I was going to make the same point. This is the MSM and the government telling us who is invading what. THey've lied and been wrong before. Gulf of Tonkin?? Do we have any real evidence that actual Iranian citizens have taken over an Iraqi oil well?
The false flag attack paradigm is not limited to Americans. To think that only Americans have the ability to set up a false flag attack is egocentric and inaccurate.
Also, even if some people who live in Iran have taken over an oil well owned by some Iraqi people, does the US have any business messing around with the dispute?
First point, no we have no evidence. We have reports. But, they are being reported by some pretty good sources (I know you will all name 5,000 things the NYT, ect. have gotten wrong...).
Second point, you're right, I was speaking from a strictly American point of view, forgive me for not having a cosmopolitan enough outlook. My point was more that in order to rally Americans around a cause, it works out better to have Americans directly involved.
I am not sure if the third point is directed at me, because it is making a point I did not address.
Again, at this point I see no reason not to take this story at face value. I think we can agree we do not want to see the U.S. go to war with Iran. What th circumstances are surrounding that point are not as important as that main issue.
The other thing, to reiterate, anytime oil is involved I tend to believe states are genuinely willing to send armies to fight for it.
Also, someone mentioned the possibility of this creating a rallying point for Iraqi nationalism. That would probably be the case if there wasn't so much sectarian in-fighting. Sunni's and Shi'ite do not seem to be willing to compromise for the betterment of Iraq.