pushing this tripe.
 
I love how a 20 year old news letter than Ron Paul didn't write is still getting media coverage, yet homophobic stuff that Rick Santorum is saying RIGHT FUCKING NOW is glossed over.

Its the only thing they have that they think is a "gotcha". They have absolutely nothing else to personally attack him on. They even make up crap that is not true they are so desperate.

The other candidates have volumes of dirt they have said or personally involved with. The media actually has to be careful what they say about them as to not totally destroy their chances before the election.
 
Here ya go, guys. If you're not married when your child is born, this is what you have to do to avoid "abandoning" your child. And by the way, the registries mentioned are state registries. If your child is not born in the state you register, too bad. Best to register in all 50 states.

http://library.adoption.com/article...-from-being-adopted-without-your-consent.html

If you think parenthood isn't regulated to aid the adoption industry, think again.
 
I think it's best for a child to have a father or a mother. To serve as role models, if nothing else. But, if a child is needing to be adopted, I don't see why anyone would rather a child sit in some state institution, instead of being adopted by a gay couple who would give the child love.

Wise words. I would personally prefer that kids have two parents of the opposite sex, but while I think homosexuality is wrong, I am not going to force anyone to change their ways. That would be ineffective and morally wrong.
 
Back
Top